Abstract
Consider an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operation from the time it is launched until the time it is put into an autonomous flight control mode. The control input u(t) during this time duration is modeled σ u(t) and assumed healthy with σ = 1. In practice, however, the control inputs are less effective with a σ-value in the interval [0, 1) (Fan et al. 2012; Jayakumar and Das 2006; Hu et al. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(3), 927–932, 2011). Complete damaged condition is inferred from σ = 0. Given a stabilizing controller, a range of σ-values in the interval [0,1) for which the closed loop system would remain stable is referred as the fault-tolerant margin (FTM). Flight operations with control effectiveness beyond the FTM are catastrophic. Further, when aerodynamic parameter variations due to an uncertain atmospheric condition in an UAV are present, it is shown that the FTMs are extremely sensitive to these parameter perturbations. In this paper, the FTMs are presented. The effects of control effectiveness factor on the nonlinear UAV when it is in the stable range are investigated. An UAV model in Ashokkumar and York (2016) is considered to illustrate the FTMs as a threshold to guarantee the safe operation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fan, J., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Z.: Hybrid Fault Tolerant Flight Control against Actuator Faults and Input Saturation: a Set Invariant Approach. In: The Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Minneapolis, AIAA, 2012-4537 (2012)
Jayakumar, M., Das, B.B.: Detection and Isolation of Incipient Sensor Faults in a Flight Control Actuator. In: 6th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), Wichita, AIAA, 2006-7791 (2006)
Hu, Q., Xiao, B., Zhang, Y.: Fault tolerant attitude control for spacecraft under loss of actuator effectiveness. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(3), 927–932 (2011)
Oaks, Jr. O.J., Cook, G.: Piecewise linear control of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. Control. Instrum. IECI-23, 56–63 (1976)
Stevens, B.L., Lewis, F.L.: Aircraft Control and Simulation. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1992). Chapters 1 and 2
Khalil, H.K.: Nonlinear Systems, Second Edition, p 127. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1996). ch. 3.3
Chang, B.C., Kwatny, H.G., Thomas, S., Bajpai, G., Hu, D.C., Belcastro, C.: Reconfigurable control of aircraft in nonlinear flight regimes, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, San Francisco, AIAA-2005-6167 (2005)
Thomas, S., Bajpai, G., Kwatny, H.G., Chang, B.C.: Nonlinear dynamic stability and bifurcation in aircraft: Simulation and analysis tools, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, San Francisco, AIAA-2005-6428 (2005)
Feron, E.: A more reliable robust stability indicator for linear systems subject to parametric uncertainties. IEEE Trans. on Autom. Control 42, 1326–1330 (1997)
Bianchini, G., Falugi, P., Tesi, A., Vicino, A.: A convex lower bound for the real l 2parametric stability margin of linear control systems with restricted complexity controllers. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 52, 514–520 (2007)
Rachinayani, P.: Robust Fault Tolerant Control for Aircraft Systems, M.S. Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Louisiana State University, USA
Shore, D., Bodson, M.: Flight testing of a reconfigurable system on an unmanned aircraft. In: 2004 American Control Conference, Boston, 3747–3752 USA (2004)
Richter, J.H., Heemels, W.P.M.H., van de Wouw, N., Lunze, J.: Reconfigurable control of piecewise affine systems with actuator and sensor faults: stability and tracking. Automatica 47, 678–691 (2011)
Tandale, M.D., Valasek, J.: Fault Tolerant structured adaptive model inversion control. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 29, 635–642 (2006)
Chowdhary, G., Johnson, E.N., Chandramohan, R., Kimbrell, M.S., Calise, A.J.: Guidance and control of airplanes under actuator failures and severe structural damage. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 36, 1093–1104 (2013)
Choi, J.W., Lee, S.B., Lee, D.Y., Park, U.S., Suh, Y.S.: A fault isolation filter design using left eigenstructure assignment scheme. KSME Int. J. 14, 583–589 (2000)
Zhang, Y., Jiang, J., Theilliol, D.: Incorporating performance degradation in fault tolerant control system design with multiple actuator failures. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 6, 327–338 (2008)
Qi, R., Zhu, L., Jiang, B.: Fault Tolerant reconfigurable control for MIMO systems using online fuzzy identification. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 9, 3915–3928 (2013)
Zhang, Y., Rabbath, C.A., Su, C.Y.: Reconfigurable control allocation applied to an aircraft benchmark model, American Control Conference Seattle, 1052–1057 (2008)
Cotting, M.C., Burken, J.J.: reconfigurable control design for the full X-33 Flight Envelope. NASA-TM-2001-210396 (2001)
Wang, Q., Stengal, R.F.: Robust nonlinear flight control of a high performance aircraft. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 13, 15–26 (2005)
Sundarapandian, V.: New Results on the parametric stability of nonlinear systems. Math. Compu. Model. 43, 9–15 (2006)
Ferrari, S., Stengal, R.F.: Online Adaptive critical flight control. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 27, 777–786 (2004)
Zhang, Y., Jiang, J.: Bibliographical review on reconfigurable fault-tolerant control systems. Annu. Rev. Control. 32, 229–252 (2008)
Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R., Yen, K., Kavuri, S.N.: A Review of process fault detection and diagnosis Part I: Quantitative model-based methods. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27, 293–311 (2003)
Marzat, J., Lahanier, H.P., Damongeot, F., Walter, E.: Model based fault diagnosis for aerospace systems: a survey. Proc. IMechE G J. Aerosp. Eng. 226, 510–531 (2012)
Marzat, J., Lahanier, H.P., Damongeot, F., Walter, E.: Control based fault detection and isolation for autonomous aircraft. Proc. IMechE G J. Aerosp. Eng. 226, 1329–1360 (2012)
Steinberg, M.: Historical overview of research in reconfigurable flight control. Proc. IMechE G J. Aerosp. Eng. 215, 263–275 (2005)
Barmish, R.B., Fu, M., Saleh, S.: Stability of polytope of matrices: counterexamples. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 33, 569–572 (1988)
Barmish, B.R: New Tools for Robustness of Linear Systems, Macmillan Publishing Company (1994)
Bhattacharyya, S.P., Chapllat, H., Keel, L.H.: Robust Control: The Parametric Approach. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey (1995)
Mueller, A. (ed.): Recent Advances in Robust Control –Theory and Applications in Robotics and Electromechanics, In Tech (2011)
Feron, E.: A more reliable robust stability indicator for linear systems subject to parametric uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 42, 13261330 (1997)
Fu, M., Dasgupta, S.: Robust stability under a class of nonlinear parametric perturbations. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 40, 213–223 (1995)
Fu, M., Polis, M.P.: Introduction to the parametric approach to robust stability. EEE Control. Syst. Mag. 33, 7–11 (1989)
Bianchini, G., Falugi, P., Tesi, A., Vicino, A.: A convex lower bound for the real l2 parametric stability margin of linear control systems with restricted complexity controllers. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 52, 514–520 (2007)
Ashokkumar, C.R., York, G.: Aircraft Navigation with Uncertain Aerodynamics. In: The Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, San Diego, AIAA-2016-1291 (2016)
Yedavalli, R.K.: Flight control applications of new stability robustness bounds for linear uncertain systems. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 16, 1032–1037 (1993)
Tesi, Vicino, A.: Robust stability of state space models with structured uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 35, 191–194 (1990)
Marwaha, M., Valasek, J.: Fault tolerant control allocation for Mars entry vehicle using adaptive control. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 25(2), 95–113 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashokkumar, C.R., York, G.W. & Gruber, S.F. Fault Tolerant Margins for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Safety. J Intell Robot Syst 88, 481–494 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0487-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0487-8