Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fuzzy traceability: using domain knowledge information to estimate the followed route of process instances in non-exhaustive monitoring environments

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the frame of the process monitoring domain, traceability in environments with non-exhaustive event logs remains as a challenge. In these scenarios, the discovery of the route followed by a particular item along the entire process is a difficult task since it is not possible to access all the required pieces of information from processes under monitorization. To tackle this issue, the concept of fuzzy traceability is brought into the scene. The gist of the latter is to use contextual information derived from the domain of interest itself to infer the most probable route followed. To carry out this task, the proposed algorithm takes advantage of additional sources of machine readable information that describes in a more detailed manner the process models under study. This information is included in the process models using the advanced features supported by the BPMN-E2 (Business Process Model and Notation - Enhanced Expressiveness) specification, an extension of the well-known BPMN notation. In this way , it is possible to properly use as inputs: time restrictions of the activities included in the process; decision-making and monitoring points included; and the effects derived from the activities undergone. As a consequence, a probabilistic estimation of the route followed is generated by combining this information according to the presented algorithm. After the validation and simulation of the fuzzy traceability algorithm using real-world models, the results obtained are positive and show that, as the contextual information included grows, the route estimation gets more acurated. This high success rate suggests that the fuzzy traceability proposal is useful for the analysis of processes with poor quality of monitoring information, and outdoes the application of more conventional traceability techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accorsi, R., & Stocker, T. (2012). On the exploitation of process mining for security audits: The conformance checking case. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 1709–1716). ACM.

  • Alonso-Rorís, V. M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L. M., Santos-Gago, J. M., & Ramos-Merino, M. (2016). Towards a cost-effective and reusable traceability system. A semantic approach. Computers in Industry, 83, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Rorís, V. M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L. M., Wanden-Berghe, C., Santos-Gago, J. M., & Sanz-Valero, J. (2016). Towards a mobile-based platform for traceability control and hazard analysis in the context of parenteral nutrition: Description of a framework and a prototype app. JMIR Research Protocols, 5(2), e57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Rorís, V. M., Santos-Gago, J. M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L. M., Ramos-Merino, M., & Sanz-Valero, J. (2016). An ICT-based platform to monitor protocols in the healthcare environment. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(10), 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya, V., Deshmukh, S., & Bhatnagar, N. (2019). Product quality in an inclusive manufacturing system: Some considerations. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(8), 2871–2884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badia-Melis, R., Mishra, P., & Ruiz-García, L. (2015). Food traceability: New trends and recent advances. A review. Food Control, 57, 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernabeu-Martínez, M. A., Ramos-Merino, M., Santos-Gago, J. M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L. M., Wanden-Berghe, C., & Sanz-Valero, J. (2018). Guidelines for safe handling of hazardous drugs: A systematic review. PloS One, 13(5), e0197172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bougdira, A., Ahaitouf, A., & Akharraz, I. (2016). Towards an intelligent traceability system. In 2016 international conference on information technology for organizations development (IT4OD) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.

  • Cadavid, J. P. U., Lamouri, S., Grabot, B., Pellerin, R., & Fortin, A. (2020). Machine learning applied in production planning and control: A state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, J. A., & Hooker, N. H. (1996). HACCP as an international trade standard. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 775–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. Y. (2015). Autonomous tracing system for backward design in food supply chain. Food Control, 51, 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. Y. (2017). An intelligent value stream-based approach to collaboration of food traceability cyber physical system by fog computing. Food Control, 71, 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalhammar, C. (2016). Industry attitudes towards ecodesign standards for improved resource efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2012). Repairing process models to reflect reality. In International conference on business process management (pp. 229–245). Springer, Berlin.

  • Ferreira, D. R., Szimanski, F., & Ralha, C. G. (2014). Improving process models by mining mappings of low-level events to high-level activities. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 43(2), 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Organic Textile Standard International Working Group. (2008). Global organic textile standard version, 2.

  • Gupta, K. S., & Rokade, V. (2016). Importance of quality in health care sector: A review. Journal of Health Management, 18(1), 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdi, F., Ghorbel, A., Masmoudi, F., & Dupont, L. (2018). Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: Literature review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(4), 763–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, N., Kunze, M., & Rogge-Solti, A. (2019). Process intelligence in health care. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from http://pige-projekt.de/.

  • Herzberg, N., Kunze, M., & Rogge-Solti, A. (2012). Towards process evaluation in non-automated process execution environments. In: ZEUS (pp. 97–103). Citeseer.

  • Kuhnle, A., Kaiser, J. P., Theiß, F., Stricker, N., & Lanza, G. (2020). Designing an adaptive production control system using reinforcement learning. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 1–22.

