Abstract
A cooperative aircraft differential game where an Attacker missile pursues an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) herein called the Target is addressed. The Target UAV cooperates with up to two Defender missiles which are launched in order to intercept the Attacker before the latter reaches the Target. This is a scenario with important military applications where each one of the agents is an autonomous air vehicle. Each agent plans and corrects its course of action in order to defeat an opposing force while simultaneously optimizing an operational relevant cost/payoff performance measure. The Target and the Defenders cooperate to form a team against the Attacker. The results in this paper build on the solution of a three agent differential game, where the three players are the Target, the Attacker, and one Defender; in this paper, the benefits of firing a second Defender are considered. Indeed, launching two interceptor missiles is a standard procedure by providing redundant backup. Building on the solution of the one-Defender problem, it is possible to address a seemingly intractable problem, where the Target needs to decide which Defender(s) to cooperate with, in addition to obtaining the optimal headings of every player in the game. Given the initial positions of the players, we solve the problem of determining if a second Defender improves the Target/Defender(s) payoff and provide the optimal strategies for each of the agents involved. Finally, we address the game of kind (for the case of one Defender) which provides the safety regions to determine which side will win based on the initial state. These safety regions provides the Target’s area of vulnerability, and using these results, we describe the reduction to the Target’s vulnerability area brought by an additional Defender.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bakolas, E., Tsiotras, P.: Optimal pursuit of moving targets using dynamic Voronoi diagrams 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 7431–7436 (2010)
Basar, T., Olsder, G.J.: Dynamic noncooperative game theory Classics in Applied Mathemetics, vol. 23. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) (1999)
Casbeer, D.W., Garcia, E., Pachter, M.: The target differential game with two defenders International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (2016)
Earl, M.G., D’Andrea, R.: A decomposition approach to multi-vehicle cooperative control. Robot. Auton. Syst. 55(4), 276–291 (2007)
Fuchs, Z.E., Khargonekar, P.P., Evers, J.: Cooperative defense within a single-pursuer, two-evader pursuit evasion differential game 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 3091–3097 (2010)
Ganebny, S.A., Kumkov, S.S., Le Ménec, S., Patsko, V.S.: Model problem in a line with two pursuers and one evader. Dyn. Games Appl. 2(2), 228–257 (2012)
Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Fuchs, Z.E., Pachter, M.: Aircraft defense differential game with non-zero capture radius 20th IFAC World Congress (2017)
Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pachter, M.: Active target defense differential game with fast defender American Control Conference, pp 3752–3757 (2015)
Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pachter, M.: Cooperative strategies for optimal aircraft defense from an attacking missile. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 38(8), 1510–1520 (2015)
Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pachter, M.: Escape regions of the active target defense differential game ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference (2015)
Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pham, K., Pachter, M.: Cooperative aircraft defense from an attacking missile 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 2926–2931 (2014)
Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pham, K., Pachter, M.: Cooperative aircraft defense from an attacking missile using proportional navigation AIAA Guidence, Navigation, and Control Conference (2015)
Huang, H., Zhang, W., Ding, J., Stipanovic, D.M., Tomlin, C.J.: Guaranteed decentralized pursuit-evasion in the plane with multiple pursuers 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, pp 4835–4840 (2011)
Isaacs, R.: Differential Games. Wiley, New York (1965)
Pachter, M., Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W.: Active target defense differential game 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, pp 46–53 (2014)
Perelman, A., Shima, T., Rusnak, I.: Cooperative differential games strategies for active aircraft protection from a homing missile. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(3), 761–773 (2011)
Pham, K.: Risk-averse based paradigms for uncertainty forecast and management in differential games of persistent disruptions and denials American Control Conference, pp 842–849 (2010)
Prokopov, O., Shima, T.: Linear quadratic optimal cooperative strategies for active aircraft protection. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 36(3), 753–764 (2013)
Ratnoo, A., Shima, T.: Line-of-sight interceptor guidance for defending an aircraft. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(2), 522–532 (2011)
Ratnoo, A., Shima, T.: Guidance strategies against defended aerial targets. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 35(4), 1059–1068 (2012)
Rubinsky, S., Gutman, S.: Three body guaranteed pursuit and evasion AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp 1–24 (2012)
Rubinsky, S., Gutman, S.: Three-player pursuit and evasion conflict. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 37 (1), 98–110 (2014)
Rusnak, I.: The lady, the bandits, and the bodyguards–a two team dynamic game 16th IFAC World Congress, pp. 441–446 (2005)
Rusnak, I., Weiss, H., Hexner, G.: Guidance laws in target-missile-defender scenario with an aggressive defender 18th IFAC World Congress, pp 9349–9354 (2011)
Scott, W., Leonard, N.E.: Pursuit, herding and evasion: a three-agent model of caribou predation American Control Conference, pp 2978–2983 (2013)
Shaferman, V., Shima, T.: Cooperative multiple-model adaptive guidance for an aircraft defending missile. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 33(6), 1801–1813 (2010)
Shima, T.: Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(2), 414–425 (2011)
Yamasaki, T., Balakrishnan, S.N.: Triangle intercept guidance for aerial defense AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2010)
Yamasaki, T., Balakrishnan, S.N., Takano, H.: Modified command to line-of-sight intercept guidance for aircraft defense. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 36(3), 898–902 (2013)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Prof. Tamer Basar for the fruitful conversations leading to this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casbeer, D.W., Garcia, E. & Pachter, M. The Target Differential Game with Two Defenders. J Intell Robot Syst 89, 87–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0563-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0563-0