Skip to main content
Log in

Distributed production planning based on ATC and MOILP considering different coordination patterns

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is aimed at employing analytical target cascading (ATC) to solve the distributed production planning problem. In the ATC hierarchy, by setting a parent element to the core enterprise and a child element to each manufacturer, the core enterprise can negotiate the plans with the manufactures. Individual manufactures are able to make production plans autonomously, and finally achieve the global objective under the coordination of the core enterprise. ATC offers an independent decision making ability to each member, a decentralize coordination strategy to the core enterprise and a parallel computing method to the planning model. In order to obtain the concrete production quantities and balance the costs and the service levels, a multi-objective integer linear programming has also been introduced in the model, where different costs have different weights. By setting different weights to different optimization objectives, the core enterprise can obtain the lowest overall cost or the best service quantity. Meanwhile, from a strategic point of view, two coordination patterns, competitive and cooperative, through modifying the iterative mode of ATC, are addressed here. The competitive pattern make the core enterprise achieve a lower cost, while the cooperative pattern make the core enterprise maintain a better relationship with the manufactures. A series of comparative analyses are conducted to identify the strengths of the ATC method and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed coordination patterns. In particular, one of these experiments, which considers the quantity discount, has been done to further verify the effectiveness of the ATC based coordination mechanism while encountering the newly added decision-making factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, J., Kokkolaras, M., Zawislak, M., & Papalambros, P. Y. (2005). On the use of analytical target cascading and collaborative optimization for complex system design. In Sixth world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Allison, J., Walsh, D., Kokkolaras, M., Papalambros, P. Y., & Cartmell, M. (2006). Analytical target cascading in aircraft design. In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.

  • Alves, M. J., & Clímaco, J. (2000). An interactive reference point approach for multiobjective mixed-integer programming using branch-and-bound. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(3), 478–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, M. J., & Clímaco, J. (2004). A note on a decision support system for multiobjective integer and mixed-integer programming problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 155(1), 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, R., Chandra, P., & Goyal, S. K. (1993). Models for multi-plant coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 67(2), 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S., Chung, S. H., & Choy, K. L. (2006). Optimization of order fulfillment in distribution network problems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(3), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary, R., Malkawi, A., & Papalambros, P. Y. (2005). Analytic target cascading in simulation-based building design. Automation in Construction, 14(4), 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. B., Georgiopoulos, P., Kim, H. M., & Papalambros, P. Y. (2006). Analytical target setting: An enterprise context in optimal product design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 128(1), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaenens-Flipo, C., & Finke, G. (2001). An integrated model for industrial production–distribution problem. IIE Transactions, 33(9), 705–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnoni, M. G., Iavagnilio, R., Mossa, G., Mummolo, G., & Di Leva, A. (2003). Production planning of a multi-site manufacturing system by hybrid modelling: A case study from the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiremath, N. C., Sahu, S., & Tiwari, M. K. (2012). Multi objective outbound logistics network design for a manufacturing supply chain. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0635-8.

  • Huang, G. Q., & Qu, T. (2008). Extending analytical target cascading for optimal configuration of supply chains with alternative autonomous suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(1), 39–54.

  • Kim, H. M., Michelena, N. F., Papalambros, P. Y., & Jiang, T. (2000). Target cascading in optimal system design. In Proceedings of the 2000 ASME design automation conference, DAC-14265, Baltimore, MD, USA.

  • Ling, L. Y., Liang, L., & Pu, X. J. (2006). ATC based coordination of distributed production planning and supplier selection. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 182(2), 1154–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. C., Guignard, M., & Chen, C. H. (2001). A hybrid approach for integer programming combining genetic algorithms, linear programming and ordinal optimization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12(5–6), 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maravelias, C. T., & Sung, C. (2009). Integration of production planning and scheduling: Overview, challenges and opportunities. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 33(12), 1919–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyr, H., Wagner, M., & Rohde, J. (2002). Structure of advanced planning systems. In H. Stadtler & C. Kilger (Eds.), Supply chain management and advanced planning: Concepts, models software and case studies (2nd ed., pp. 99–104). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalek, J. J., & Papalambros, P. Y. (2005). An efficient weighting update method to achieve acceptable consistency deviation in analytical target cascading. Journal of Mechanical Design, 127(2), 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelena, N. F., Park, H. A., & Papalambros, P. Y. (2003). Convergence properties of analytical target cascading. AAIA Journal, 41(5), 897–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigro, G. L., Diega, S. N. L., Perrone, G., & Renna, P. (2003). Coordination policies to support decision making in distributed production planning. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(6), 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishi, T., & Konishi, M. (2005). An autonomous decentralized supply chain planning system for multi-stage production processes. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16(3), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, T., Huang, G. Q., Chen, X., & Chen, H. P. (2009). Extending analytical target cascading for optimal supply chain network configuration of a product family. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22(11), 1012–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, T., Huang, G. Q., Zhang, Y., & Dai, Q. Y. (2010a). A generic analytical target cascading optimization system for decentralized supply chain configuration over supply chain grid. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(2), 262–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, T., Huang, G. Q., Van-Dat, C., & Mangione, F. (2010b). Optimal configuration of assembly supply chains using analytical target cascading. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 6883–6907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifbarghy, M., & Esfandiari, N. (2013). Modeling and solving a multi-objective supplier quota allocation problem considering transaction costs. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(1), 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosserams, S., Etman, L., Papalambros, P., & Rooda, J. (2006). An augmented Lagrangian relaxation for analytical target cascading using the alternating direction method of multipliers. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 31(3), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, W., Song, F., & Ye, F. (2013). Order allocation for multiple supply-demand networks within a cluster. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0735-0.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Science and Technology Pillar Program of China (No: 2012BAF12B10), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (No: 2011A080404003) and the Guangdong Provincial Produce-learn-research Program, China (No: 2012B091100025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jieguang He or Xin Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Chen, X., Chen, X. et al. Distributed production planning based on ATC and MOILP considering different coordination patterns. J Intell Manuf 27, 1067–1084 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0935-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0935-2

Keywords

Navigation