Skip to main content
Log in

Towards Small Robot Aided Victim Manipulation

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robotic manipulation of human victims is a problem typically avoided by the robotics community primarily for fear of injuring victims further, though large robotic human transportation is more prevalent. This paper presents the issues that would need to be addressed in order to have small man-portable robots aiding the transport of incapacitated victims. Focusing on the manipulation of victims in preparation for transport, the primary design specifications are the forces that a small robot would need to be capable of applying. Data and analysis is presented for human limb manipulation, in terms of limb pose statistics and the forces required for appropriate limb motions. Descriptions of a robotic solution include a wristlet mechanism that can be robotically deployed as well as a novel head protection and cervical spine immobilization method using rapidly expanding foam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheung, Z., Delizo, M.Z.: Confined Space Guide, Cal/OSHA, California Dept. of Education (1998)

  2. Gilbert, G., Turner, T., Marchessault, R.: Army medical robotics research. Rev. Int. Serv. Santé Forces Armées 78, 105–112 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert, G.R.: Robotic Combat Casualty Extraction, Army STTR FY2010A - Topic A10a-T028 (2010)

  4. Hadley, M., Walters, B., Grabb, P., et al.: Joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery 50(3), S85–S99 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton, R., Pons, P.: The efficacy and comfort of full-body vacuum splints for cervical-spine immobilization. J. Emerg. Med. 14(5), 553–559 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hogan, D., Burstein, J.: Disaster Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2007)

  7. Howell, J., Burrow, R., Dumontier, C., Hillyard, A.: A practical radiographic comparison of short board technique and Kendrick extrication device. Ann. Emerg. Med. 18(9), 943–946 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwano, Y., Osuka, K., Amano, H.: Development of stretcher component robots for rescue activity. In: Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Rob, Autom. and Mechatronics, vol. 2, pp. 915–920 (2004)

  9. Iwano, Y., Osuka, K., Amano, H.: Experimental study of traction robot system for rescue against nuclear disaster. In: Proc. of IEEE Intl. Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics Workshop, pp. 93–98 (2005)

  10. Iwano, Y., Osuka, K., Amano, H.: Posture manipulation for rescue activity via small traction robots. In: Proc. of IEEE Intl. Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics Workshop, pp. 87–92 (2005)

  11. Iwano, Y., Osuka, K., Amano, H.: Development of stretcher component robots for rescue against nuclear disaster. J. Robotics Soc. Japan 24(3), 80 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iwano, Y., Osuka, K., Amano, H., Kikuchi, T.: On motion planning for rescue activity via small traction robots—construction and implementation of human body attitude manipulation algorithm. In: Proc. of RSJ/JSME/SICE 8th Robotics Symposia, pp. 301–306 (2003)

  13. Kwan, I., Bunn, F.: Effects of prehospital spinal immobilization: a systematic review of randomized trials on healthy subjects. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 20(1), 47–53 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Limmer, D., Okeefe, M., Grant, H., Murray, R., Bergeron, J.: Brady Emergency Care. Prentice-Hall (2001)

  15. Messina, E., Jacoff, A.: Performance standards for urban search and rescue robots. ASTM Standard. News 34(8), 27 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mondada, F., Gambardella, L., Floreano, D., Nolfi, S., Deneubourg, J., Dorigo, M.: The cooperation of swarm-bots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 12(2), 21 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy, R., Riddle, D., Rasmussen, E.: Robot-assisted medical reachback: a survey of how medical personnel expect to interact with rescue robots. In: Proc. of IEEE Intl. Workshop on Rob. Human Interactive Comm, ROMAN, pp. 301–306 (2004)

  18. Park, M., Chitta, S., Teichman, A., Yim, M.: Automatic configuration recognition methods in modular robots. Int. J. Rob. Res. 27(3–4), 403–421 (2008). doi:10.1177/0278364907089350. http://ijr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/27/3-4/403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shafer, J.S., Naunheim, R.S.: Cervical spine motion during extrication: a pilot study. West. J. Emerg. Med. 10(2), 143–150 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shah, B., Choset, H.: Survey on urban search and rescue robots. J. Robotics Soc. Japan 22(5), 40–44 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yim, M. (Rus, D. (ed.)): Planetary contingency: a competition educating graduate students in reconfigurable robotics. IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag. 15(4), 14–16 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Yim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yim, M., Laucharoen, J. Towards Small Robot Aided Victim Manipulation. J Intell Robot Syst 64, 119–139 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-010-9519-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-010-9519-3

Keywords

Navigation