Abstract
In recent years, thematic exchange-traded funds have arisen and broaden the narrow thinking of purely monetary driven investment decisions. Ethical concerns, a stronger belief in society-shaped trends, or the conformity with personal convictions motivate investors to include non-monetary objectives in so called thematic funds. Thematic investors follow a modified core satellite strategy in which conventional funds ensure diversification. Investors’ non-monetary interests manifest within additional satellite funds. Both portfolios are separately allocated so that inter-portfolio correlation effects are not considered and inefficient core satellite portfolios are allocated. However, in order to reduce the inefficiency of such a core satellite strategy, this study addresses fund providers and develops the idea of tailoring thematic funds to conventional ones. An empirical investigation shows that by easing the efficiency constraint for the satellite portfolio, correlation effects between the portfolios can be exploited. At the expense of an average relative volatility increase of 4.55%, the inefficiency of core satellite portfolios can be reduced by an average of 11.74% compared to volatilities of efficient tri-criterion portfolios. Further analysis of these thematic products shows that tailored products can also be more concentrated within a given theme. This opens up new opportunities for fund providers to become more involved in various thematic trends and at the same time achieve better performance for core satellite investors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952). https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974
Anand, P., Cowton, C.J.: The ethical investor. Exploring dimensions of investment behaviour. J. Econ. Psychol. (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(93)90007-8
Marchioni, U., Antropova, S., Thomson, C., McNaught, C., Schwaiger, K.: Megatrends. An index approach to thematic investing (2016). https://www.ishares.com/uk/individual/en/literature/brochure/ishares-megatrends-thematic-investing-en-gb-rc-end-investor.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2017
Giammattei, G.: Global Megatrends: Capitalizing on Tomorrow’s Trends Today. RBC Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc., Boston (2014)
Sironi, P.: FinTech Innovation. From Robo-advisors to Goal Based Investing and Gamification. Wiley Finance Series. Wiley, Chichester (2016)
Zopounidis, C., Niklis, D., Doumpos, M.: Doumpos, M.: “Financial decision support”. Feature issue editorial. EURO J. Decis. Process. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-018-0080-9
Bérubé, V., Ghai, S., Tétrault, J.: From indexes to insights: the rise of thematic investing. McKinsey Invest. Winter 2014/15(1), 51–56 (2014)
Forster, G.: On theme. Superfunds Mag. 424, 16 (2017)
Methling, F., Nitzsch, R. von: Thematic portfolio optimization—challenging the core satellite approach (2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3227775
Aouni, B., Doumpos, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Steuer, R.E.: On the increasing importance of multiple criteria decision aid methods for portfolio selection. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1475118
Steuer, R.E., Qi, Y., Hirschberger, M.: Multiple objectives in portfolio selection. J. Financ. Dec. Mak. 1(1), 5–20 (2005)
Steuer, R.E., Qi, Y., Hirschberger, M.: Portfolio selection in the presence of multiple criteria. In: Handbook of Financial Engineering (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76682-9_1
Steuer, R.E., Qi, Y., Hirschberger, M.: Suitable-portfolio investors, nondominated frontier sensitivity, and the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection. Ann. Oper. Res. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0137-1
Ballestero, E., Bravo, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M., Plà-Santamaria, D.: Socially responsible investment. A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 25, 55 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.011
Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer, Cham (2017)
Hirschberger, M., Steuer, R.E., Utz, S., Wimmer, M., Qi, Y.: Computing the nondominated surface in tri-criterion portfolio selection. Oper. Res. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1140
Gasser, S.M., Rammerstorfer, M., Weinmayer, K.: Markowitz revisited Social portfolio engineering. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.043
Amenc, N., Malaise, P., Martellini, L.: Revisiting core-satellite investing. Portf. Manag. (2004). https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2004.443322
Magoon, C.: Better than sectors. The case for thematic investing. J. Indexes 12(5), 18–25 (2009)
Brough, M., Shepperson, A.: International Pension Plan Survey Report 2018. Willis Towers Watson (2019)
Zopounidis, C., Galariotis, E., Doumpos, M., Sarri, S., Andriosopoulos, K.: Multiple criteria decision aiding for finance. An updated bibliographic survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.032
Markowitz, H.: Portfolio Selection. Efficient Diversification of Investments, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA (1996)
Ehrgott, M., Klamroth, K., Schwehm, C.: An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00881-0
Utz, S., Wimmer, M., Steuer, R.E.: Tri-criterion modeling for constructing more-sustainable mutual funds. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.035
Evans, J.L., Archer, S.H.: Diversification and the reduction of dispersion. An empirical analysis. J. Finance (1968). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00315.x
Statman, M.: How many stocks make a diversified portfolio? J. Financ. Quant. Anal. (1987). https://doi.org/10.2307/2330969
Tang, G.Y.: How efficient is naive portfolio diversification? An educational note. Omega (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2003.10.002
MSCI: GICS Structure. Effective Sep1, 2016. https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/4547797/GICS+Structure+effective+Sep+1%2C+2016.xls/d8600f87-cc12-4070-912f-08590232441d (2016). Accessed 22 Dec 2017
Sharpe, W.F.: Mutual fund performance. J. Bus. 39(1), 119–138 (1966)
Woerheide, W., Persson, D.: An index of portfolio diversification. Financ. Serv. Rev. 2(2), 73–85 (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Simulation histograms
Appendix: Simulation histograms
Histograms show the results of the simulation with 3826 assets and a random evaluation of thematic assets for different amounts of conventional assets nC. Within the histograms, the different lines show each 1000 results concerning different amounts of thematic assets. Histogram “All” summarizes the 25,000 results of the five previous histograms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Methling, F., von Nitzsch, R. Tailor-made thematic portfolios: a core satellite optimization. J Glob Optim 76, 317–331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-019-00781-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-019-00781-2