Abstract
We study minimum-cost sensor placement on a bounded 3D sensing field, R, which comprises a number of discrete points that may or may not be grid points. Suppose we have ℓ types of sensors available with different sensing ranges and different costs. We want to find, given an integer σ ≥ 1, a selection of sensors and a subset of points to place these sensors such that every point in R is covered by at least σ sensors and the total cost of the sensors is minimum. This problem is known to be NP-hard. Let k i denote the maximum number of points that can be covered by a sensor of the ith type. We present in this paper a polynomial-time approximation algorithm for this problem with a proven approximation ratio \({\gamma = \sum_{i=1}^{\ell} k_{i} -\sigma+1}\). In applications where the distance of any two points has a fixed positive lower bound, each k i is a constant, and so we have a polynomial-time approximation algorithms with a constant guarantee. While γ may be large, we note that it is only a worst-case upper bound. In practice the actual approximation ratio is small, even on randomly generated points that do not have a fixed positive minimum distance between them. We provide a number of numerical results for comparing approximation solutions and optimal solutions, and show that the actual approximation ratios in these examples are all less than 3, even though γ is substantially larger.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkelaar M, Notebaert P, Eikland K (2005) LP Solve: Linear programming code, version 5.5. Eindhoven Univ. of Technology, The Netherlands
Cardei M, Du DZ (2005) Improving wireless sensor network lifetime through power aware organization. ACM Wireless Networks 11(3):333–340
Cardei M, MacCallum D, Cheng X, Min M, Jia X, Li D, Du DZ (2002) Wireless sensor networks with energy efficient organization. J Interconnection Networks 3(3–4):213–229
Chakrabarty K, Iyengar SS, Qi H, Cho E (2002) Grid coverage for surveillance and target location in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Trans on Comput 51(12):1448–1453
Clouqueur T, Phipatanasuphorn V, Ramanathan P, Saluja KK (2002) Sensor deployment strategy for target detection. In: Proc of 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, pp 42–48
Culler D (2005) Sensor networks—The next tier of the internet. Keynote speeach in the Workshop on Sensor Networks—What Is Real and What Lies Ahead, Boston University
Gage D (1992) Command control for many-robot systems. In: Proc of the 9th AUVS Technical Symposium, 1992. Reprinted in Unmanned Systems Magazine 10(4):28–34
Gui C, Mohapatra P (2004) Power conservation and quality of surveillance in target tracking sensor networks. In: Proc of the 10th ACM Mobicom, pp 129–143
Hsin CF, Liu M (2004) Network coverage using low duty-cycled sensors: random and coordinated sleep algorithms. In: Proc of the 3rd Intl Symposium on Information Processing In Sensor Networks, pp 433–442
Kar K, Banerjee S (2003) Node placement for connected coverage in sensor networks. In: Proc WiOpt 2003: Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks
Liu B, Towsley D (2004) A study on the coverage of large-scale sensor networks. In: Proc of the 1st IEEE Intl Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems, pp 475–483
Meguerdichian S, Koushanfar F, Potkonjak M, Srivastava MB (2001) Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In: Proc IEEE Infocom, pp 1380–1387
Meguerdichian S, Koushanfar F, Qu G, Potkonjak M (2001) Exposure in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In: Proc of the 7th Intl Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp 139–150
Sahni S, Xu X (2005) Algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Int J on Distrib Sensor Networks 1(1):35–56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NSF under grant CCF-04080261 and by NSF of China under grant 60273062.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Zhong, N. Efficient point coverage in wireless sensor networks. J Comb Optim 11, 291–304 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-006-7909-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-006-7909-z