Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Cross-Platform Comparison of Visual Marker Based Approaches for Autonomous Flight of Quadrocopters

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we compare three different marker based approaches for six degrees of freedom (6DOF) pose estimation, which can be used for position and attitude control of micro aerial vehicles (MAV). All methods are able to achieve real time pose estimation onboard without assistance of any external metric sensor. Since these methods can be used in various working environments, we compare their performance by carrying out experiments across two different platforms: an AscTec Hummingbird and a Pixhawk quadrocopter. We evaluate each method’s accuracy by using an external tracking system and compare the methods with respect to their operating ranges and processing time. We also compare each method’s performance during autonomous takeoff, hovering and landing of a quadrocopter. Finally we show how the methods perform in an outdoor environment. The paper is an extended version of the one with the same title published at the ICUAS Conference 2013.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cesetti, A., Frontoni, E., Mancini, A., Zingaretti, P., Longhi, S.: A vision-based guidance system for UAV navigation and safe landing using natural landmarks. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 57(1–4), 233–257 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, Q., Wu, H., Wada, T.: Camera Calibration with Two Arbitrary Coplanar Circles. ECCV-2004, LECS, vol. 3023/2004, pp. 521–532 (2004)

  3. Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 24(6), 381–395 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgibbon, A., et al.: Direct least square fitting of ellipses. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 21(5), 476–480 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. GarciaPardo, P.J., Sukhatme, G.S., Montgomery, J.F.: Towards vision-based safe landing for an autonomous helicopter. Robot. Auton. Syst. 38(1), 19–29 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grzonka, S., Grisetti, G., Burgard, W.: A fully autonomous indoor quadrotor. IEEE Trans. Robot. 28(1), 90–100 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Herisse, B., Hamel, T., Mahony, R., Russotto, F.-X.: Landing a VTOL unmanned aerial vehicle on a moving platform using optical flow. IEEE Trans. Robot. 28(1), 77–89 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanatani, K., Wu, L.: 3D interpretation of conics and orthogonality. CVGIP: Image Understanding 58, 286–301 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kneip, L., Scaramuzza, D., Siegwart, R.: A novel parametrization of the perspective-three-point problem for a direct computation of absolute camera position and orientation. In: Proc. of the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2011)

  10. Kumar, V., Michael, N.: Opportunities and challenges with autonomous micro aerial vehicles. Int. J. Robot. Res. doi: 10.1177/0278364912455954. Online 21 Aug. 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lange, S., Suenderhauf, N., Protzel, P.: A vision based onboard approach for landing and position control of an autonomous multirotor UAV in GPS-denied environments. In: Proceedings 2009 International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pp. 1–6. Munich (2009)

  12. Masselli, A., Zell, A.: A novel marker based tracking method for position and attitude control of MAVs. In: Proceedings of International Micro Air Vehicle Conference and Flight Competition (IMAV2012). Braunschweig, Germany (2012)

  13. Masselli, A., Yang, S., Wenzel, K.E., Zell, A.: A cross-platform comparison of visual marker based approaches for autonomous flight of quadrocopters. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS2013), pp. 1–9. Atlanta, GA (2013)

  14. Meier, L., Tanskanen, P., Fraundorfer, F., Pollefeys, M.: PIXHAWK: a system for autonomous flight using onboard computer vision. In: Proceedings 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2992–2997. Shanghai (2011)

  15. Mellinger, D., Michael, N., Kumar, V.: Trajectory generation and control for precise aggressive maneuvers with quadrotors. Int. J. Robot. Res. (2012). doi: 10.1177/0278364911434236

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merz, T., Duranti, S., Conte, G.: Autonomous landing of an unmanned helicopter based on vision and inertial sensing. Experimental Robotics IX 21, 343–352 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saripalli, S., Montgomery, J.F., Sukhatme, G.S.: Visually guided landing of an unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19(3), 371–380 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scherer, S.A., Dube, D., Komma, P., Masselli, A., Zell, A.: Robust real-time number sign detection on a mobile outdoor robot. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR 2011). Orebro, Sweden (2011)

  19. Wenzel, K.E., Rosset, P., Zell, A.: Low-cost visual tracking of a landing place and hovering flight control with a microcontroller. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 57(1–4), 297–311 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wenzel, K.E., Masselli, A., Zell, A.: Automatic take off, tracking and landing of a miniature UAV on a moving carrier vehicle. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 61, 221–238 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, G., Zhang, Y., Ji, S., Cheng, Y., Tian, Y.: Research on computer vision-based for UAV autonomous landing on a ship. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 30(6), 600–605 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, S., Scherer, S.A., Zell, A.: An onboard monocular vision system for autonomous takeoff, hovering and landing of a micro aerial vehicle. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. (2012). doi: 10.1007/s10846-012-97497

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science, University of Tuebingen, Sand 1, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany

    Andreas Masselli, Shaowu Yang, Karl E. Wenzel & Andreas Zell

Authors
  1. Andreas Masselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaowu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karl E. Wenzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Zell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Masselli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masselli, A., Yang, S., Wenzel, K.E. et al. A Cross-Platform Comparison of Visual Marker Based Approaches for Autonomous Flight of Quadrocopters. J Intell Robot Syst 73, 349–359 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-9925-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-9925-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation