Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical and Experimental Investigations on the Effect of Overlap and Offset on the Design of a Novel Quadrotor Configuration, VOOPS

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theoretical and experimental investigations of a novel configuration for a Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL) quadrotor system with a Vertically Offset Overlapped Propulsion System (VOOPS) is presented in this paper. The objective of the VOOPS concept is to improve the load carrying capability of the VTOL system without any increase in the footprint or reduction in endurance. This has been accomplished by overlapping the propeller blades with a vertical offset such that they don’t intersect. This way VOOPS can accommodate a larger propeller size without increase in footprint. The aerodynamics of the overlap and offset on the quadrotor performance has been analyzed using Blade Element and Momentum Theory (BEMT) and a methodology has been proposed to find their effects on thrust, drag, and power. The important design constraints for VOOPS are offset and overlap of the propellers, whose limits are evaluated using the blade-bending profile and the geometry of the propeller, respectively. The mathematical model and the design of a VOOPS quadrotor system is also presented. A quadrotor with VOOPS configuration has been designed and experimental studies have shown that the theoretical results obtained are in good agreement with the experiments. The practical implementation of VOOPS configuration and the consequences of the design changes are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gavrilets, V., Martinos, I., Mettler, B., Feron, E.: Control logic for automated aerobatic flight of a miniature helicopter. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit (2002)

  2. Bouabdallah, S., Murrieri, P., Siegwart, R.: Design and control of an indoor micro quadrotor. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2004)

  3. Pines, D.J., Bohorquez, F.: Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development. J. Aircr. 43, 290–305 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bibik, P., Narkiewicz, J., Zasuwa, M., Zugaj, M.: Quadrotor dynamics and control of precise handling. Studies Syst. Decision Control Innov. Simul. Syst. 33, 335–351 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goslinski, J., Gardecki, S., Giernacki, W.: An efficient pso-based method for an identification of a quadrotor model parameters, progress in automation, robotics and measuring techniques. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 351, 95–104 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabrlik, P., Kriz, V., Vomocil, J., Zalud, L: The design and implementation of quadrotor UAV, emergent trends in robotics and intelligent systems. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 316, 47–56 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, T.S., Karl, S., Kecman, V.: Control of 3 DOF quadrotor model. Lecture Notes Control Inf. Sci. Robot Motion Control 360, 29–38 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Szlchetko, B., Lower, M.: On quadrotor navigation using fuzzy logic regulators. Comput. Collect. Intell. Technol. Appl. 7653, 210–219 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nonami, K., Kendoul, F., Suzuki, S., Wang, W., Nakazawa, D.: Autonomous control of a mini quadrotor vehicle using LQG controllers. Autonomous Flying Robots 1, 61–76 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yakovlev, K., Khithov, V., Loginov, M., Petrov, A.: Distributed control and navigation system for quadrotor UAVs in GPS-denied environments. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 323, 49–56 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sadeghzadeh, I., Abdolhosseini, M., Zhang, Y.M.: Payload drop applications of unmanned quadrotor helicopter using gain-scheduled PID and model predictive control techniques. Intelligent Robots Appl. 7506, 386–395 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Powers, C., Mellinger, D., Kushleyev, A., Kothmann, B., Kumar, V.: Influence of aerodynamics and proximity effects in quadrotor flight. Exp. Robot. 88, 289–302 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yan, H., Li, H., Song, S.: Study on dynamic balance PID control algorithm and its application on the quadrotor. In: International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Automatic Control, vol. 367, pp 1071–1078 (2016)

  14. Bibik, P., Narkiewicz, J., Zasuwa, M., Zugaj, M.: Quadrotor dynamics and control for precise handling. Stud. Syst. Decision Control Innov. Simul. Syst. 33, 335–351 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Powers, C., Mellinger, D., Kumar, V.: Quadrotor kinematics and dynamics. In: Valavanis, K., Vachtsevanos, G J. (eds.) Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, pp 307–328. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aydemir, M., Arikan, K.B., İrfanoğlu, B.: Disturbance rejection control of a quadrotor equipped with a 2 DOF manipulator. In: Billingsley J., Brett P. (eds.) Machine Vision and Mechatronics in Practice, pp 91–103. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michini, B., Redding, J., Ure, N.K., Cutler, M., How, J.P.: Design and flight testing of an autonomous variable-pitch quadrotor. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2011)

  18. Efraim, H., Shapiro, A., Weiss, G.: Quadrotor with a dihedral angle: on the effects of tilting the rotors inwards. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 80, 313–324 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Verbeke, J., Hulens, D., Ramon, H., Goedemé, T., Schutter, J.D.: The design and construction of a high endurance hexacopter suited for narrow corridors*. In: International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) (2014)

  20. Driessens, S., Pounds, P: The triangular quadrotor: a more efficient quadrotor configuration. IEEE Trans. Robot. 31, 1517–1525 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bouabdallah, S., Bermes, C., Grzonka, S., Gimkiewicz, C., Brenzikofer, A., Hahn, R., Schafroth, D.: Towards palm-size autonomous helicopters. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 61, 445–71 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Driessens, S., Pounds, P.E.I.: Towards a more efficient quadrotor configuration. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1386–92. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696530

  23. Pounds, P., Mahony, R., Gresham, J.: Towards dynamically-favourable quad-rotor aerial robots. In: Australian Conference on Robotics and Automation (2004)

  24. Idea Forge, http://www.ideaforge.co.in/ (2016)

  25. Abdilla, A., Richards, A., Burrow, S.: Endurance optimisation of battery-powered rotorcraft. In: Dixon, C., Tuyls, K. (eds.) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9287. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nandakumar, G., Ranganathan, T., Arjun, B.J., Thondiyath, A.: Design and analysis of a novel quadrotor system – VOOPS. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2015)

  27. Apostolo, G.: The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Helicopters. Bonanza Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leishman, G.J.: Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, W.: Helicopter theory. Dover Publications, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stepniewski, W.Z., Keys, C.N.: Rotary-Wing. Dover Publications, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Megson, T.: Introduction to Aircraft Structural Analysis. Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fossen, T.I.: Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles. Wiley, Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Murray, R.M.M., Shastry, S., Li, Z., Sastry, S.S.: A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoffmann, G., Huang, H., Waslander, S., Tomlin, C.: Quadrotor helicopter flight dynamics and control: theory and experiment. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit (2007)

  35. Craig, J.J.: Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, United States (2005)

  36. Ziegler, J.G., Nichols, N.B.: Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control. 115, 220–22 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India

    Ganeshram Nandakumar & Asokan Thondiyath

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli, 620015, India

    Arjun Srinivasan

Authors
  1. Ganeshram Nandakumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arjun Srinivasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asokan Thondiyath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganeshram Nandakumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nandakumar, G., Srinivasan, A. & Thondiyath, A. Theoretical and Experimental Investigations on the Effect of Overlap and Offset on the Design of a Novel Quadrotor Configuration, VOOPS. J Intell Robot Syst 92, 615–628 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0707-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0707-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation