Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Indirect tool monitoring in drilling based on gap sensor signal and multilayer perceptron feed forward neural network

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In this study, an indirect tool monitoring was developed based on the installation of a gap sensor in measuring the signal related to the tool behavior during the drilling process. Eleven types of twist drills with different tool conditions were utilized to differentiate the sensorial signals based on the tool states. A statistical analysis was conducted in the signal processing, by extracting the gap sensor signal associates from each tool condition, using the skewness and kurtosis features. Multi-class classification was conducted using the multilayer perceptron (MLP) feed forward neural network (FF-NN) model to classify and predict the tool condition based on the skewness and kurtosis data. The architectures of the MLP FF-NN models were varied to optimize the classification accuracy. This study found that the tool condition was correlated to the displacement of the drill machine spindle because the runout occurred when the sensor signal displayed fluctuation and irregularity trends. The peak intensity of the gap sensor signals increased with increasing wear severity of the twist drill. An ideal MLP FF-NN structure was achieved when the classification performance was optimized to be consistent with the learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Mahfouz, I. (2003). Drilling wear detection and classification using vibration signal and artificial neural network. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 43(7), 707–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baturynska, I., & Martinsen, K. (2020). Prediction of geometry deviations in additive manufactured parts: comparison of linear regression with machine learning algorithms. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01567-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benardos, P. G., & Vosniakos, G.-C. (2007). Optimizing feedforward artificial neural network architecture. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20(30), 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat, R., Abdolahnejad, M., & Moocarme, M. (2019). Applied deep learning with keras: Solve complex real-life problems with the simplicity of keras. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. M. (1995). Neural Networks for pattern recognition (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, B., Kelly, K., & Byrne, G. (2002). AI-based condition monitoring of the drilling process. Journal of Materials Processing and Technology, 124(3), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caggiano, A., Napolitano, F., Nele, L., & Teti, R. (2018). Multiple sensor monitoring for tool wear forecast in drilling of CFRP/CFRP stacks with traditional and innovative drill bits. Procedia CIRP, 67, 404–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Chen, W. (2019). Electricity price prediction based on hybrid model of adam optimized LSTM neural network and wavelet transform. Energy, 187, 115804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. J., Park, M. S., & Chu, C. N. (2008). Prediction of drill failure using features extraction in time and frequency domains of feed motor current. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 48(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chungchoo, C., & Saini, D. (2002). On-line tool wear estimation in CNC turning operations using fuzzy neural network model. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 42, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, G. E., Sainath, T. N., & Hinton, G. E. (2013). Improving deep neural networks for LVCSR using rectified linear units and dropout. In 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (pp. 8609–8613), IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6639346.

  • Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2012). Data mining concepts and techniques (3rd ed.). Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegde, C., Millwater, H., & Gray, K. (2019). Classification of drilling stick slip severity using machine learning. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 179, 1023–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, R., & Hinduja, S. (2012). A new strategy for tool condition monitoring of small diameter twist drills in deep-hole drilling. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 52, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, P., Ma, C., & Kuo, C. (2015). A PNN self-learning tool breakage detection system in end milling operations. Applied Soft Computing, 37, 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen, E., El-Thalji, I., Baglee, D., & Lagö, T. L. (2014). Problems with using Fast Fourier Transform for rotating equipment: Is it time for an update? In Comadem 2014: 27th international congress of condition monitoring and diagnostic engineering, Brisbane, Australia https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2679.136363.

  • Jantunen, E., & Jokinen, H. (1996). Automated on-line diagnosis of cutting tool condition (second version). International Journal of Flexible Automation and Integrated Manufacturing, 4(3–4), 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, W., Yin, S., & Wang, L. (2019). A big data analytics based machining optimization approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30, 1483–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, J., & Liu, X. (2008). Empirical analysis of optimal hidden neurons in neural network modeling for stock prediction. In 2008 IEEE Pacific-Asia workshop on computational intelligence and industrial application (pp. 828–832). Wuhan, China: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIIA.2008.363.

  • Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A Method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd international conference for learning representations. San Diego, USA. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1412.6980.

  • Klaic, M., Staroveski, T., & Udiljak, T. (2014). Tool wear classification using decision trees in stone drilling applications: A preliminary study. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1326–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaic, M., Murat, Z., Staroveski, T., & Brezak, D. (2018). Tool wear monitoring in rock drilling applications using vibration signals. Wear, 408–409, 22–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotu, V., & Deshpande, B. (2015). Predictive analytics and data mining: Concepts and practice with Rapid miner (1st ed.). Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurada, S., & Bradley, C. (1997). A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring. Computers in Industry, 34, 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeChun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Zhang, W., & Ding, Q. (2019a). Understanding and improving deep learning-based rolling bearing fault diagnosis with attention mechanism. Signal Processing, 161, 136–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Liu, R., & Wu, D. (2019b). Data-driven smart manufacturing: Tool wear monitoring with audio signals and machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 48, 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Kittikunakorn, N., Sorman, B., Xi, H., Chen, A., Marsh, M., Mongeau, A., Piché, N., Williams, I. I. I., R. O. & Skomski, D. (2020). Application of deep learning convolutional neural networks for internal table defect detection: High accuracy, throughput, and adaptability. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2020.01.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanraj, T., Shankar, S., Rajasekar, R., Sakthivel, N. R., & Pramanik, A. (2020). Tool condition monitoring techniques in milling process—A review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9(1), 1032–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Baese, A., & Schmid, V. (2014). Pattern recognition and signal analysis in medical imaging (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, M. K., Allen, T., & Appiah, K. (2019). A comparative review of dynamic neural networks and hidden Markov model methods for mobile on-device speech recognition. Neural Computing and Applications, 31, 891–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noori-Khajavi, A., & Komanduri, R. (1993). On multisensor approach to drill wear monitoring. CIRP Annals, 42(1), 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra, K., Jha, A. K., Szalay, T., Ranjan, J., & Monostori, L. (2017). Artificial neural network based tool condition monitoring in micro mechanical peck drilling using thrust force signals. Precision Engineering, 48, 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, A. P., Napiorkowski, J. J., & Piotrowska, A. E. (2020). Impact of deep learning-based dropout on shallow neural network applied to stream temperature modelling. Earth-Science Reviews, 201, 103076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y., Quan, P., Lei, M., & Shi, Y. (2019). Review of bankruptcy prediction using machine learning and deep learning. Procedia Computer Science, 162, 895–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizal, M., Ghani, J. A., Nuawi, M. Z., & Haron, C. H. C. (2013). The application of I-kazTM-based method for tool wear monitoring using cutting force signal. Procedia Engineering, 68, 461–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanjay, C., Neema, M. L., & Chin, C. W. (2005). Modelling of tool wear in drilling by statistical analysis and artificial neural network. Journal of Materials Processing and Technology, 170(3), 494–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheela, K. G., & Deepa, S. N. (2013). Review on methods to fix number of hidden neurons in neural networks. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/425740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, K., & Ikeda, Y. (2009). Effect of number of hidden neurons on learning in large-scale layered neural networks. In ICROS-SICE international joint conference 2009 (ICCASSICE’09) (pp. 5008–5013). Fukuoka, Japan.

  • Simon, G. D., & Deivanathan, R. (2019). Early detection of drilling tool wear by vibration data acquisition and classification. Manufacturing Letters, 21, 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soederberg, S., Vingsbo, O., & Nissle, M. (1982). Performance and failure of high speed steel drills related to wear. Wear, 75, 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, C., Straffor, K. N., Wilks, T. P., Ward, L. P., & McPhee, M. A. (1993). Performance evaluation of TiN-coated twist drills using force measurement and microscopy. Surface and Coatings Technology, 62, 641–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susai, M. J., Sai, B. M. A., Krishnakumari, A., Nakandhrakumar, R. S., & Dinakaran, D. (2019). Monitoring of drill runout using Least Square Support Vector Machine classifier. Measurement, 146, 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansel, I. N., Mekdeci, C., Rodriguez, O., & Uragun, B. (1993). Monitoring drill conditions with wavelet based encoding and neural networks. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 33(4), 559–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Váňa, Z., Prívara, S., Cigler, J., & Preisig, H. A. (2011). System identification using wavelet analysis. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 29, 763–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Cheng, K., Rakowski, R., & Soulard, J. (2018). An experimental investigation on ultra-precision instrumented smart aerostatic bearing spindle applied to high speed micro-drilling. Journal of Manufacturing Process, 31, 324–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widodo, A., & Yang, B. S. (2007). Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21, 2560–2574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., & Xue, W. (2018). Review of tool condition monitoring methods in milling processes. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 96, 2509–2523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., Wong, Y. S., & &Hong, G. S. (2009). Wavelet analysis of sensor signals for tool condition monitoring: A review and some new results. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 49, 537–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., & Yu, X. (2017). The monitoring of micro milling tool wear conditions by wear area estimation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 93, 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by “Prolonged unmanned demonstration of a line-center” of the Ministry of Trade Industry and Energy (MOTIE), Korea (Grant No. 20007221). The authors would like to acknowledge this funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nano Fusion Technology, Pusan National University, 2 Busandaehak-ro, 63beon-gil, Geumjeonggu, 46241, Republic of Korea

    Siti Nurfadilah Binti Jaini & Seung-Jun Lee

  2. Department of Nano Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, 2 Busandaehak-ro, 63beon-gil, Geumjeonggu, 46241, Republic of Korea

    Deug-Woo Lee

  3. Precision Mechanical Process and Control R&D Group, Dongnam Division, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), 25, Yeonkkot- ro, 165beon-gil, Jeongchon-myeon, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52845, Republic of Korea

    Mi-Ru Kim

  4. Doosan Machine Tools, 40, Jeongdong-ro 162beon-gil, Seongsan-gu, Changwon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 51537, Republic of Korea

    Gil-Ho Son

Authors
  1. Siti Nurfadilah Binti Jaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deug-Woo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seung-Jun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mi-Ru Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gil-Ho Son
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deug-Woo Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaini, S.N.B., Lee, DW., Lee, SJ. et al. Indirect tool monitoring in drilling based on gap sensor signal and multilayer perceptron feed forward neural network. J Intell Manuf 32, 1605–1619 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01635-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01635-5

Keywords