Abstract
We consider the design of approximation algorithms for a number of maximum graph partitioning problems, among others MAX-k-CUT, MAX-k-DENSE-SUBGRAPH, and MAX-k-DIRECTED-UNCUT. We present a new version of the semidefnite relaxation scheme along with a better analysis, extending work of Halperin and Zwick (2002). This leads to an improvement over known approximation factors for such problems. The key to the improvement is the following new technique: It was already observed by Han et al. (2002) that a parameter-driven choice of the random hyperplane can lead to better approximation factors than obtained by Goemans and Williamson (1995). But it remained difficult to find a “good” set of parameters. In this paper, we analyze random hyperplanes depending on several new parameters. We prove that a sub-optimal choice of these parameters can be obtained by the solution of a linear program which leads to the desired improvement of the approximation factors. In this fashion a more systematic analysis of the semidefinite relaxation scheme is obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Ageev, R. Hassin, and M. Sviridenko, “A 0.5-approximation algorithm for MAX DICUT with given sizes of parts,” SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 246–255, 2001.
A. Ageev and M. Sviridenko, “Approximation algorithms for maximum coverage and max cut with given size of parts,” in Proceedings of Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, 1999, pp. 17–30.
Y. Asahiro, K. Iwama, H. Tamaki, and T. Tokuyama, “Greedily finding a dense subgraph,” Journal of Algorithms, vol. 34, pp. 203–221, 2000.
D. Bertsimas and Y. Ye, Semidefinite Relaxations, Multivariate Normal Distributions, and Order Statistics, Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization, vol. 3, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998, pp. 1–19.
A. Frieze and M. Jerrum, “Improved approximation algorithms for MAX k-CUT and MAX Bisection,” Algorithmica, vol. 18, pp. 67–81, 1997.
U. Feige and M. Langberg, “Approximation algorithms for maximization problems arising in graph partitioning,” Journal of Algorithms, vol. 41, pp. 174–211, 2001.
U. Feige and M. Langberg, “The RPR2 rounding technique for semidefinite programs,” in Proceedings of the 33th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Crete, Greece, 2001, pp. 213–224.
U. Feige, G. Kortsarz, and D. Peleg, “The dense k-subgraph problem,” Algorithmica, vol. 29, pp. 410–421, 2001.
U. Feige and M. Seltser, “On the densest k-subgraph problem,” Technical report, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, September 1997.
M.X. Goemans and D.P. Williamson, “Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming,” Journal of the ACM, vol. 42, pp. 1115–1145, 1995.
E. Halperin and U. Zwick, “A unified framework for obtaining improved approximation algorithms for maximum graph bisection problems,” Random Structures and Algorithms, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 382–402, 2002.
Q. Han, Y. Ye, and J. Zhang, “An improved rounding method and semidefinite programming relaxation for graph partition,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 509–535, 2002.
A. Srivastav and K. Wolf, “Finding dense subgraphs with semidefinite programming,” in Proceedings of Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization, 1998, pp, 181–191.
A. Srivastav and K. Wolf, “Finding dense subgraphs with semidefinite programming,” Erratum, Mathematisches Seminar, Universität zu Kiel, 1999.
P. Turán, “On an extremal problem in graph theory,” Mat. Fiz. Lapok, vol. 48, pp. 436–452, 1941.
Y. Ye, “A. 699-approximation algorithm for MAX-Bisection,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2001.
Y. Ye and J. Zhang, “Approximation of dense-n/2-subgraph and the complement of Min-Bisection,” Unpublished Manuscript, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jäger, G., Srivastav, A. Improved Approximation Algorithms for Maximum Graph Partitioning Problems. J Comb Optim 10, 133–167 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-005-2269-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-005-2269-7