Abstract
We consider a classical principal–agent model in the contract theory. A principal designs the payment \(\mathbf {w}=\left\{ w_{0},w_{1},\ldots ,w_{n}\right\} \) to incentivize the agent to enter into the contract. Given the payment \(\mathbf {w}\), the agent will take hidden actions from her strategy set \(\mathbf {S_{t}^{n}}\) to finish it and from the perspective of the agent, she will select the best strategy to maximize her expected utility. Due to the hidden strategy set, the principal obtains the expected revenue \(R(S_{t}^{n})\) from the agent. Furthermore, the principal has a non-decreasing revenue function r(k), which is common information, where k is the number of successful tasks in the total n independent tasks. The objective of the problem is to maximize the principal’s expected profit, i.e., \(\max _{S,\mathbf {w}}\left\{ R(S_{t}^{n})-P(S_{t}^{n},\mathbf {w})\right\} \), where \(P(S_{t}^{n},\mathbf {w})\) is the agent’s expected payment. The difficulty of this problem is due to the asymmetric information. If the principal knows all the information about the agent, then the optimal contract can be solved by linear programming. Based on Dütting et al. (in: Proceedings of the EC, pp 369–387, 2019), we consider the more general model. When information is asymmetric, we further analyze that the approximation ratio of the linear contract can reach \((1-\alpha _{N})/(1-\alpha _{N}^{N})\), which improves the results of Dütting et al. (in: Proceedings of the EC, pp 369–387, 2019), where \(\alpha _{N}\in [0,1)\) is a given constant and the coefficient of the linear contract.



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babaioff M, Feldman M, Nisan N (2006) Combinatorial agency. In: Proceedings of the EC, pp 18–28
Bichler M, Paulsen P (2018) A principal–agent model of bidding firms in multi-unit auctions. Games Econ Behav 111:20–40
Carroll G (2015) Robustness and linear contracts. Am Econ Rev 105(2):536–563
Corgnet B, Gómez-Miñambres J, González RH (2018) Goal setting in the principal–agent model: weak incentives for strong performance. Games Econ Behav 109:311–326
Cvitanić J, Possamaï D, Touzi N (2018) Dynamic programming approach to principal-agent problems. Finance Stoch 22(1):1–37
Dai S, Nie G, Xiao N (2018) The study of the two-way principal–agent model based on asymmetric information. Wirel Pers Commun 102(2):629–639
Dütting P, Roughgarden T, Talgam-Cohen I (2019) Simple versus optimal contracts. In: Proceedings of the EC, pp 369–387
Gao G, Han X, Ning L, Ting H-F, Zhang Y (2020) Robustness and approximation for the linear contract design. In: Proceedings of the AAIM, pp 273–285
Grant S, Kline JJ, Quiggin J (2018) Contracting under uncertainty: a principal–agent model with ambiguity averse parties. Games Econ Behav 109:582–597
Ho C-J, Slivkins A, Vaughan JW (2016) Adaptive contract design for crowdsourcing markets: bandit algorithms for repeated principal–agent problems. J Artif Intell Res 55:317–359
Ross SA (1973) The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. Am Econ Rev 63(2):134–139
Schosser J (2019) Consistency between principal and agent with differing time horizons: computing incentives under risk. Eur J Oper Res 277(3):1113–1123
Singham DI (2019) Sample average approximation for the continuous type principal–agent problem. Eur J Oper Res 275(3):1050–1057
Singham DI, Cai W (2017) Sample average approximations for the continuous type principal–agent problem: an example. In: Proceedings of the WSC, pp 2010–2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A preliminary version of this paper was in AAIM 2020 (Gao et al. 2020)
Hing-Fung Ting: supported by Hong Kong GRF-17208019. Yong Zhang: supported by NSFC 12071460.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, G., Han, X., Ning, L. et al. Principal–agent problem under the linear contract. J Comb Optim 44, 2286–2301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-021-00723-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-021-00723-3