Abstract
Companies continuously perfect product performances directing at consumers’ feedback, seeking to enhance customer satisfaction and product competitiveness. To make up for the insufficiency of previous research on product family performance improvement, a method applies multiple data-mining techniques to dig out online reviews is put forward to quantify the improvement priority of each performance in the product family, so as to guide product family improvement. Web Crawler is employed to collect customer reviews of various product variants, and then natural language processing technology is utilized to identify the words expressing functional performances and customer sentiments in the reviews, where the term frequency of each performance is defined as its importance factor. The mapping model between performance specifications and module instances in the product family is established to obtain the commonality factor of each performance. Lexicon-based machine learning is exploited to analyze customers’ sentimental values for each performance specification, which is regarded as satisfaction factor. According to the importance and satisfaction of each performance, Kano coefficient is assigned to each performance by utilizing the Kano model. Finally, combined the three factors and Kano coefficient, the improvement priority of each performance specification is estimated to suggest the enterprise to plan the resource allocation for product family improvement. The feasibility of the proposed method is demonstrated by performance improvement for sweeping robot product family and comparison with traditional questionnaire method.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef4bb/ef4bba5764517d687c7fd0a48b66eac92502853c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d20f5/d20f51fb8134ebc54eeaf74c50127ad3fdc46d14" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c6b0/8c6b0e66805a21de4aad560f5e09a9ba93253a87" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8908/c8908fa6657f90b0f198b618f6fb47c6fc7856a9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7746/a77462310a87de636875d2cc482ea2454e87ae77" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6cd5/b6cd5d8d28c9641116910bff000be8cac0f7d723" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PF:
-
Product family
- FP:
-
Functional performance
- PS:
-
Performance specification
- MI:
-
Module instance
- NLTK:
-
Natural Language Toolkit
- CR:
-
Customer requirement
- TF-IDF:
-
Term frequency-inverse document frequency
- HC:
-
Hierarchical clustering
- P :
-
Product family set
- P n :
-
The n-th type of product variant, total N types
- C :
-
The FP set of the PF
- C j :
-
The j-th kind of FP, total J kinds
- G je :
-
The e-th kind of PS of j-th FP, total E kinds of PS in j-th FP
- R n :
-
The review set of Pn
- R ni :
-
The i-th review for Pn, total I reviews for Pn
- D ni :
-
Structured data set Dni converted from review Rni
- C nij :
-
The j-th kind of FP mentioned in review Rni
- Y nij :
-
Represent whether Cj is mentioned in review Rni
- S nij :
-
Sentiment value for Cnij in review Rni
- f(C j):
-
The number of times that Cj appears in all collected reviews
- W f(C j):
-
Importance factor of the Cj
- W f(G je):
-
Importance factor of the Gje
- W c(G je):
-
Commonality factor of the Gje
- W s(G je):
-
Satisfaction factor of the Gje
- W k(G je):
-
Kano coefficient of the Gje
- B(G je):
-
Improvement priority of the Gje
- B in(G je):
-
Improvement index of the Gje
- M :
-
The module set of PF
- M d :
-
The d-th kind of module, total D kinds
- m dw :
-
The w-th kind of MI of Md, total W kinds of MI for Md
- H dw :
-
The parameter of mdw
- U(m dw):
-
The commonality of mdw
- r :
-
The mdw is configured in r types of product variants
- Z :
-
The number of MI mapped to Gje
- S je :
-
The total sentiment value Sje for each Gje
- Q :
-
Q Types of product variants configured with the Gje
- S qi j :
-
The sentiment value for Gje in i-th review of product variant q
- w f :
-
The weight of importance factor Wf(Gje)
- w c :
-
The weight of commonality factor Wc(Gje)
- w s :
-
The weight of satisfaction factor Ws(Gje)
- f k(C j):
-
The selected importance score of Cj in the k-th questionnaire, total K questionnaires collected
- S t :
-
The selected satisfaction score of Gje in the t-th questionnaire, total T questionnaires describing Gje
References
Augusto, R., Fernandes, S., da Silva, I. N., & Oleskovicz, M. (2013). Load profile identification interface for consumer online monitoring purposes in smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(3), 1507–1517. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2012.2234469
Botsaris, P. N. (2013). Guidelines for redesign a commercially available product: The case of a split air conditioning unit. In 2nd international conference on sustainable intelligent manufacturing (SIM) (pp. 373–376). Tech Univ Lisbon, Fac Architecture, Lisbon, PORTUGAL.
Chaudha, A., Jain, R., Singh, A. R., & Mishra, P. K. (2011). Integration of Kano’s Model into quality function deployment (QFD). International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 53(5–8), 689–698.
Chen, C. C., & Chuang, M. C. (2008). Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.015
Chen, D. P., Chu, X. N., Zhang, L., Feng, T., & D. EStech Publicat Inc. (2015). A redesign modules automatically selecting approach for product-service system based on the big data of online reviews and product usage data. In 2nd Asian Pacific conference on energy, environment and sustainable development (APEESD) (pp. 527–530). Paris, Peoples R China.
Chen, D., Zhang, D., & Liu, A. (2019). Intelligent Kano classification of product features based on customer reviews. CIRP Annals, 68(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.046
Chen, L., Macwan, A., & Li, S. (2007). Model-based rapid redesign using decomposition patterns. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(3), 283–294.
Dong, Y. F., Tan, R. H., Zhang, P., Peng, Q. J., & Shao, P. (2021). Product redesign using functional backtrack with digital twin. Advanced Engineering Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101361
Han, H. Y., Zhang, J. P., Yang, J., Shen, Y. R., & Zhang, Y. S. (2018). Generate domain-specific sentiment lexicon for review sentiment analysis. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(16), 21265–21280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5529-5
Han, X., Li, R., Wang, J., Ding, G. F., & Qin, S. F. (2020). A systematic literature review of product platform design under uncertainty. Journal of Engineering Design, 31(5), 266–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2019.1699036
Harland, P. E., Uddin, Z., & Laudien, S. (2020). Product platforms as a lever of competitive advantage on a company-wide level: a resource management perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0289-9
He, C., Li, Z. K., Wang, S., & Liu, D. Z. (2021). A systematic data-mining-based methodology for product family design and product configuration. Advanced Engineering Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101302
Hofstetter, W. K., & Crawley, E. F. (2013). A methodology for portfolio-level analysis of system commonality. Research in Engineering Design, 24(4), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0151-z
Hristea, F. (2002). On the semiautomatic generation of WordNet type synsets and clusters. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 8(12), 1047–1064.
Ji, P., Jin, J., Wang, T., & Chen, Y. Z. (2014). Quantification and integration of Kano’s model into QFD for optimising product design. International Journal of Production Research, 52(21), 6335–6348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.939777
Jin, J., Liu, Y., Ji, P., & Kwong, C. K. (2019). Review on recent advances in information mining from big consumer opinion data for product design. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041087
Jin, J., Liu, Y., Ji, P., & Liu, H. G. (2016). Understanding big consumer opinion data for market-driven product design. International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 3019–3041. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1154208
Jindal, N., Liu, B., & Lim, E.-P. (2010). Finding unusual review patterns using unexpected rules. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on information and knowledge management(CIKM), 1549. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kashkoush, M., & ElMaraghy, H. (2017). Designing modular product architecture for optimal overall product modularity. Journal of Engineering Design, 28(5), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2017.1307949
Kim, S., & Moon, S. K. (2017). Sustainable platform identification for product family design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.073
Li, H., Bhowmick, S. S., & Sun, A. (2010). Affinity-driven prediction and ranking of products in online product review sites. In ACM conference on information & knowledge management (pp. 1745–1748). Toronto.
Li, Z. K., Pehlken, A., Qian, H. T., & Hong, Z. X. (2016). A systematic adaptable platform architecture design methodology for early product development. Journal of Engineering Design, 27(1–3), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1112366
Lin, S. P., Yang, C. L., Chan, Y. H., & Sheu, C. (2010). Refining Kano’s “quality attributes-satisfaction” model: A moderated regression approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.03.015
Liu, D. Z., & Li, Z. K. (2021). Joint decision-making of product family configuration and order allocation by coordinating suppliers under disruption risks. Journal of Engineering Design, 32(5), 213–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2021.1877262
Liu, S. M., & Chen, J. H. (2015). A multi-label classification based approach for sentiment classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3), 1083–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.036
Marion, T. J., & Meyer, M. H. (2018). Organizing to achieve modular architecture across different products. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(3), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2018.2790839
Otto, J., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Niggemann, O. (2018). Automatic parameter estimation for reusable software components of modular and reconfigurable cyber-physical production systems in the domain of discrete manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(1), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2017.2718729
Soysal, E., Wang, J. Q., Jiang, M., Wu, Y. H., Pakhomov, S., Liu, H. F., & Xu, H. (2018). CLAMP—A toolkit for efficiently building customized clinical natural language processing pipelines. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(3), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx132
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 267–307. https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00049
Takai, S. (2019). An approach to integrate commonality and product family design with inventory decisions. Journal of Mechanical Design. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042340
Tian, G. D., Ren, Y. P., Feng, Y. X., Zhou, M. C., Zhang, H. H., & Tan, J. R. (2019). Modeling and planning for dual-objective selective disassembly using AND/OR graph and discrete artificial bee colony. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2456–2468. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2884845
Ullah, A. M. M. S., Sato, M., Watanabe, M., & Rashid, M. M. (2016). Integrating CAD, TRIZ, and customer needs. International Journal of Automation Technology, 10(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2016.p0132
Ullah, A. M. M. S., & Tamaki, J. (2011). Analysis of Kano-model-based customer needs for product development. Systems Engineering, 14(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20168
Wang, L., B. D. Y., Azarm, S., & Kannan, P. K.. (2011). Customer-driven product design selection using web based user-generated content. In ASME 2011 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (pp. 405–419). Washington.
Wang, Q., Tang, D. B., Yin, L. L., Salido, M. A., Giret, A., & Xu, Y. C. (2016). Bi-objective optimization for low-carbon product family design. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 41, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2016.02.001
Wei, W., Ji, J., Wuest, T., & Tao, F. (2017). Product family flexible design method based on dynamic requirements uncertainty analysis. In 27th CIRP design conference (pp. 332–337). Cranfield.
Wu, Y. M., Zhao, X. D., Xu, Y. X., & Chen, Y. L. (2020). A flexible planning methodology for product family assembly line based on improved NSGA_II. Assembly Automation, 40(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1108/aa-05-2019-0098
Yadav, O. P., & Goel, P. S. (2008). Customer satisfaction driven quality improvement target planning for product development in automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.12.008
Yang, Q. Y., Yu, S. R., & Jiang, D. (2014). A modular method of developing an eco-product family considering the reusability and recyclability of customer products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.030
Yin, Z. H., Li, Y. F., Fan, M., & Li, Y. (2010). Analytic hierarchy process method for evaluation and management of large-type bridges. In 2nd International conference on computer and automation engineering (ICCAE) (pp. 240–243). Singapore, Singapore.
Yuan, L. C. (2017). A new word clustering algorithm based on word similarity. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 26(6), 1221–1226.
Zhan, L. I., Kou, F. H., Cheng, X. C., & Wang, T. (2006). Model-based product redesign. International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security, 6((1(A))), 100.
Zhang, L., Chu, X. N., & Xue, D. Y. (2019). Identification of the to-be-improved product features based on online reviews for product redesign. International Journal of Production Research, 57(8), 2464–2479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1521019
Zhao, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Impacts of uncertain online reviews on pricing and profits of competitive retailers. Kybernetes, 50(2), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-05-2019-0308
Zhao, S. Y., Zhang, Q., Peng, Z. L., & Fan, Y. (2020). Integrating customer requirements into customized product configuration design based on Kano’s model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(3), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01467-y
Zhu, Z. L., Liang, J., Li, D. Y., Yu, H., & Liu, G. Q. (2019). Hot topic detection based on a refined TF-IDF algorithm. IEEE Access, 7, 26996–27007. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2893980
Acknowledgements
The financial support of this work by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 51875568), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 51475459), and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Education Institutions of China (PAPD) are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, C., Li, Z., Liu, D. et al. Improving the functional performances for product family by mining online reviews. J Intell Manuf 34, 2809–2824 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01961-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01961-w