Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenges and Safety Aspects of a Disaster Relief Exercise

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) spread rapidly in the last years, both for civil and military applications. The performance of Dangerous, Dull and Dirty missions implies a wide use of the sUAS, in particular to manage hazardous events, such as natural or man-made major incidents or mass casualty situations. The management and control of an emergency are crucial aspects for the rescue teams and training activities- through joined exercises- are basic for the development of coordination capabilities. The aim of this paper is to report an example of a joined exercise between Italian civil and military authorities performed in Moncalieri city (Torino, Italy) on May 2015. The main procedures and challenges of the civil and military protection services are analyzed. The exercise was performed in a critical scenario where the safety of the operators and population on the ground had to be taken into account. Therefore, international and national regulations are analyzed in the paper, in particular in terms of safety requirements and kinetic energy threshold at the impact. The paper deals with all aspects concerning the human health, from the safety during the small UAS operations to the medical applications. Rather than a specific scientific aspect related to sUAS, a specific application is reported. Due to the critic scenario, an example of risk analysis is achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yearbook (2015). Retrieved from http://uvs-international.org/index.php/component/content/category/253-yearbook

  2. Amukele, T.K., Sokoll, L.J., Pepper, D., Howard, D.P., Street, J.: Can unmanned aerial systems (Drones) be used for the routine transport of chemistry, hematology, and coagulation laboratory specimens? pp. 1–15. Journal Plos One, Denmark (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO: Telemedicine- Opportunities and developments in Member States, Reports on the second global survey on eHealth, Volume 2, (2010)

  4. WHO: Mass Casualty Management Systems- Strategies and guidelines for building health sector capacity, WHO Document Production Services, Geneva, Switzerland, (2007)

  5. Standing Operating Procedures for the Euro-Atlantic Disaster Response Unit (EADRU). Retrieved April 16, 2007 from http://www.nato.int/eadrcc/sop/sop.htm

  6. Guidelines on the Use of Foreign Military and Civil Defence Assets in Disaster Relief – ”Oslo Guidelines” (2007). Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.unocha.org/

  7. Panichini, J.P.: Manual on Policies and Procedures Concerning the Reimbursement and Control of Contingent-Owned Equipment of Troop/Police Contributors Participating in Peacekeeping Missions (COE Manual), United Nations- General Assembly, Sixty-sixth session, Fifth Committee Agenda, item 146, Working Group on Contingent-Owned Equipment (2011)

  8. Training module on planning for disaster preparedness and mitigation (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/ad346e/ad346e0d.htm

  9. Mileti, D.: Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.M.E. (Stato Maggiore dell’Esercito), Direttiva sui concorsi militari in tempo di pace, www.forzearmate.org (2015)

  11. AJP-01(D) Allied Joint Publication (2010)

  12. European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety (2001)

  13. EASA, Policy Statement: Airworthiness Certification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) (2009)

  14. EASA: Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC (2008)

  15. EASA: Advance Notice of Proposed Amendment 2015-10 (2015)

  16. Riga Declaration on Remotely Piloted Aircraft (drones) Framing the future of aviation, Riga (2015)

  17. Support civil drones market development by signing the Riga Declaration (2015). Retrieved March 6, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/news/doc/2015-03-06-drones/2015-03-06-riga-declaration-drones

  18. EASA, Prototype Commission Regulation on Unmanned Aircraft Operations (2016)

  19. EASA, Prototype Commission Regulation on Unmanned Aircraft Operations- Explanatory Note (2016)

  20. ENAC, Remotely Piloted Aerial Vehicles Regulation, Italy (2015)

  21. ENAC, Aeromoboli a Pilotaggio Remoto con caratteristiche di inoffensivitá, Italy (2016)

  22. Weibel, R.E., Hansman, J.R.: Safety Considerations for Operations of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the National Airspace System, MIT International Center for Air Transportation, Report No. ICAT 2005-1 (2005)

  23. Gonzalez, D.L., Constable, R., Dayton, T., Widder, J., Klauenberg, B.J.: 66 mm Non-Lethal Grenade: Human Eects Review, United States Air Force Research Laboratory (2003)

  24. Lyon, D.H., Bir, C.A., Patton, B.J.: Injury evaluation techniques for non-lethal kinetic energy munitions, ARL-TR-1868, Army Research Laboratory, USA Department of Defence (1999)

  25. FAA, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Registration Task Force (RTF) Aviation Rulemaking COmmitee (ARC), TAsk Force Recommendations- Final Report (2015)

  26. NATO, Manual on NATO Safety Principles for the Storage of ammunition and explosives, AC/258 - D/258 (1976)

  27. Dalamagkidis, K., Valavanis, K.P., Piegl, L.A.: On integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system, 2nd edn. Springer, (2010)

  28. Rohne, H. Schiesslehre fur Infanterie (1906)

  29. Sterne, T.E., Dziemian, A.J.: Provisional probabilities of incapacitation by a caliber 0.30 Rie-Bullet, Ball M-2, BRLM 949. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Proving Ground, MD (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Henderson, J.: Lethality criteria for debris generated from accidental explosions, ADM002313. 34th Department of Defence Explosives Safety Board Seminar, Portland, Oregon (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Albris SenseFly. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.sensefly.com/drones/albris.html

  32. 4. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-4

  33. JAA/EUROCONTROL, A concept for European regulations for civil unmanned aerial vehicles, Appendix 3.5 (2004)

  34. Guglieri, G., Quagliotti, F., Ristorto, G.: Operational Issues and Assessment of Risk for Light UAVs, Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, Canadian Science Publishing (NRC Research Press), pp. 119–129, ISSN:22913467 (2014)

  35. FAA: Expected casualty calculations for commercial space launch and reentry missions. FAA-AC431.35 (2000)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Novaro Mascarello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novaro Mascarello, L., Quagliotti, F. Challenges and Safety Aspects of a Disaster Relief Exercise. J Intell Robot Syst 88, 737–749 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0518-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0518-5

Keywords

Navigation