Abstract
This paper explores the role of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in facilitating communication between physicians, nurses, patients and family members. Thirty-three critical care unit nurses and physicians were interviewed regarding the APACHE III CDSS. This qualitative, descriptive study suggests that registered nurses and physicians are primarily motivated to use CDSS when this technology allows them to forecast the potential outcomes of decisions prior to actually making those decisions. These forecasts are used to advocate for care decisions with other disciplines, patients and their family members. Implications for professional practice and recommendations for future research are described.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Manojlovich, M., and DeCicco, B., Healthy work environments, nurse–physician communication, and patients’ outcomes. American Journal of Critical Care. 16:536–543, 2007. (Nov).
Reader, T. W., Flin, R., and Cuthbertson, B. H., Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 13:732–736, 2007, (Dec).
Erlen, J. A., and Sereika, S. M., Critical care nurses, ethical decision-making and stress. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 26:953–961, 1997, (Nov).
Baggs, J. G., and Schmitt, M. H., Intensive care decisions about level of aggressiveness of care. Research in Nursing & Health. 18:345–355, 1995.
Hamric, A. B., and Blackhall, L. J., Nurse–physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate. Critical Care Medicine. 35:422–429, 2007, (Feb).
Fagin, C. M., Collaboration between nurses and physicians: No longer a choice. Academic Medicine. 67:295–303, 1992.
Shannon, S. E., Mitchell, P. H., and Cain, K. C., Patients, nurses, and physicians have differing views of quality of critical care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 34:173–179, 2002.
Wocial, L. D., Achieving collaboration in ethical decision making: strategies for nurses in clinical practice. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing. 15:150–159, 1996, (May–Jun).
Thomas, E. J., Sexton, J. B., and Helmreich, R. L., Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Critical Care Medicine. 31:956–959, 2003, (Mar).
Stein, L. I., The doctor–nurse game. Archives of General Psychiatry. 16:699–673, 1967.
Castella, X., Artigas, A., Bion, J., and Kari, A., A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: Results of a multicenter, multinational study. Critical Care Medicine. 23:1327–1335, 1995.
Butters, S., and Eom, S., Decision support systems in the health care industry. Journal of Systems Management. 43:28–31, 1992.
Silver, M. S., Decision support systems: Directed and non-directed change. Information Systems Research. 1:47–70, 1990.
Shortliffe, E. H., The adolescence of artificial intelligence in medicine: Will the field come of age in the 90’s? Artificial Intelligence. 5:93–106, 2003.
Strauss, A. L., and Corbin, J., Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, 1990.
Chenitz, W. C., and Swanson, J. M., Qualitative research using grounded theory. In: Chenitz, W. C., Swanson, and J. M. (Eds.), From practice to grounded theoryAddison-Wesley, Menlo Park, pp. 3–15, 1986.
Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L., the discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine De Gruyter, Hawthorne, 1999.
Knaus, W. A., Wagner, D. P., and Lynn, J., Short-term mortality predictions for critically ill hospitalized adults: Science and ethics. Science. 18:345–488, 1991.
Watts, C. M., and Knaus, W. A., The case for using objective scoring systems to predict intensive care unit outcomes. Critical Care Clinics. 10:73–89, 1994.
Creswell, J. W., Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1998.
Mallach, E. G., Understanding decision support systems and expert systems. Irwin, Chicago, 1993.
Zimmerman, J. E., Wagner, D. P., Draper, E. A., and Knaus, W. A., Improving intensive care unit discharge decisions: supplementing physician judgment with predictions of next day risk for life support. Critical Care Medicine. 22:1373–1384, 1994, (Sep).
Gibson, R. F., Haug, P. J., and Horn, S. D., Lessons from evaluating an automated patient severity index. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 3:349–358, 1996.
Kruse, J. A., Thill-Baharozian, M. C., and Carlson, R. W., Comparison of clinical assessment with APACHE II for predicting mortality risk in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. Journal of the American Medical Association. 260:1739–1742, 1988.
Ludwigs, U., and Hulting, J., Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring system in acute myocardial infarction: A prospective validation study. Critical Care Medicine. 23:854–859, 1995.
Knaus, W. A., Wagner, D. P., Draper, E. A., Zimmerman, J. E., Bergner, M., and Bastos, P. G., The APACHE III prognostic system: Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 100:1619–1163, 1991.
Barie, P. S., Hydo, L. J., and Fischer, E., Comparison of APACHE II and III scoring systems for mortality prediction in critical surgical illness. Archives of Surgery. 130:77–82, 1995.
Knaus, W. A., Draper, E. A., Wagner, D. P., and Zimmerman, J. E., An evaluation of outcomes from intensive care in major medical centers. Annals of Internal Medicine. 104:410–418, 1986.
Hadorn, D. C., Keeler, E. B., Rogers, W. H., and Brook, R. H., Assessing the performance of mortality prediction models. Rand, Santa Monica, 1993.
Zimmerman, J. E., Kramer, A. A., McNair, D. S., and Malila, F. M., Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Critical Care Medicine. 34:1297–1310, 2006, May.
Glaser, B. G., Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, 1992.
Hutchinson, S., Grounded theory: the method. In: Munhall, P. L., Oiler, and C. J. (Eds.), Nursing research: a qualitative perspective Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, pp. 111–130, 2006.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank our consultants, Barbara J. Bowers and Sandra Ward from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Research funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and the Charles Eckberg Foundation supported this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, S., Courtney, K.L. & Benham-Hutchins, M. Decision Support in Multi-Professional Communication. J Med Syst 33, 59–65 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9164-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9164-6