Skip to main content
Log in

Robust optimization for the hazardous materials transportation network design problem

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we reconsider the hazardous materials transportation network design problem with uncertain edge risk (HTNDPUR) which is proved as strong NP-hard. The natural ways to handle NP-hard problems are approximation solutions or FPT algorithms. We prove that the HTNDPUR does not admit any approximation, neither any FPT algorithm, unless P = NP. Furthermore, we utilize the minimax regret criterion to model the HTNDPUR as a bi-level integer programming formulation under edge risk uncertainty, where an interval of possible risk values is associated with each arc. We present a robust heuristic approach that always finds a robust and stable hazmat transportation network. At the end, we test our method on a network of Guangdong province in China to illustrate the efficiency of the algorithm. Our experimental results illustrate that the robust interval risk scenario network performs better than the deterministic scenario network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. China Chemical Safety Association. http://www.chemicalsafety.org.cn

  2. Kara BY, Verter V (2004) Designing a road network for hazardous materials transportation. Transp Sci 38(2):188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erkut E, Alp O (2007) Designing a road network for hazardous materials shipments. Comput Oper Res 34(5):1389–1405

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Erkut E, Gzara F (2008) Solving the hazmat transport network design problem. Comput Oper Res 35(7):2234–2247

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Verter V, Kara BY (2008) A path-based approach for hazmat transport network design. Manag Sci 54(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amaldi E, Bruglieri M, Fortz B (2011) On the hazmat transport network design problem. Lect Notes Comput Sci 6701:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bianco L, Caramia M, Giordani S (2009) A bilevel flow model for hazmat transportation netwokrk design. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 17(2):175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Erkut E, Verter V (1998) Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Oper Res 46(5):625–642

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Erkut E, Tjandra SA, Verter V (2007) Hazardous materials transportation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu BH (2009) Approximability and fixed-parameter tractability for the exemplar genomic distance problems. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5532:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soyster A (1973) Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res 21:1154–1157

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski AS (2009) Robust optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertsimas D, Sim M (2003) Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math Program Ser B 98(1–3):49–71

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52(1):35–53

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Karasan OE, Pinar MC, Yaman H (2001) The robust shortest path problem with interval data[R]. Technical report, Bilkent University

  16. Kouvelis P, Yu G (1997) Robust discrete optimization and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabrel V, Murat C (2007) Robust shortest path problems. Ann du LAMSADE 7:71–93

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zielinski P (2004) The computational complexity of the relative robust shortest path problem with interval data. Eur J Oper Res 158:570–576

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Averbakh I, Lebedev V (2004) Interval data minmax regret network optimizationproblems. Discret Appl Math 138:289–301

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wen U, Hsu S (1991) Linear bi-Level programming problems - a review. J Oper Res Soc 42(2):125–133

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2007) An overview of bilevel optimization. Ann Oper Res 153(1):235–256

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Montemanni R, Gambardella LM (2004) An exact algorithm for the robust shortest path problem with interval data. Comput Oper Res 31:1667–1680

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Montemanni R, Gambardella LM (2005) The robust path problem with interval data via benders decomposition. Q J Oper Res 3(4):315–328

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Montemanni R, Gambardella LM, Donati AV (2004) A branch and bound algorithm for the robust shortest path problem with interval data. Oper Res Lett 32:225–232

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (70971008), the Ministry of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Project (09YJC630008). We would like to thank the referees and Associate Editor for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunlin Xin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xin, C., Qingge, L., Wang, J. et al. Robust optimization for the hazardous materials transportation network design problem. J Comb Optim 30, 320–334 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-014-9751-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-014-9751-z

Keywords

Navigation