Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Primary Care Physician's Attitude Towards the GERMAN e-Health Card Project—Determinants and Implications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Germany e-health cards will be distributed nationwide to over 80 million patients. Given the impending mandatory introduction of the e-health technology, the objective of this study was to examine the determinants of primary care physicians' acceptance of the technological innovation. The study was conducted prior to the introduction of the e-health cards. A questionnaire survey was carried out addressing primary care physicians from different fields. The reduction of medication error rates and the improvement of communication between medical caregivers are central aspects of the perceived usefulness. Primary care physicians rate their involvement in the process of the development of the technology and their own IT expertise concerning the technological innovation as rather low. User involvement and IT expertise can explain 46 % of the variance of perceived usefulness of the e-health card. User involvement plays a crucial role in the adoption of the German e-health card. Primary care physician's perspective should be represented in the process of developing and designing the technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. To Err Is Human. Building a Safer Health System. In: Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., and Donaldson, M. S. (eds). p. 223. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1999.

  2. Ammenwerth, E., Brender, J., Nykanen, P., Prokosch, H. U., Rigby, M., and Talmon, J., Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inf. 73:6479–491, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitten, P. S., and Richardson, J. D., A scientific approach to the assessment of telemedicine acceptance. J Telemed Telecare. 8:4246–248, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Demiris, G., Speedie, S. M., and Hicks, L. L., Assessment of patients’ acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology. J Med Syst. 28:6575–579, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karsh, B. T., Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Qual. Saf Health Care. 13:5388–394, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, F. D., A Technology Acceptance Model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory an results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, 1986.

  7. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R., User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 35:8982–1003, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Venkatesh, V., Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research. 11:4342–365, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal, R., and Smith, R. H., Time flies when you are having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q. 24:4665–694, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saade, R., and Bahli, B., The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 42:2317–327, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R., Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 22:141111–1132, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A., Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 19:189–212, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84:2191–215, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paré, G., Sicotte, C., and Jacques, H., The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians’ acceptance of clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 13:2197–205, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ives, B., and Olson, M. H., User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Manage Sci. 30:5586–603, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hyclak, T. H., and Kolchin, M. G., Worker involvement in implementing new technology. Technovation. 4:143–151, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Swanson, E. B., Management information systems: appreciation and involvement. Manage Sci. 21:178–188, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Franz, C. R., and Robey, D., Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decis Sci. 17:329–356, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leonard-Barton, D., and Sinha, D. K., Developer–user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer. Acad Manage J. 36:51125–1139, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Korunka, C., Weiss, A., and Karetta, B., Effects of new technologies with special regard for the implementation process per se. J Organ Behav. 14:331–348, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blobel, B., and Pharow, P., A model driven approach for the German health telematics architectural framework and security infrastructure. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 76:169–175, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rienhoff, O., and Verhey, J., Akzeptanz ist die notwendige Voraussetzung für einen Erfolg der Gesundheitskarte. In: Hempel, V., Jäckel, A., and Reum, L. (Eds). Telemedizinführer Deutschland. pp. 48–49 Darmstadt, 2005.

  24. Bailey, D. W., Review note: Janice M. Morse, Janice M. Swanson & Anton J. Kuzel (Hrsg.) (2001). The nature of qualitative evidence. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (Online-Journal) 3(4)2002.

  25. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D., A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. 46:2186–204, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis, F. D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13:3319–339, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor, S., and Todd, P., Understanding information technology usage. a test of competing models. Information Systems Research. 6:2144–176, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Morgan, D. L., Focus groups. Annu Rev Sociol. 22:1129–152, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Morgan, D. L., The focus group guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p. p. 103, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prüfer, P., and Rexroth, M., Verfahren zur Evaluation von Survey-Fragen: Ein Überblick. ZUMA-Nachrichten. 39:2095–116, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pfaff, H., and Ernstmann, N., Akzeptanz-Untersuchung zur Gesundheitskarten-Einführung (AUGE). Abschlussbericht einer Studie im Auftrag der Ärztekammer Nordrhein. In: Medizinische Fakultät der Universität zu Köln (ed). pp. 1–115 Köln, 2005.

  32. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T., Quasi-experimentation. design & analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ross, E. C., and Mirowsky, J., The worst place and the best face. In: Fielding, N. (Ed). Interviewing, pp. 329–336. Sage, London, 2003.

  34. Locander, W., Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N., An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion. In: Fielding, N. (Ed). Interviewing, pp. 336–349. Sage, London, 2003.

  35. Güler, N. F., and Übeyli, E. D., Theory and applications of telemedicine. J Med Syst. 26:3199–220, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson, C. M., and Turley, J. P., The significance of cognitive modeling in building healthcare interfaces. Int J Med Inf. 75:2163–172, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, C. T., Yang, P. T., Yeh, Y. T., and Wang, B. L., The impacts of smart cards on hospital information systems—an investigation of the first phase of the national health insurance smart card project in Taiwan. Int J Med Inf. 75:2173–181, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study is financed by the Medical Association of North Rhine, Germany. The authors wish to thank Viktor Krön and Robert Schäfer under whose initiative and guidance the study has been initiated and completed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Ernstmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ernstmann, N., Ommen, O., Neumann, M. et al. Primary Care Physician's Attitude Towards the GERMAN e-Health Card Project—Determinants and Implications. J Med Syst 33, 181–188 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9178-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9178-0

Keywords

Navigation