Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act: Does It Live Up to the Promise?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) was passed by Congress with two formidable tasks: (1) reform the insurance market; and (2) simplify healthcare administrative processes. From these ambitious beginnings, HIPAA has since taken on major healthcare issues including administrative simplification, security, privacy, and patient confidentiality.

In November 1997, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (DHHS) introduced the proposed “standards” for what is referred to as “administrative simplification”. But, establishing the standards and guidelines necessary for administrative compliance was not an easy undertaking. DHHS estimated that 400 different formats were used in the US for healthcare claims processing.

Three years later (August 2000), the Final Rule for Standards for Electronic Transactions and Code Sets was published by DHHS. The rule provided for national standardization of the most common healthcare transactions and several code sets. The compliance deadline for implementation of the new transactions and code sets was set for October, 2002. In January 2001, Congress enacted The Administrative Simplification Compliance Act to provide the industry with additional time to reach compliance. Yet, recent survey results by Phoenix Health Systems and the Health Information and Management Society (HIMSS) indicate many providers and payers are not fully compliant with the security and privacy regulations mandated by HIPAA. This issue threatens the effectiveness of administrative simplification and the integrity of healthcare information.

Overall, HIPAA does offer the promise of a more efficient and effective means of sharing and disseminating vital healthcare information. But, many experts have concerns that the implementation and maintenance of HIPAA standards and policies will become a financial burden for many in the healthcare industry. Although DHHS has established mandates for the healthcare industry, many deadlines have been extended and the standards of administrative simplification continue to evolve over time. Others question whether the Department of Health and Human Services is capable of spearheading an information technology revolution in the healthcare industry. Unfortunately, it may take several years before the industry is able to realize any true cost savings from administrative simplification. Yet, few can question how HIPAA has revolutionized information technology in the healthcare industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauman, Carrie M (2001) HIPAA compliance and benefits: administrative simplification and proposed rules. Presented at the 2001 Healthcare Informatics and e.MD Expo and Conference, April 18, 2001 Chicago, IL. Retrieved June 10, 2003 from http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/expo/presentations/h214.pps

  2. Fox S, Wilson R (2001) The new transactions compliance extension: What it means to you. HIPAAdvisory. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from http://www.hipaadvisory.com/regs/asca/extension.htm

  3. Guerin Gue D (2002) Transactions and code sets: For geeks only? HIPAAdvisory. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from http://www.hipaadvisory.com/action/tcs/geeksonly.htm, July

  4. HIMSS/Phoenix Health Systems (2005) US Healthcare Industry HIPAA Compliance Survey Results: Winter 2005. HIPAAdvisory. Retrieved from http://www.hipaadvisory.com/action/surveynew/winter2005.htm

  5. Jesitus J (2000) Between a rock and a hard place. Manag Healthc 24–29, September

  6. Kadas, Richard M (2002) Cashing in on Technology's Dividends. Healthcare Informatics. Retrieved June 10, 2003 from http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/issue/2002/09_02/hipaa_kadas.htm

  7. Kuriyan J (2001) HIPAA and MCOs: Administrative simplification or IT modernization? Health Manag Technol 40–41, October

  8. Phoenix Health Systems. Guide to transactions and code sets standards (May, 2000) HIPAAdvisory. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from http://www.hipaadvisory.com/action/archives/Trans-CodeSetsGuide.htm

  9. Scott JS (November, 1997) Administrative simplification and you. Healthc Financ Manag 26–27

  10. U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. (2002, June) Data Content and Code Sets: The Devil is in the Details. GPO

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra Lynn Banks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banks, D.L. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act: Does It Live Up to the Promise?. J Med Syst 30, 45–50 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-006-7403-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-006-7403-2

Keywords

Navigation