Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An effective hybrid evolutionary algorithm for stochastic multiobjective assembly line balancing problem

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stochastic assembly line balancing distributes tasks with uncertain processing times at each station so that precedence relationship constraints are satisfied and a given objective function is optimized. In real assembly line balancing systems, the stochastic, multiobjective, assembly line balancing (S-MoALB) problem is an important and practical issue involving conflicting criteria, such as cycle time, processing cost, and/or variation of workload. In this paper, we propose an effective hybrid evolutionary algorithm (hEA) to solve an S-MoALB problem involving the minimization of cycle time and processing cost for a fixed number of stations. The hEA implements a simple mechanism to select Pareto optimal solutions between the Pareto-dominating and dominated relationship-based fitness function and the vector evaluated genetic algorithm to enhance the convergence and distribution performance. The experimental results show that our hEA achieves better convergence and distribution performance than two typical multiple objective genetic algorithms such as the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II and the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cakir, B., Altiparmak, F., & Dengiz, B. (2011). Multi-objective optimization of a stochastic assembly line balancing: A hybrid simulated annealing algorithm. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 60(3), 376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazlollahtabar, H., Hajmohammadi, H., & Es’haghzadeh, A. (2011). A heuristic methodology for assembly line balancing considering stochastic time and validity testing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52(1–4), 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gen, M., & Cheng, R. (2000). Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gen, M., Cheng, R., & Lin, L. (2008). Network models and optimization: Multiobjective genetic algorithm approach. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gen, M., & Lin, L. (2014). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for manufacturing scheduling problems: State-of-the-art survey. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(5), 849–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamta, N., Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T., Jolai, F., & Bahalke, U. (2011). Bi-criteria assembly line balancing by considering flexible operation times. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(12), 5592–5608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazır, Ö., & Dolgui, A. (2013). Assembly line balancing under uncertainty: Robust optimization models and exact solution method. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 65(2), 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian, E., & Ko, J. (2013). Robust manufacturing line design with controlled moderate robustness in bottleneck buffer time to manage stochastic inter-task times. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(2), 382–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, S. C., Erel, E., & Dar-El, E. M. (1999). A methodology for solving single-model, stochastic assembly line balancing problem. Omega, 27(5), 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, A. (1993). Data of assembly line balancing problems, Schriften zur Quantitativen Betriebswirtschaftslehre 16/93, The Darmstadt.

  • Zhang, W., & Fujimura, S. (2012). Multiobjective process planning and scheduling using improved vector evaluated genetic algorithm with archive. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 7(3), 258–267.

  • Zhang, W., Gen, M., & Jo, J. B. (2014). Hybrid sampling strategy-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for process planning and scheduling problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(5), 881–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., & Thiele, L. (2001). SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation, and Control.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1304609, 61174056), the Key Young Teacher Training Program of Henan University of Technology, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Henan Provincial Colleges and Universities (No. 2014YWQQ12), and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Sci. Res. (C) (No. 24510219).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenqiang Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Xu, W., Liu, G. et al. An effective hybrid evolutionary algorithm for stochastic multiobjective assembly line balancing problem. J Intell Manuf 28, 783–790 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1037-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1037-5

Keywords

Navigation