Skip to main content
Log in

Separating Managerial Inefficiency from Influences of the Operating Environment: An Application in Dialysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In any production unit, the ability to achieve technical efficiency is influenced by characteristics of the external operating environment. This study uses the Greek dialysis sector to employ a previously reported frontier procedure to obtain a measure of managerial inefficiency that controls for exogenous features. The sample consisted of 124 dialysis facilities. Two inputs —nursing staff and dialysis machines— and one output —dialysis sessions— were used in an input-oriented, variable-returns-to-scale DEA model. Input slacks were regressed against environmental characteristics such as ownership, location, operating years and facility size, and parameter estimates were used to adjust primary input data. New efficiency scores were generated to measure managerial inefficiency. Older, public, regional facilities were operating under unfavorable circumstances, whereas newer, private, Athens-based facilities under favorable conditions. This respectively generated lower and higher efficiency scores than would have been attained on a level “playing field”. After adjustment, scores reflected only management inefficiency and could be compared fairly. This study emphasizes the importance of efficiency comparisons, which take into account external conditions beyond the influence of management, as these have been shown to under— or overstate true management inefficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozgen, H., and Ozcan, Y., A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: an examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs. Health Serv. Res. 37:711–732, 2002. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.00045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerard, K., and Roderick, P., Comparison of apparent efficiency of haemodialysis satellite units in England and Wales using data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 19:533–539, 2003. doi:10.1017/S0266462303000473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kontodimopoulos, N., and Niakas, D., Efficiency measurement of hemodialysis units in Greece with data envelopment analysis. Health Policy. 71:195–204, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozgen, H., and Ozcan, Y., Longitudinal analysis of efficiency in multiple output dialysis markets. Health Care Manage. Sci. 7:253–261, 2004. doi:10.1007/s10729-004-7534-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kontodimopoulos, N., and Niakas, D., A 12-year analysis of Malmquist total factor productivity in dialysis facilities. J. Med. Syst. 30:333–342, 2006. doi:10.1007/s10916-005-9005-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kontodimopoulos, N., and Niakas, D., An estimate of lifelong costs and QALYs in renal replacement therapy based on patients’ life expectancy. Health Policy. 86:85–96, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaitelidou, D., Ziroyanis, P. N., Maniadakis, N., and Liaropoulos, L. L., Economic evaluation of hemodialysis: implications for technology assessment in Greece. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 21:40–46, 2005. doi:10.1017/S0266462305050051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fried, H. O., Schmidt, S. S., and Yaisawarng, S., Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency. J. Prod. Anal. 12:249–267, 1999. doi:10.1023/A:1007800306752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3:429–444, 1978. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W., Models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30:1078–1092, 1984. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Farrell, M. J., The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. [Ser A]. 120:252–281, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lovell, C. A. K., Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In: Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., and Schmidt, S. S. (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruggiero, J., Performance evaluation when non-discretionary factors correlate with technical efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 159:250–257, 2004. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00403-X.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoff, A., Second stage DEA: comparison of approaches for modeling the DEA score. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181:425–435, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.019.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wooldridge, J. M., Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosko, M. D., Impact of internal and external environmental pressures on hospital inefficiency. Health Care Manage. Sci. 2:63–74, 1999. doi:10.1023/A:1019031610741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chu, H. L., Liu, S. Z., and Romeis, J. C., Does the implementation of responsibility centers, total quality management, and physician fee programs improve hospital efficiency? Evidence from Taiwan hospitals. Med. Care. 40:1223–1237, 2002. doi:10.1097/00005650-200212000-00009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pilyavsky, A. I., Aaronson, W. E., Bernet, P. M., Rosko, M. D., Valdmanis, V. G., and Golubchikov, M. V., East-west: does it make a difference to hospital efficiencies in Ukraine? Health Econ. 15:1173–1186, 2006. doi:10.1002/hec.1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kooreman, P., Nursing home care in The Netherlands: a nonparametric efficiency analysis. J. Health Econ. 13:301–316, 1994. doi:10.1016/0167-6296(94)90029-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosko, M. D., Chilingerian, J. A., Zinn, J. S., and Aaronson, W. E., The effects of ownership, operating environment, and strategic choices on nursing home efficiency. Med. Care. 33:1001–1021, 1995. doi:10.1097/00005650-199510000-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kontodimopoulos, N., Moschovakis, G., Aletras, V., and Niakas, D., The relationship between eligible service population and efficiency in primary health care providers in Greece. Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 5:14, 2007. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-5-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zavras, A. I., Tsakos, G., Economou, C., and Kyriopoulos, J., Using DEA to evaluate efficiency and formulate policy within a Greek national primary health care network. Data Envelopment Analysis. J. Med. Syst. 26:285–292, 2002. doi:10.1023/A:1015860318972.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Linna, M., Nordblad, A., and Koivu, M., Technical and cost efficiency of oral health care provision in Finnish health centres. Soc. Sci. Med. 56:343–353, 2003. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00032-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chilingerian, J. A., Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals: a multivariate analysis of best practices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80:548–574, 1995. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)00137-2.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, P., Model misspecification in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 73:233–252, 1997. doi:10.1023/A:1018981212364.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Held, P. J., and Pauly, M. V., Competition and efficiency in the end stage renal disease program. J. Health Econ. 2:95–118, 1983. doi:10.1016/0167-6296(83)90001-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., Schmidt, S. S., and Yaisawarng, S., Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. J. Prod. Anal. 17:157–174, 2002. doi:10.1023/A:1013548723393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Street, A., How much confidence should we place in efficiency estimates? Health Econ. 12:895–907, 2003. doi:10.1002/hec.773.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Worthington, A. C., Frontier efficiency measurement in health care: a review of empirical techniques and selected applications. Med. Care Res. Rev. 61:135–170, 2004. doi:10.1177/1077558704263796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kontodimopoulos, N., Nanos, P., and Niakas, D., Balancing efficiency of health services and equity of access in remote areas in Greece. Health Policy. 76:49–57, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheldon, T. A., and Smith, P. C., Equity in the allocation of health care resources. Health Econ. 9:571–574, 2000. doi:10.1002/1099-1050(200010)9:7<571::AID-HEC555>3.0.CO;2-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Kontodimopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kontodimopoulos, N., Papathanasiou, N.D., Tountas, Y. et al. Separating Managerial Inefficiency from Influences of the Operating Environment: An Application in Dialysis. J Med Syst 34, 397–405 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9252-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9252-2

Keywords

Navigation