Abstract
The two-agent scheduling problem has a wide range of applications in real world. Although uncertainty is ubiquitous in real world, research of the two-agent scheduling problem under uncertain environment is rare. For applications where historical data is not abundant, investigation of this problem under fuzzy environment is necessary. This paper studies the two-agent scheduling problem under fuzzy environment. We assume that the processing time of each job and the weights that the agents assign to the jobs are fuzzy variables, and focus on the problem where the cost of one agent is the maximum weighted completion time of her jobs and the cost of the other agent is the sum of the weighted completion time of her jobs. Based on three different decision criteria, we present three concepts of schedule and three fuzzy programming models respectively. In order to solve the proposed models, we design a hybrid intelligent algorithm that integrates fuzzy simulation with genetic algorithm. Numerical experiments are given to show the effectiveness of the models and the algorithm.




Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnetis, A., Mirchandani, P. B., Pacciarelli, D., & Pacifici, A. (2004). Scheduling problems with two competing agents. Operations Research, 52, 229–242.
Agnetis, A., Pascale, G., & Pacciarelli, D. (2009). A Lagrangian approach to single-machine scheduling problems with two competing agents. Journal of Scheduling, 12, 401–415.
Baker, K. R., & Smith, J. C. (2003). A multiple-criterion model for machine scheduling. Journal of Scheduling, 6, 7–16.
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73–79.
Chen, X., & Ralescu, D. (2013). Liu process and uncertain calculus. Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 1(3), 1–12.
Cheng, T. C. E., Cheng, S.-R., Wu, W.-H., Hsu, P.-H., & Wu, C.-C. (2011). A two-agent single-machine scheduling problem with truncated sum-of-processing-times-based learning considerations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(4), 534–541.
Cheng, T. C. E., Ng, C. T., & Yuan, J. J. (2006). Multi-agent scheduling on a single machine to minimize total weighted number of tardy jobs. Theoretical Computer Science, 362, 273–281.
Cheng, T. C. E., Ng, C. T., & Yuan, J. J. (2008). Multi-agent scheduling on a single machine with max-form criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 188, 603–609.
Cheng, T. C. E., Wu, W.-H., Cheng, S.-R., & Wu, C.-C. (2011). Two-agent scheduling with position-based deteriorating jobs and learning effects. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217(21), 8804–8824.
Elvikis, D., & T’kindt, V. (2014). Two-agent scheduling on uniform parallel machines with min–max criteria. Annals Of Operations Research, 213(1), 79–94.
Leung, J. Y.-T., Pinedo, M., & Wan, G. (2010). Competitive two-agent scheduling and its applications. Operations Research, 58(2), 458–469.
Liu, B. (1997). Dependent-chance programming: A class of stochastic optimization. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 34(12), 89–104.
Liu, B. (2002). Theory and practice of uncertain programming. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Liu, B. (2004). Uncertainty theory: An introduction to its axiomatic foundations. Berlin: Springer.
Liu, B. (2007). Uncertainty theory (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Liu, B. (2013). Toward uncertain finance theory. Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 1(1), 1–15.
Liu, B. (2013). Polyrectangular theorem and independence of uncertain vectors. Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 1(9), 1–9.
Liu, B. (2014). Uncertain random graph and uncertain random network. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 8(2), 3–12.
Liu, B., & Liu, Y.-K. (2002). Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10(4), 445–450.
Liu, P., Tang, L., & Zhou, X. (2010). Two-agent group scheduling with deteriorating jobs on a single machine. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 47(5–8), 657–664.
Liu, Y. K., & Gao, J. (2007). The independence of fuzzy variables in credibility theory and its applications. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness & Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(2), 1–20.
Mor, B., & Mosheiov, G. (2011). Single machine batch scheduling with two competing agents to minimize total flowtime. European Journal Of Operational Research, 215(3), 524–531.
Ng, C. T., Cheng, T. C. E., & Yuan, J. J. (2006). A note on the complexity of the problem of two-agent scheduling on a single machine. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 12, 387–394.
Ni, Y. (2008). Fuzzy minimum weight edge covering problem. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 32(7), 1327–1337.
Ni, Y. (2012). Minimum weight covering problems in stochastic environments. Information Sciences, 214, 91–104.
Ni, Y. (2013). Edge covering problem under hybrid uncertain environments. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(11), 6044–6052.
Ni, Y., & Liu, Z.-Q. (2011). Heuristic search for optimizing diffusion of influence in a social network under the resource constraint. Soft Computing, 15(2), 335–344.
Ni, Y., & Shi, Q. (2013). Minimizing the complete influence time in a social network with stochastic costs for influencing nodes. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(S1), 63–74.
Nong, Q. Q., Cheng, T. C. E., & Ng, C. T. (2011). Two-agent scheduling to minimize the total cost. European Journal of Operational Research, 215, 39–44.
Reis, J., Mamede, N., & O’Neill, H. (2001). Locally perceiving hard global constraints in multi-agent scheduling. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12(2), 223–236.
Sheng, Y., & Yao, K. (2014). Some formulas of variance of uncertain random variable. Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 2(12), 1–12.
Wan, G., Vakati, S. R., Leung, J. Y.-T., & Pinedo, M. (2010). Scheduling two agents with controllable processing times. European Journal Of Operational Research, 205(3), 528–539.
Wu, C.-C., Huang, S.-K., & Lee, W.-C. (2011). Two-agent scheduling with learning consideration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(4), 1324–1335.
Wu, W.-H., Cheng, S.-R., Wu, C.-C., & Yin, Y. (2011). Ant colony algorithms for a two-agent scheduling with sum-of processing times-based learning and deteriorating considerations. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(5), 1985–1993.
Yang, L., Li, K., & Gao, Z. (2009). Train timetable problem on a single-line railway with fuzzy passenger demand. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 17(3), 617–629.
Yang, L., Li, K., Gao, Z., & Li, X. (2012). Optimizing trains movement on a railway network. Omega, 40, 619–633.
Yang, L., Zhou, X., & Gao, Z. (2014). Credibility-based rescheduling model in a double-track railway network: A fuzzy reliable optimization approach. Omega, 26(1–2), 249–267.
Yang, X., & Gao, J. (2013). Uncertain differential games with application to capitalism. Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 1(17), 1–11.
Yang, X., & Gao, J. (2014). Uncertain core for coalitional game with uncertain payoffs. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 8(2), 13–21.
Yao, K. (2013). Extreme values and integral of solution of uncertain differential equation. Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 1(2), 1–21.
Yin, Y., Cheng, S.-R., Cheng, T. C. E., Wu, W.-H., & Wu, C.-C. (2013). Two-agent single-machine scheduling with release times and deadlines. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5(1), 75–94.
Yin, Y., Wu, W.-H., Cheng, S.-R., & Wu, C.-C. (2012). An investigation on a two-agent single-machine scheduling problem with unequal release dates. Computers & Operations Research, 39(12), 3062–3073.
Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 3–28.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71471038, 71101027), Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project (No. YETP0909) and Program for Young Excellent Talents, UIBE (No. 12YQ08).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ni, Y., Zhao, Z. Two-agent scheduling problem under fuzzy environment. J Intell Manuf 28, 739–748 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0992-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0992-6