Skip to main content
Log in

A Health Examination System Integrated with Clinical Decision Support System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health examinations play a key role in preventive medicine. We propose a health examination system named Health Examination Automatic Logic System (HEALS) to assist clinical workers in improving the total quality of health examinations. Quality of automated inference is confirmed by the zero inference error where during 6 months and 14,773 cases. Automated inference time is less than one second per case in contrast to 2 to 5 min for physicians. The most significant result of efficiency evaluation is that 3,494 of 4,356 (80.2%) cases take less than 3 min per case for producing a report summary. In the evaluation of effectiveness, novice physicians got 18% improvement in making decisions with the assistance of our system. We conclude that a health examination system with a clinical decision system can greatly reduce the mundane burden on clinical workers and markedly improve the quality and efficiency of health examination tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Fitzmaurice, J. M., Adams, K., and Eisenberg, J. M., Three decades of research on computer applications in health care medical informatics support at the agency for healthcare research and quality. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9:144–160, 2002. doi:10.1197/jamia.M0867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuh, C. S., and Kuo, K. L., The decision support system used in HEALS (Health Examination Automatic Logic System). 2006 American Medical Informatics Association Spring Congress Poster. May 16–18, 2006.

  3. Kuo, K. L., and Fuh, C. S., HEALS: Health Examination Automatic Logic System. 2006 American Medical Informatics Association Spring Congress Poster. May 16–18, 2006.

  4. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, Evidence-based clinical prevention. 2000.

  5. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: Periodic health examination monograph: report of the Task Force to the Conference of Deputy Ministers of Health. 1980.

  6. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2006: Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0570. 2006.

  7. Ohno-Machado, L., Gennari, J. H., Murphy, S. N., et al., The GuideLine interchange format: a model for representing guidelines. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5:357–372, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, D., Peleg, M., Tu, S. W., et al., Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models. Int. J. Med. Inform. 68:59–70, 2002. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00065-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett, J. W., and Glasziou, P. P., Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Med. J. Aust. 178:217–222, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Casalino, L., Gillies, R. R., Shortell, S. M., et al., External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA. 289:434–441, 2003. doi:10.1001/jama.289.4.434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., et al., Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:742–770, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, S. T., How information technologies have improved both productivity and quality of health care. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 29:38–41, 2005. doi:10.1080/03091900412331271130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nobel, J., Bridging the knowledge-action gap in diabetes: information technologies, physician incentives and consumer incentives converge. Chronic Illn. 2:59–60, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sequist, T. D., Cullen, T., and Ayanian, J. Z., Information technology as a tool to improve the quality of American Indian health care. Am. J. Public Health. 95:2173–2179, 2005. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.052985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sim, I., Gorman, P., Greenes, R. A., et al., Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8:527–534, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Evans, R. S., Pestotnik, S. L., Classen, D. C., et al., A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N. Engl. J. Med. 338:232–238, 1998. doi:10.1056/NEJM199801223380406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunt, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Hanna, S. E., et al., Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes a systematic review. JAMA. 280:1339–1346, 1998. doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnston, M. E., Langton, K. B., Haynes, R. B., et al., Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome: a critical appraisal of research. Ann. Intern. Med. 120:135–142, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Osheroff, J. A., Teich, J. M., Middleton, B., et al., A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14:141–145, 2007. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Teich, J. M., Osheroff, J. A., Pifer, E. A., et al., Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan report of the joint clinical decision support workgroup. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12:365–376, 2005. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rector, A. L., Thesauri and formal classifications: terminologies for people and machines. Methods Inf. Med. 37:501–509, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenbloom, S. T., Miller, R. A., Johnson, K. B., et al., Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13L:277–288, 2006. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Russell, S. J., and Norvig, P., Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, New Jersey, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kantor, G. S., Wilson, W. D., and Midgley, A., Open-source software and the primary care EMR. J. Am. Med. Informat. Assoc. 10:616, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. The, P.H.P.: Group, PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor. [cited on Dec. 27, 2008]. Available from: http://www.php.net/.

  26. Sun Microsystems, Inc.: About the Java Technology. [cited on Dec. 27, 2008]. Available from: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/getStarted/intro/definition.html.

  27. W3C, Extensible Markup Language (XML). [cited on Dec. 27, 2008]. Available from: http://www.w3.org/XML/.

  28. The Apache Software Foundation, The Apache HTTP Server Project.: [cited on Dec. 27, 2008]. Available from: http://httpd.apache.org/.

  29. The Apache Software Foundation: Apache Tomcat. [cited on Dec. 27, 2008]. Available from: http://tomcat.apache.org/.

  30. Linux Online, Inc.: What is Linux. [cited on Dec. 27, 2008]. Available from: http://www.linux.org/info/index.html.

  31. Lhotska, L., Marik, V., and Vlcek, T., Medical applications of enhanced rule-based expert systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 63:61–75, 2001. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00172-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Achour, S., Dojat, M., Rieux, C., et al., A UMLS-based knowledge acquisition tool for rule-based clinical decision support system development. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8:351–360, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Saade, R., Tsoukas, A., and Tsoukas, G., Prototyping a decision support system in the clinical environment: assessment of patients with osteoporosis OSTEODSS. Expert Syst. Appl. 27:427–438, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2004.05.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang, M., and Chen, M., Integrated design of the intelligent web-based Chinese Medical Diagnostic System (CMDS)—systematic development for digestive health. Expert Syst. Appl. 32:658–673, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R., Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3:60–95, 1992. doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Meijden, M. J. v. d., Tange, H. J., Troost, J., et al., Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10:235–243, 2003. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Balas, E. A., Information systems can prevent errors and improve quality. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8:398–399, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  38. McRoy, S. W., and Hirst, G., Misunderstanding and the negotiation of meaning. Knowl.-Based Syst. 8:126–134, 1995. doi:10.1016/0950-7051(95)98374-F.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank for the assistance of colleagues at RenAi Branch, Taipei City Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiou-Shann Fuh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuo, KL., Fuh, CS. A Health Examination System Integrated with Clinical Decision Support System. J Med Syst 34, 829–842 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9297-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9297-2

Keywords

Navigation