  • Leemans, M., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2014). Discovery of frequent episodes in event logs. In International symposium on data-driven process discovery and analysis (pp. 1–31). Springer.

  • Michal, J., Březina, D., Šafařík, D., Kupčák, V., Sujová, A., & Fialová, J. (2019). Analysis of socioeconomic impacts of the FSC and PEFC certification systems on business entities and consumers. Sustainability, 11(15), 4122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musa, A., Gunasekaran, A., & Yusuf, Y. (2014). Supply chain product visibility: Methods, systems and impacts. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(1), 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutilba, U., Gomez-Acedo, E., Kortaberria, G., Olarra, A., & Yagüe-Fabra, J. (2017). Traceability of on-machine tool measurement: A review. Sensors, 17(7), 1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolae, C. G., Neculita, M., & Cristea, D. S. (2014). Trends in the development of traceability systems for fish products. Calitatea, 15(143), 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, L. J. R., Godina, R., & Matias, J. C. D. O. (2019). Technological innovation in biomass energy for the sustainable growth of textile industry. Sustainability, 11(2), 528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Object Management Group. (2011). Business Process Model And Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 (2011). Version 2.0.

  • Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2018). Literature review of industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Merino, M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L. M., Santos-Gago, J. M., & Alonso-Rorís, V. M. (2016). Extending BPMN model for improving expressiveness and machine-understandability. In New advances in information systems and technologies (pp. 297–306). Springer

  • Ramos-Merino, M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L. M., Santos-Gago, J. M., & Arriba-Pérez, F. D. (2019). A pattern based method for simplifying a BPMN process model. Applied Sciences, 9(11), 2322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Merino, M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L. M., Santos-Gago, J. M., & Sanz-Valero, J. (2018). A BPMN based notation for the representation of workflows in hospital protocols. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(10), 181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Merino, M., Santos-Gago, J. M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L. M., Alonso-Roris, V. M., & Sanz-Valero, J. (2019). BPMN-E 2: A BPMN extension for an enhanced workflow description. Software and Systems Modeling, 18(4), 2399–2419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozinat, A., & Van der Aalst, W. M. (2005). Conformance testing: Measuring the fit and appropriateness of event logs and process models. In International conference on business process management (pp. 163–176). Springer.

  • Ryen, E. G., Babbitt, C. W., & Williams, E. (2015). Consumption-weighted life cycle assessment of a consumer electronic product community. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(4), 2549–2559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, H. (2017). Traceability in french and european law. In Food traceability and authenticity (pp. 48–65). CRC Press.

  • Van der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., & van Dongen, B. (2012). Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(2), 182–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., De Medeiros, A. K. A., Arcieri, F., Baier, T., Blickle, T., Bose, J. C., van den Brand, P., Brandtjen, R., & Buijs, J., et al. (2011). Process mining manifesto. In International conference on business process management (pp. 169–194). Springer.

  • Vázquez-Barreiros, B., Mucientes, M., & Lama, M. (2015). Prodigen: Mining complete, precise and minimal structure process models with a genetic algorithm. Information Sciences, 294, 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Ting, J. S., & Ip, W. (2013). Design of supply-chain pedigree interactive dynamic explore (SPIDER) for food safety and implementation of hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCPS). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 90, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Yue, H., & Zhou, Z. (2017). An improved traceability system for food quality assurance and evaluation based on fuzzy classification and neural network. Food Control, 79, 363–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, T. (2020). FSC as a social standard for conservation and the sustainable use of forests: FSC legitimation strategy in competition. In International development and the environment (pp. 55–67). Springer.

  • Weerapong, S., Porouhan, P., & Premchaiswadi, W. (2012). Process mining using \(\alpha \)-algorithm as a tool (a case study of student registration). In 2012 tenth international conference on ICT and knowledge engineering (pp. 213–220). IEEE.

  • Zhang, K., Chai, Y., Yang, S. X., & Weng, D. (2011). Pre-warning analysis and application in traceability systems for food production supply chains. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2500–2507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, R. Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E., & Newman, S. T. (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: A review. Engineering, 3(5), 616–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Telematics Engineering Department, Universidade de Vigo, Escola de Enxeñaría de Telecomunicación, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310, Vigo, Spain

    Mateo Ramos-Merino, Juan M. Santos-Gago & Luis M. Álvarez-Sabucedo

Authors
  1. Mateo Ramos-Merino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan M. Santos-Gago
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luis M. Álvarez-Sabucedo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mateo Ramos-Merino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramos-Merino, M., Santos-Gago, J.M. & Álvarez-Sabucedo, L.M. Fuzzy traceability: using domain knowledge information to estimate the followed route of process instances in non-exhaustive monitoring environments. J Intell Manuf 32, 2235–2255 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01636-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01636-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation