Skip to main content
Log in

Strategy-proof mechanisms for obnoxious facility game with bounded service range

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the obnoxious facility game with a limited service capacity on a line network, in which all facilities are undesirable and necessary for agents, such as the garbage dumps. The limited service capacity restricts each facility only to serve the agents in its service radius \(r> 0\). All agents prefer to be far away from facilities, but still to be served by a facility. Namely, the distance between an agent and her nearest facility is at most r. In a deterministic or randomized mechanism, based on the addresses reported by the selfish agents, the locations or the location distributions of facilities are determined. The aim of the mechanisms is to maximize the obnoxious social welfare, the total distance between all agents and the facilities, on the premise of each agent being served. On the other hand, each agent tries to maximize her own utility, i.e., the distance from the facility, and she may lie if, by doing so, to get strictly more benefit. We are interested in mechanisms without money to elicit the true location profile (strategy-proofness or group strategy-proofness) and maximize the obnoxious social welfare as much as possible. In this paper, we give the first attempt for this game on a closed interval [0, 1], to design group strategy-proof deterministic and randomized mechanisms for the case of \(\frac{1}{2}\le r\le 1\). The approximation ratios, depending on the radius r, of different mechanisms are explored. We also provide the lower bounds on approximation ratios of deterministic strategy-proof mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alon N, Feldman M, Procaccia A, Tennenholtz M (2009) Strategyproof approximation mechanisms for location on networks. Computing Research Repository-CORR. arXiv:abs/0907.2049

  • Alon N, Feldman M, Procaccia A, Tennenholtz M (2010) Strategyproof approximation of the minimax on networks. Math Oper Res 35:513–526

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Yu W, Zhang G (2013) Strategy-proof approximation mechanisms for an obnoxious facility game on networks. Theor Comput Sci 497:154–163

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Escoffier1 B, Gourv\(\grave{e}\)s L, Thang N, Pascua F, Spanjaard O (2011) Strategy-proof mechanisms for facility location games with many facilities. In: Proceedings of the 2th international conference of algorithmic decision theory (ADT), pp 67–81

  • Feigenbaum I, Sethuraman J (2015) Strategyproof mechanisms for onedimensional hybrid and obnoxious facility location models. In: Workshops at the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

  • Fotakis D, Tzamos C (2010) Winner-imposing strategyproof mechanisms for multiple facility location games. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop of internet and network economics (WINE), pp 234–245

  • Ibara K, Nagamochi H (2012) Charactering mechanisms in obnoxious facility game. COCOA 2012

  • Han Q, Du D, Xu D, Xu Y (2018) Approximate efficiency and strategy-proofness for moneyless mechanisms on single-dipped policy domain. J Glob Optim 70(4):859–873

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Wang Y, Zhou Y (2009) Tighter bounds for facility games. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop of internet and network economics (WINE), pp 137–148

  • Lu P, Sun X, Wang Y, Zhu Z (2010) Asymptotically optimal strategy-proof mechanisms for two-facility games. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on electronic commerce (ACM-EC)

  • Moulin H (1980) On strategy-proofness and single peakedness. Public Choice 35(4):437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei LL, Ye D, Zhang Y (2018a) Approximation strategy-proof mechanisms for obnoxious facility location on a line. J Comb Optim 36(2):549–571

  • Mei L, Li M, Ye D, Zhang G (2018b) Facility location games with distinct desires. Working paper

  • Procaccia A, Tennenholtz M (2009) Approximate mechanism design without money. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on electronic commerce (ACM-EC)

  • Schummer J, Vohra RV (2007) Mechanism design without money. In: Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani V (eds) Algorithmic game theory, chapter 10. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou S, Li M (2015) Facility location games with dual preference. In: Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS), pp 615–623

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiaoming Han.

Additional information

A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Theory and Applications of Models of Computation (TAMC), HongKong.

This research was partially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11871366, 61803279, 11771386, 11728104) and the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities under Grant Number 22220184028.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., Han, Q., Yu, W. et al. Strategy-proof mechanisms for obnoxious facility game with bounded service range. J Comb Optim 37, 737–755 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-018-0344-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-018-0344-0

Keywords