Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bounds on the domination number of a digraph

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A vertex subset S of a digraph D is called a dominating set of D if every vertex not in S is adjacent from at least one vertex in S. The domination number of D, denoted by \(\gamma (D)\), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of D. The Slater number \(s\ell (D)\) is the smallest integer t such that t added to the sum of the first t terms of the non-increasing out-degree sequence of D is at least as large as the order of D. For any digraph D of order n with maximum out-degree \(\Delta ^+\), it is known that \(\gamma (D)\ge \lceil n/(\Delta ^++1)\rceil \). We show that \(\gamma (D)\ge s\ell (D)\ge \lceil n/(\Delta ^++1)\rceil \) and the difference between \(s\ell (D)\) and \(\lceil n/(\Delta ^++1)\rceil \) can be arbitrarily large. In particular, for an oriented tree T of order n with \(n_0\) vertices of out-degree 0, we show that \((n-n_0+1)/2\le s\ell (T)\le \gamma (T)\le 2s\ell (T)-1\) and moreover, each value between the lower bound \(s\ell (T)\) and the upper bound \(2s\ell (T)-1\) is attainable by \(\gamma (T)\) for some oriented trees. Further, we characterize the oriented trees T for which \(s\ell (T)=(n-n_0+1)/2\) hold and show that the difference between \(s\ell (T)\) and \((n-n_0+1)/2\) can be arbitrarily large. Some other elementary properties involving the Slater number are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahangar HA, Henning MA, Löwenstein C, Zhao Y, Samodivkin V (2014) Signed Roman domination in graphs. J Comb Optim 27:241–255

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Butenko S, Anderoglu SK, Ursulenko O (2011) On connected domination in unit ball graphs. Optim Lett 5:195–205

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Caro Y, Henning MA (2012) Directed domination in oriented graphs. Discrete Appl Math 160:1053–1063

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crevals S, Östergard PRJ (2015) Independent domination of grids. Discrete Math 338:1379–1384

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dehgardi N, Sheikholeslami SM, Khodkar A (2014) Bounding the paired-domination number of a tree in terms of its annihilation number. Filomat 28:523–529

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Desormeaux WJ, Haynes TW, Henning MA (2014a) Improved bounds on the domination number of a tree. Discrete Appl Math 177:88–94

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Desormeaux WJ, Haynes TW, Henning MA, Yeo A (2014b) Total domination in graphs with diameter 2. J Graph Theory 75:91–103

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Y (1968) Dominating set and converse dominating set of a directed graph. Am Math Mon 75:861–863

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hao G, Qian J (2015) On the sum of out-domination number and in-domination number of digraphs. Ars Comb 119:331–337

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998) Domination in graphs: advanced topics. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koltun V, Papadimitriou CH (2007) Approximately dominating representatives. Theor Comput Sci 371:148–154

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C (1998) Domination in digraphs. J Korean Math Soc 35:843–853

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shan EF, Cheng TCE, Kang LY (2007) Absorbant of generalized de Bruijn digraphs. Inf Process Lett 105:6–11

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Slater PJ (1995) Locating dominating sets and locating-dominating sets. In: Alavi Y, Schwenk A (eds) Graph theory, combinatorics, and applications, proceedings of the seventh quadrennial international conference on the theory and applications of graphs. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1073–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann L (2015) Signed total Roman domination in graphs. J Comb Optim. doi:10.1007/s10878-015-9906-6

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2002) Extended dominating-set-based routing in ad hoc wireless networks with unidirectional links. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 13:866–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSFC (No. 11471273), the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Jiangxi Province of China (No. GJJ150561) and the Doctor Fund of East China University of Technology (No. DHBK2015319).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Qian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, G., Qian, J. Bounds on the domination number of a digraph. J Comb Optim 35, 64–74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-017-0154-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-017-0154-9

Keywords