Skip to main content
Log in

A method for a robust optimization of joint product and supply chain design

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a method for finding a robust solution to the problem of joint product family and supply chain design. Optimizing product design and the supply chain network at the same time brings substantial benefits. However, this approach involves decisions that can generate uncertainties in the long term. The challenge is to come up with a method that can adapt to most possible environments without straying too far from the optimal solution. Our approach is based on the generation of scenarios that correspond to combinations of uncertain parameters within the model. The performance of designs resulting from these scenario optimizations are compared to the performance of each of the other design scenarios, based on their probability of occurrence. The proposed methodology will allow practitioners to choose a suitable design, from the most profitable to the most reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baud-Lavigne, B., Agard, B., & Penz, B. (2011). A MILP model for joint product family and supply chain design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM’2011), Metz, France (pp. 889–897). International Institute for Innovation, Industrial Engineering and Entrepreneurship (I4e2). ISBN 978-2-9600532-3-4.

  • Baud-Lavigne, B., Agard, B., & Penz, B. (2012). Mutual impacts of product standardization and supply chain design. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S., Chung, S. H., & Choy, K. L. (2006). Optimization of order fulfillment in distribution network problems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(3), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H.-Y. (2010). The impact of item substitutions on production–distribution networks for supply chains. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(6), 803–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childerhouse, P., & Towill, D. R. (2004). Reducing uncertainty in European supply chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(7), 585–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dani, S. (2009). Predicting and managing supply chain risks. In Supply Chain, Risk (pp. 53–66). Berlin: Springer.

  • El Hadj Khalaf, R., Agard, B., & Penz, B. (2010). An experimental study for the selection of modules and facilities in a mass customization context. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21(6), 703–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ElMaraghy, H., & Mahmoudi, N. (2009). Concurrent design of product modules structure and global supply chain configurations. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22(6), 483–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, J., Simpson, T., & Siddique, Z. (2007). Product family design and platform-based product development: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(1), 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klibi, W., Martel, A., & Guitouni, A. (2010). The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristianto, Y., Helo, P., & Jiao, R. (2013). Mass customization design of engineer-to-order products using benders’ decomposition and bi-level stochastic programming. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(5), 961–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamothe, J., Hadj-Hamou, K., & Aldanondo, M. (2006). An optimization model for selecting a product family and designing its supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(3), 1030–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meepetchdee, Y., & Shah, N. (2007). Logistical network design with robustness and complexity considerations. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37(3), 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi Bidhandi, H., & Mohd Yusuff, R. (2011). Integrated supply chain planning under uncertainty using an improved stochastic approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(6), 2618–2630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, F., & Nagi, R. (2010). Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Computers and Operations Research, 37(4), 668–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvaresh, F., Husseini, S. M. M., Golpayegany, S. A. H., & Karimi, B. (2012). Hub network design problem in the presence of disruptions. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0717-7.

  • Peidro, D., Mula, J., Poler, R., & Lario, F. (2009). Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: A review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43(3), 400–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, L., & Li, L. (2009). Location-allocation model for logistics networks with implementing commonality and postponement strategies. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 2, 1615–1620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad, K. M., & Hadj-Hamou, K. (2013). Integrated supply chain and product family architecture under highly customized demand. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(5), 1005–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. F. (2001). Modeling the Supply Chain. Boston: Duxbury Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, Y., Fushimi, H., & Wada, T. (2011). Robust logistics network modeling and design against uncertainties. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, 5(2), 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G. (1986). Introduction to quality engineering: Designing quality into products and processes. Asian Productivity Organization.

  • Wie, M. V., Stone, R. B., Thevenot, H., & Simpson, T. (2007). Examination of platform and differentiating elements in product family design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Huang, G., Humphreys, P., & Botta-Genoulaz, V. (2010). Simultaneous configuration of platform products and manufacturing supply chains: Comparative investigation into impacts of different supply chain coordination schemes. Production Planning and Control, 21(6), 609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Agard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baud-Lavigne, B., Bassetto, S. & Agard, B. A method for a robust optimization of joint product and supply chain design. J Intell Manuf 27, 741–749 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0908-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0908-5

Keywords

Navigation