Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Designing energy-efficient high-precision multi-pass turning processes via robust optimization and artificial intelligence

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper suggests a novel robust formulation designed for optimizing the parameters of the turning process in an uncertain environment for the first time. The aim is to achieve the lowest energy consumption and highest precision. With this aim, the current paper considers uncertain parameters, objective functions, and constraints in the offered mathematical model. We proposed several uncertain models and validated the results in real-world case studies. In addition, several artificial intelligence-based solution techniques are designed to solve the complex nonlinear problem. We determined the most efficient solution approach by solving various test problems. Then, simulated several scenarios to demonstrate the robustness of our results. The results showed that the solutions provided by the offered model significantly reduce energy consumption in different setups. To ensure the reliability of the results, we carried out worst-case sensitivity analyses and found the most critical parameters. The results of the worst-case analyses indicated that the offered robust model is efficient and saves a significant amount of energy comparing to traditional models. It is shown that the provided solution by the presented robust formulation is reliable in all situations and results in the lowest energy and the best machining precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahilan, C., Kumanan, S., Sivakumaran, N., & Dhas, J. E. R. (2013). Modeling and prediction of machining quality in CNC turning process using intelligent hybrid decision making tools. Applied Soft Computing, 13(3), 1543–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif, M., Stroud, I. A., & Akten, O. (2014). A model to determine the optimal parameters for sustainable-energy machining in a multi-pass turning operation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 228(6), 866–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413508945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, P., Pant, M., & Deep, K. (2015). Parameter optimization of multi-pass turning using chaotic PSO. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 6(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-013-0221-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. C. (2004). Optimizing machining economics models of turning operations using the scatter search approach. International Journal of Production Research, 42(13), 2611–2625. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540410001666251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. C., & Tsai, D. M. (1996). A simulated annealing approach for optimization of multi-pass turning operations. International Journal of Production Research, 34(10), 2803–2825. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549608905060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De, A., Mogale, D. G., Zhang, M., Pratap, S., Kumar, S. K., & Huang, G. Q. (2020). Multi-period multi-echelon inventory transportation problem considering stakeholders behavioural tendencies. International Journal of Production Economics, 225, 107566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diyaley, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2019). Metaheuristics-based parametric optimization of multi-pass turning process: A comparative analysis. OPSEARCH, 57, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elishakoff, I., & Elettro, F. (2014). Interval, ellipsoidal, and super-ellipsoidal calculi for experimental and theoretical treatment of uncertainty: Which one ought to be preferred? International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51(7–8), 1576–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, K., Uhan, N., Zhao, F., & Sutherland, J. W. (2011). A new approach to scheduling in manufacturing for power consumption and carbon footprint reduction. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 30(4), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrokh, M., Azar, A., Jandaghi, G., & Ahmadi, E. (2018). A novel robust fuzzy stochastic programming for closed loop supply chain network design under hybrid uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 341, 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazli-Khalaf, M., Khalilpourazari, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Mixed robust possibilistic flexible chance constraint optimization model for emergency blood supply chain network design. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2729-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi Doulabi, H., Jaillet, P., Pesant, G., & Rousseau, L. M. (2020b). Exploiting the structure of two-stage robust optimization models with exponential scenarios. INFORMS Journal on Computing. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2019.0928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi Doulabi, H., Pesant, G., & Rousseau, L. M. (2020a). Vehicle routing problems with synchronized visits and stochastic travel and service times: Applications in healthcare. Transportation Science, 54(4), 1053–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inuiguchi, M., & Ramık, J. (2000). Possibilistic linear programming: A brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 111(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurkovic, Z., Cukor, G., Brezocnik, M., & Brajkovic, T. (2018). A comparison of machine learning methods for cutting parameters prediction in high speed turning process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(8), 1683–1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalilpourazari, S., & Khalilpourazary, S. (2017). A lexicographic weighted Tchebycheff approach for multi-constrained multi-objective optimization of the surface grinding process. Engineering Optimization, 49(5), 878–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2016.1214437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalilpourazari, S., Mirzazadeh, A., Weber, G. W., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2020a). A robust fuzzy approach for constrained multi-product economic production quantity with imperfect items and rework process. Optimization, 69, 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalilpourazari, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2016, January). Optimization of closed-loop Supply chain network design: A Water Cycle Algorithm approach. In 2016 12th international conference on industrial engineering (ICIE) (pp. 41–45). IEEE.

  • Khalilpourazari, S., Naderi, B., & Khalilpourazary, S. (2020b). Multi-Objective Stochastic Fractal Search: A powerful algorithm for solving complex multi-objective optimization problems. Soft Computing, 24(4), 3037–3066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalilpourazari, S., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2016, January). Bi-objective optimization of multi-product EPQ model with backorders, rework process and random defective rate. In 2016 12th international conference on industrial engineering (ICIE) (pp. 36–40). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/induseng.2016.7519346

  • Khalilpourazari, S., & Pasandideh, S. H. R. (2020). Sine–cosine crow search algorithm: Theory and applications. Neural Computing and Applications, 32,32, 7725–7742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalilpourazari, S., Pasandideh, S. H. R., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2019). Optimizing a multi-item economic order quantity problem with imperfect items, inspection errors, and backorders. Soft Computing, 23(22), 11671–11698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalilpourazari, S., Soltanzadeh, S., Weber, G. W., & Roy, S. K. (2020c). Designing an efficient blood supply chain network in crisis: Neural learning, optimization and case study. Annals of Operations Research, 289, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishtandar, S. (2019). Simulation based evolutionary algorithms for fuzzy chance-constrained biogas supply chain design. Applied Energy, 236, 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropat, E., Weber, G. W., Alparslan-Gök, S. Z., & Özmen, A. (2014). Inverse problems in complex multi-modal regulatory networks based on uncertain clustered data. In A. Pinto & D. Zilberman (Eds.), Modeling, dynamics, optimization and bioeconomics I (pp. 437–451). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Bilga, P. S., & Singh, S. (2017). Multi objective optimization using different methods of assigning weights to energy consumption responses, surface roughness and material removal rate during rough turning operation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalmazloumian, M., Wong, K. Y., Govindan, K., & Kannan, D. (2016). A robust optimization model for agile and build-to-order supply chain planning under uncertainties. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 435–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1421-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., Cui, L., Liu, F., & Li, L. (2013). Multi-objective NC machining parameters optimization model for high efficiency and low carbon. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao (Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering), 49(9), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., & Forrest, J. Y. L. (2010). Grey systems: Theory and applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., & Iwamura, K. (1998). Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00236-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Li, X., Wu, D., Qian, Z., Feng, P., & Rong, Y. (2019). The development of a hybrid firefly algorithm for multi-pass grinding process optimization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(6), 2457–2472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C., Gao, L., Li, X., & Chen, P. (2016). Energy-efficient multi-pass turning operation using multi-objective backtracking search algorithm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1516–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McParland, D., Baron, S., O’Rourke, S., Dowling, D., Ahearne, E., & Parnell, A. (2019). Prediction of tool-wear in turning of medical grade cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy (ASTM F75) using non-parametric Bayesian models. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(3), 1259–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogale, D. G., Cheikhrouhou, N., & Tiwari, M. K. (2020). Modelling of sustainable food grain supply chain distribution system: A bi-objective approach. International Journal of Production Research, 58(18), 5521–5544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1669840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogale, D. G., Ghadge, A., Kumar, S. K., & Tiwari, M. K. (2019). Modelling supply chain network for procurement of food grains in India. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1682707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, M., & Khalilpourazari, S. (2017, February). Minimizing makespan in a single machine scheduling problem with deteriorating jobs and learning effects. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on software and computer applications (pp. 310–315).

  • Onwubolu, G. C., & Kumalo, T. (2001). Optimization of multipass turning operations with genetic algorithms. International Journal of Production Research, 39(16), 3727–3745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110056153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phuc, P. N. K., Vincent, F. Y., & Tsao, Y. C. (2017). Optimizing fuzzy reverse supply chain for end-of-life vehicles. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishvaee, M. S., & Khalaf, M. F. (2016). Novel robust fuzzy mathematical programming methods. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(1), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.04.054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishvaee, M. S., Razmi, J., & Torabi, S. A. (2012). Robust possibilistic programming for socially responsible supply chain network design: A new approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 206, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani, M., Hosseini-Mokhallesun, S. A. A., Ordibazar, A. H., & Farrokhi-Asl, H. (2020). A hybrid robust possibilistic approach for a sustainable supply chain location-allocation network design. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 7(1), 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radovanović, M. (2019). Multi-objective optimization of multi-pass turning AISI 1064 steel. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 100(1–4), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramezani, M., Kimiagari, A. M., Karimi, B., & Hejazi, T. H. (2014). Closed-loop supply chain network design under a fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 59, 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.01.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. V., & Kalyankar, V. D. (2013). Multi-pass turning process parameter optimization using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Scientia Iranica, 20(3), 967–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodić, D., Sekulić, M., Gostimirović, M., Pucovsky, V., & Kramar, D. (2020). Fuzzy logic and sub-clustering approaches to predict main cutting force in high-pressure jet assisted turning. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01555-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi, F., Mahootchi, M., & Husseini, S. M. M. (2017). Developing a robust stochastic model for designing a blood supply chain network in a crisis: A possible earthquake in Tehran. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2533-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savku, E., & Weber, G. W. (2018). A stochastic maximum principle for a markov regime-switching jump-diffusion model with delay and an application to finance. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 179(2), 696–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y. C., & Joo, Y. S. (1992). Optimization of machining conditions with practical constraints. The International Journal of Production Research, 30(12), 2907–2919. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549208948198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, J., Giri, R., & Yang, S. H. (2009). Optimization of multi-pass turning using particle swarm intelligence. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 40(1–2), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1320-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi, S. A., & Hassini, E. (2008). An interactive possibilistic programming approach for multiple objective supply chain master planning. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2007.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosarkani, B. M., Amin, S. H., & Zolfagharinia, H. (2019). A scenario-based robust possibilistic model for a multi-objective electronic reverse logistics network. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toufik, A. (2020). Multi-objective particle swarm algorithm for the posterior selection of machining parameters in multi-pass turning. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2020.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, Y. C., & Thanh, V. V. (2019). A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 124, 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayakumar, K., Prabhaharan, G., Asokan, P., & Saravanan, R. (2003). Optimization of multi-pass turning operations using ant colony system. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 43(15), 1633–1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00081-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. K. (2006). Mechanical processing handbook. Beijing: China Machine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Liu, F., & Wang, X. (2014). Multi-objective optimization of machining parameters considering energy consumption. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71(5–8), 1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5547-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Tian, J., Wang, R., Xu, J., Chen, S., Wang, J., et al. (2019). Multi-objective economic dispatch of cogeneration unit with heat storage based on fuzzy chance constraint. Energies, 12(1), 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, G. W., Gök, S. Z. A., & Kropat, E. (2011). Recent advances on ellipsoidal cooperative Games. In GAME THEORY AND MANAGEMENT. Collected abstracts of papers presented on the fifth international conference game theory and management/editors Leon A. Petrosyan and Nikolay A. Zenkevich.–SPb.: Graduate School of Management SPbU, 2011.–268 p. The collection contains abstracts of papers accepted for the fifth international (p. 255).

  • Weber, G. W., Kropat, E., & Alparslan Gök, S. Z. (2008, May). Semi-infinite and conic optimization in modern human life and financial sciences under uncertainty. In ISI proceedings of 20th mini-EURO conference (pp. 180–185). Neringa: Continuous Optimization and Knowledge-Based Technologies.

  • Weiss, E. B. (1992). United Nations conference on environment and development. International Legal Materials, 31(4), 814–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., Wang, Y., & Huang, F. (2017). Optimization of multi-pass turning parameters through an improved flower pollination algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 89(1–4), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9112-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. H., & Natarajan, U. (2010). Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in turning process using differential evolution and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II approaches. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 49(5–8), 773–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, M. H., Özmen, A., Bayrak, Ö. T., & Weber, G. W. (2012). Electricity price modelling for Turkey. In D. Klatte, H. J. Lüthi, & K. Schmedders (Eds.), Operations research proceedings 2011 (pp. 39–44). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, A. R. (2012). A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for turning operations. Information Sciences, 210, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, A. R. (2013). Optimization of cutting parameters in multi-pass turning using artificial bee colony-based approach. Information Sciences, 220, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, C., Zhai, Q., & Dornfeld, D. (2012). A three dimensional system approach for environmentally sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 61(1), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, G. Y., Liu, Z. Y., He, Y., Cao, H. J., & Guo, Y. B. (2017). Energy consumption in machining: Classification, prediction, and reduction strategy. Energy, 133, 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Q., Tang, R., & Peng, T. (2017). Decision rules for energy consumption minimization during material removal process in turning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1819–1827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Ahn, S., Chitturi, M., & Noyce, D. A. (2017). Rolling horizon stochastic optimal control strategy for ACC and CACC under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 83, 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Engineering (MIAE), Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

    Soheyl Khalilpourazari

  2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran

    Saman Khalilpourazary

  3. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45140, Manisa, Turkey

    Aybike Özyüksel Çiftçioğlu

  4. Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Strzelecka, 1160-965, Poznan, Poland

    Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber

  5. Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT), Montreal, Canada

    Soheyl Khalilpourazari

  6. Institute of Applied Mathematics, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey

    Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber

Authors
  1. Soheyl Khalilpourazari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saman Khalilpourazary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aybike Özyüksel Çiftçioğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soheyl Khalilpourazari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalilpourazari, S., Khalilpourazary, S., Özyüksel Çiftçioğlu, A. et al. Designing energy-efficient high-precision multi-pass turning processes via robust optimization and artificial intelligence. J Intell Manuf 32, 1621–1647 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01648-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01648-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation