Abstract
In this paper, in order to simplify the high order Hermite weighted essentially non-oscillatory (HWENO) finite difference schemes of Liu and Qiu (J Sci Comput 63:548–572, 2015), a new type of HWENO schemes based on compact difference schemes, termed CHWENO (compact HWENO) schemes, is proposed for solving both one and two dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws. The idea of reconstruction in CHWENO schemes is similar to HWENO schemes, however the first derivative values of solution are solved by the compact difference method and only one numerical flux is used in CHWENO schemes, while the derivative equation is needed to be solved and two numerical fluxes are used in HWENO schemes. Compared with the original finite difference weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, CHWENO schemes maintain the compactness of HWENO schemes, which means that only three points are needed for a fifth order CHWENO schemes. Compared with the HWENO schemes, CHWENO schemes avoid solving the complex derivative equations, which can considerably expedite calculating speed. Several numerical tests, including the 1D shock density wave interaction problem and 2D Riemann problem, are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of CHWENO schemes.








Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Adams, N.A., Shariff, K.: A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 127, 27–51 (1996)
Balsara, D.S., Shu, C.W.: Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 160, 405–452 (2000)
Christofi, S.N.: The study of building blocks for essentially non-oscillatory (ENO) schemes. Ph.D. thesis, Brown University (1995)
De, A.K., Eswaran, V.: Analysis of a new high resolution upwind compact scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 218, 398–416 (2006)
Dennis, S., Hudson, J.: Compact h4 finite-difference approximations to operators of Navier–Stokes type. J. Comput. Phys. 85, 390–416 (1989)
Gaitonde, D., Shang, J.S.: Optimized compact-difference-based finite-volume schemes for linear wave phenomena. J. Comput. Phys. 138, 617–643 (1997)
Harten, A.: High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49, 357–393 (1983)
Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., Chakravarthy, S.R.: Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys. 71, 231–303 (1987)
Harten, A., Osher, S.: Uniformly high-order accurate nonoscillatory schemes. I. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24, 279–309 (1987)
Iske, A., Sonar, T.: On the structure of function spaces in optimal recovery of point functionals for ENO-schemes by radial basis functions. Numer. Math. 74, 177–201 (1996)
Jiang, G.S., Peng, D.: Weighted ENO schemes for Hamilton–Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21, 2126–2143 (1997)
Jiang, G.S., Shu, C.W.: Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202–228 (1996)
Jocksch, A., Adams, N.A., Kleiser, L.: An asymptotically stable compact upwind-biased finite-difference scheme for hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 208, 435–454 (2005)
Lafon, F., Osher, S.: High order two dimensional non-oscillatory methods for solving Hamilton–Jacobi scalar equations. J. Comput. Phys. 123, 235–253 (1996)
Lele, S.K.: Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103, 16–42 (1992)
Liu, H., Qiu, J.: Finite difference Hermite WENO schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Sci. Comput. 63, 548–572 (2015)
Liu, H., Qiu, J.: Finite difference Hermite WENO schemes for conservation laws, II: an alternative approach. J. Sci. Comput. 66, 598–624 (2016)
Liu, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, H., Shu, C.W.: A new class of central compact schemes with spectral-like resolution, I: linear schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 248, 235–256 (2013)
Liu, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, H., Shu, C.W.: A new class of central compact schemes with spectral-like resolution, II: hybrid weighted nonlinear schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 284, 133–154 (2015)
Liu, X.D., Osher, S., Chan, T.: Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115, 200–212 (1994)
Osher, S., Shu, C.W.: High-order essentially non-oscillatory schemes for Hamilton–Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28, 907–922 (1991)
Qiu, J., Shu, C.W.: Hermite WENO schemes and their application as limiters for Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method: one-dimensional case. J. Comput. Phys. 193, 115–135 (2004)
Qiu, J., Shu, C.W.: Hermite WENO schemes and their application as limiters for Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method II: two-dimensional case. Comput. Fluids 34, 642–663 (2005)
Ravichandran, K.: Higher order KFVS algorithms using compact upwind difference operators. J. Comput. Phys. 130, 161–173 (1997)
Sengupta, T.K., Ganeriwal, G., De, S.: Analysis of central and upwind compact schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 192, 677–694 (2003)
Shu, C.W.: High Order Weighted Essentially Nonoscillatory Schemes for Convection Dominated Problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2009)
Shu, C.W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77, 439–471 (1988)
Shu, C.W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II. J. Comput. Phys. 83, 32–78 (1989)
Woodward, P., Colella, P.: The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54, 115–173 (1984)
Zhu, J., Qiu, J.: A class of the fourth order finite volume Hermite weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Sci. China Ser. A Math. 51, 1549–1560 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
The research was supported by NSFC Grant 91530325.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Z., Wu, SP. HWENO Schemes Based on Compact Differencefor Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. J Sci Comput 76, 1301–1325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-018-0663-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-018-0663-4