Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancing the Utility of ProstaScint SPECT Scans for Patient Management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This project investigated reducing the artifact content of In-111 ProstaScint SPECT scans for use in treatment planning and management. Forty-one patients who had undergone CT or MRI scans and simultaneous Tc-99m RBC/In-111 ProstaScint SPECT scans were included. SPECT volume sets, reconstructed using Ordered Set-Expectation Maximum (OS-EM) were compared against those reconstructed with standard Filtered Back projection (FBP). Bladder activity in Tc-99m scans was suppressed within an ellipsoidal volume. Tc-99m voxel values were subtracted from the corresponding In-111 after scaling based on peak activity within the descending aorta. The SPECT volume data sets were merged with the CT or MRI scans before and after processing. Volume merging, based both on visual assessment and statistical evaluation, was not affected. Thus iterative reconstruction together with bladder suppression and blood pool subtraction may improve the interpretation and utility of ProstaScint SPECT scans for patient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eubank, W. B., Mankoff, D. A., Schmiedl, U. P., Winter, T. C. III, Fisher, E. R., Olshen, A. B., Graham, M. M., and Eary, J. F. Imaging of oncologic patients: Benefit of combined CT and FDG PET in the diagnosis of malignancy. Am. J. Roentgenol. 171:1103–1110, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mizowaki, T., Cohen, G. N., Fung, A. Y., and Zaider, M. Towards integrating functional imaging in the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation: The registration of the MR spectroscopy imaging to ultrasound/CT images and its implementation in treatment planning. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 54:1558–1564, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sannazzari, G. L., Ragona, R., Ruo Redda, M. G., Giglioli, F. R., Isolato, G., and Guarneri, A. CT-MRI image fusion for delineation of volumes in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Br. J. Radiol. 75:603–607, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wahl, R. L., Quint, L. E., Cieslak, R. D., Aisen, A. M., Koeppe, R. A., and Meyer, C. R. Anatometabolic tumor imaging: Fusion of FDG PET with CT or MRI to localize foci of increased activity. J. Nucl. Med. 34:1190–1197, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wahl, R. L., Quint, L. E., Greenough, R., Meyer, C. R., White, R. I., and Orringer, M. B. Staging of mediastinum nonsmall cell lung cancer with FDG-PET, CT, and fusion images: Preliminary prospective evaluation. Radiology 191:371–377, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kooy, H. M., Dunbar, S. F., Tarbell, N. J., Mannarino, E., Ferarro, N., Shusterman, S., Bellerive, M., Finn, L., McDonough, C. V., and Loeffler, J. S. Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 28:1229–1234, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schad, L. R., Boesecke, R., Schlegel, W., Hartmann, G. H., Sturm, V., Strauss, L. G., and Lorenz, W. J. Three-dimensional image correlation of CT, MR, and PET studies in radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumors. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 11:948–954, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Small, E. J. Advances in prostate cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 11:226–235, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy, G. P., Elgamal, A. A., Troychak, M. J., and Kenny, G. M. Follow-up ProstaScint scans verify detection of occult soft-tissue recurrence after failure of primary prostate cancer therapy. Prostate 42:315–317, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Petronis, J. D., Regan, F., and Lin, K. Indium-111 Capromab Pendetide (Prostascint) imaging to detect recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 23:672–677, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinkle, G. H., Burgers, J. K., Neal, C. E., Texter, J. H., Kahn, D., Williams, R. D., Maguire, R., Rogers, B., Olsen, J. O., and Badalament, R. A. Multicenter radioimmunoscintigraphic evaluation of patients with prostate carcinoma using Indium-111 Capromab Pendetide. Cancer 83:739–747, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manyak, M. J. Capromab Pendetide immunoscintigraphy: Connecting the dots for prostate cancer imaging. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 15:127–130, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manyak, M. J., Hinkle, G. H., Olsen, J. O., Chiaccherini, R. P., Partin, A. W., Piantadosi, S., Burgers, J. K., Texter, J. H., Neal, C. E., Libertino, J. A., Wright, G. L. Jr., and Maguire, R. T. Immunoscintigraphy with Indium-111-Capromab Pendetide: Evaluation before definitive therapy in patients with prostate cancer. Urology 54:1058–1063, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raj, G. V., Partin, A. W., and Polascik, T. J. Clinical utility of Indium 111-Capromab Pendetide immunoscintigraphy in the detection of early recurrent prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 94:987–996, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rini, B. I., and Small, E. J. Prostate cancer update. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 14:288–291, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooperberg, M. R., Broering, J. M., Litwin, M. S., Lubeck, D. P., Mehta, S. S., Henning, J. M., Carroll, P. R., and CaPSURE Investigators. The Contemporary Management of prostate cancer in the United States: Lessons from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), a National Disease Registry. J. Urol. 171:1393–1401, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Quintana, J. C., and Blend, M. J. The dual-isotope prostascint imaging procedure: Clinical experience and staging results in 145 patients. Clin. Nucl. Med. 25:33–46, 200.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Long, D. T., King, M. A., and Sheehan, J. Comparative evaluation of image segmentation methods for volume quantization in SPECT. Med. Phys. 19:483–489, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. King, M. A., Long, D. T., and Brill, A. B. SPECT volume quantization: Influence of spatial resolution, source size and shape, and voxel size. Med. Phys. 18:1016–1024, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamilton, R. J., Blend, M. J., Pelizzari, C. A., Milliken, B. D., and Vijayakumar, S. Using vascular structure for CT-SPECT registration in the pelvis. J. Nucl. Med. 40:347–351, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas, C. T., Bradshaw, P. T., Pollock, B. H., Montie, J. E., Taylor, J. M. G., Thames, H. D., McLaughlin, P. W., deBiose, D. A., Hussey, D. H., and Wahl, R. L. Indium-111-Capromab Pendetide radioimmunoscintigraphy and prognosis for durable biochemical response to salvage radiation therapy in men after failed prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 21:1715–1721, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schettino, C. J., Kramer, E. L., Noz, M. E., Taneja, S., Padmanabhan, P., and Lepor, H. Impact of fusion of Indium-111 Capromab Pendetide volume data sets with those from MRI or CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 183:519–524, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ellis, R. J., Kim, E. Y., Conant, R., Sodee, D. B., Spirnak, J. P., Dinchman, K. H., Beddar, S., Wessels, B., Resnick, M. I., and Kinsella, T. J. Radioimmunoguided imaging of prostate cancer foci with histopathological correlation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 49:1281–1286, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sodee, D. B., Ellis, R. J., Samuels, M. A., Spirnak, J. P., Poole, W. F., Riester, C., Martanovic, D. M., Stonecipher, R., and Bellon, E. M. Prostate cancer and prostate bed SPECT imaging with Prostascint: Semiquantitative correlation with prostatic biopsy results. Prostate 37:140–148, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellis, R. J., Sodee, D. B., Spirnak, J. P., Dinchman, K. H., O’Leary, A. W., Samuels, M. A., Resnick, M. I., and Kinsella, T. J. Feasibility and acute toxicities of radioimmunoguided prostate brachytherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 48:683–687, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Duchesne, G. M. Radiation for prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2:73–81, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bruyant, P. B. Analytic and iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT. J. Nucl. Med. 43:1343–1358, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Riddell, C., Carson, R. E., Carrasquillo, J. A., Libutti, S. K., Danforth, D. N., Whatley, M., and Bacharach, S. L. Noise reduction in oncology DFG PET images by iterative reconstruction: A quantitative assessment. J. Nucl. Med. 42:1316–1323, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  29. deJonge, F. A. A., and Blokland, K. A. K. Statistical tomographic reconstruction: How many more iterations to go? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 26:1247–1250, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, B. Y., deWyngaert, J. K., Noz, M. E., Maguire, G. Q. Jr., Murphy-Walcott, A., and Kramer, E. L. Unmasking true signal/tumor information from ProstaScint scans. Proc. SPIE Med. Imaging SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 5370:1980–1990, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reddy, D. P., Maguire, G. Q. Jr., Noz, M. E., and Kenny, R. Automating image format conversion —Twelve years and twenty-five formats later. In Lemke, H. U., Inamura, K., Jaffee, C. C., and Felix, R. (eds.), Computer-Assisted Radiology – CAR’93, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 253–258, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Noz, M. E., Maguire, G. Q. Jr., Zeleznik, M. P., Kramer, E. L., Mahmoud, F., and Crafoord, J. A versatile functional-anatomic image fusion method for volume data sets. J. Med. Syst. 25:297–307, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorniak, R. J., Kramer, E. L., Maguire, G. Q. Jr., Noz, M. E., Schettino, C. J., and Zeleznik, M. P. Evaluation of a semiautomatic 3D fusion technique applied to molecular imaging and MRI brain/frame volume data sets. J. Med. Syst. 27:141–156, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. deWyngaert, J. K., Noz, M. E., Ellerin, B., Kramer, E. L., Maguire, G. Q. Jr., and Zeleznik, M. P. Procedure for unmasking localization information from ProstaScint scans for prostate radiation therapy treatment. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 60:654–662, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Maguire, G. Q. Jr., Noz, M. E., Rusinek, H., Jaeger, J., Kramer, E. L., Sanger, J. J., and Smith, G. Graphics applied to image registration. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 11:20–29, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn., Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. vandenberghe, S., D’Asseler, Y., van de Walle, R., et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithms in nuclear medicine. Comput. Med. Imaging Graphics 25:105–111, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Erdi, Y. E., Wessels, B. W., Loew, M. H., and Erdi, A. K. Threshold estimation in single emission computed tomography and planar imaging for clinical radioimmunotherapy. Cancer Res. 55(Suppl.):5823–5826, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilyn E. Noz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noz, M.E., Chung, G., Lee, B.Y. et al. Enhancing the Utility of ProstaScint SPECT Scans for Patient Management. J Med Syst 30, 123–132 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-7987-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-005-7987-y

Keywords

Navigation