Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Benchmarking Electronic Medical Records Initiatives in the US: a Conceptual Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a conceptual model for benchmarking the use of clinical information systems within healthcare organizations. Additionally, it addresses the benefits of clinical information systems which include the reduction of errors, improvement in clinical decision-making and real time access to patient information. The literature suggests that clinical information systems provide financial benefits due to cost-savings from improved efficiency and reduction of errors. As a result, healthcare organizations should adopt such clinical information systems to improve quality of care and stay competitive in the marketplace. Our research clearly documents the increased adoption of electronic medical records in U.S. hospitals from 2005 to 2007. This is important because the electronic medical record provides an opportunity for integration of patient information and improvements in efficiency and quality of care across a wide range of patient populations. This was supported by recent federal initiatives such as the establishment of the Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) to create an interoperable health information infrastructure. Potential barriers to the implementation of health information technology include cost, a lack of financial incentives for providers, and a need for interoperable systems. As a result, future government involvement and leadership may serve to accelerate widespread adoption of interoperable clinical information systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000). To err is human : building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., et al. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England journal of medicine, 348, 2635–2645. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa022615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Institute of Medicine (U.S.) (2001). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm : a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, D., Menachemi, N., & Brooks, R. G. (2005). Diffusion of information technology supporting the institute of medicine's quality chasm care aims. Journal for healthcare quality, 27, 24–32, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burke, D., Menachemi, N., & Brooks, R. (2006). Health care CIOs: assessing their fit in the organizational hierarchy and their influence on information technology capability. Health care management (Frederick), 25, 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Q, 27, 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dos Santos, B., & Peffers, K. (2005). Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications-first movers and early followers in ATMs. Organisation scientifique, 6, 241–259. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.3.241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bates, D. W., & Gawande, A. A. (2003). Improving safety with information technology. New England journal of medicine, 348, 2526–2534. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa020847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison, J. P., & Palacio, C. (2006). The role of clinical information systems in health care quality improvement. Health care management (Frederick), 25, 206–212.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brooks, R. G., Menachemi, N., Burke, D., et al. (2005). Patient safety-related information technology utilization in urban and rural hospitals. Journal of medical systems, 29, 103–109. doi:10.1007/s10916-005-2999-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gandhi, T. K. (2005). Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another. Annals of internal medicine, 142, 352–358.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jain, A., Atreja, A., Harris, C. M., et al. (2005). Responding to the rofecoxib withdrawal crisis: a new model for notifying patients at risk and their health care providers. Annals of internal medicine, 142, 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kucher, N., Koo, S., Quiroz, R., et al. (2005). Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. New England journal of medicine, 352, 969–977. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa041533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ornstein, S., Jenkins, R. G., Nietert, P. J., et al. (2004). A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine, 141, 523–532.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hynes, D. M., Perrin, R. A., Rappaport, S., et al. (2004). Informatics resources to support health care quality improvement in the veterans health administration. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11, 344–350. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Menachemi, N., Burkhardt, J., Shewchuk, R., et al. (2006). Hospital information technology and positive financial performance: a different approach to finding an ROI. Journal of healthcare management, 51, 40–58 discussion 58–49.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koppel, R., Metlay, J. P., Cohen, A., et al. (2005). Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA, 293, 1197–1203. doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nebeker, J. R., Hoffman, J. M., Weir, C. R., et al. (2005). High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital. Archives of internal medicine, 165, 1111–1116. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.10.1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Valdes, I., Kibbe, D., Tolleson, G., et al. (2003). Metcalfe's law predicts reduced power of electronic medical record software. AMIA Annual symposium proceedings, 2003, 1038.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Valdes, I., Kibbe, D. C., Tolleson, G., et al. (2004). Barriers to proliferation of electronic medical records. Inform Prim Care, 12, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Garrido, T., Jamieson, L., Zhou, Y., et al. (2005). Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study. BMJ, 330, 581. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7491.581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. HIMMS Analytical Database and EMR Adoption Model (2007). HIMMS Analytics.

  23. Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., Prosser, L. A., et al. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. American journal of medicine, 114, 397–403. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00057-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., Bower, A., et al. (2005). Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. The adoption of interoperable EMR systems could produce efficiency and safety savings of $142–$371 billion. Health affairs (Millwood), 24, 1103–1117. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor, R., Bower, A., Girosi, F., et al. (2005). Promoting health information technology: is there a case for more-aggressive government action? There are sufficient reasons for the federal government to invest now in policies to speed HIT adoption and accelerate its benefits. Health affairs (Millwood), 24, 1234–1245. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. ONCHIT Web Site.

  27. Loonsk, J. W., McGarvey, S. R., Conn, L. A., et al. (2006). The public health information network (PHIN) preparedness initiative. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 1–4. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Muscatello, D. J., Churches, T., Kaldor, J., et al. (2005). An automated, broad-based, near real-time public health surveillance system using presentations to hospital emergency departments in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health, 5, 141. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank HIMSS (Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society) Analytics for access to the 2005 and 2007 HIMSS AnalyticsSM Database for research purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8 Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA

    Carlos Palacio

  2. Health Administration Program, University of North Florida, Brooks College of Health, 1 UNF Drive, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA

    Jeffrey P. Harrison

  3. HIMSS Analytics, Chicago, IL, USA

    David Garets

Authors
  1. Carlos Palacio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeffrey P. Harrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Garets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey P. Harrison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palacio, C., Harrison, J.P. & Garets, D. Benchmarking Electronic Medical Records Initiatives in the US: a Conceptual Model. J Med Syst 34, 273–279 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9238-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9238-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation