Skip to main content
Log in

Choosing the Most Efficient Database for a Web-Based System to Store and Exchange Ophthalmologic Health Records

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Response times are a critically important parameter when implementing any telematics application. Hence, it is important to evaluate those times to check the performance of the system. Different database will get different response times. This paper presents a response time comparative analysis of the Web system of Electronic Health Record (EHRs), TeleOftalWeb, with the four databases used: Oracle 10 g, dbXML 2.0, Xindice 1.2, and eXist 1.1.1. Final goal of the comparison is choosing the database providing lower response times in TeleOftalWeb. Results obtained using the four databases proposed give the native XML database eXist an edge which, added to other features such as being a free software and easy to set up, makes us opting for it. TeleOftalWeb is being used by 20 specialists from the Institute of Applied Ophthalmobiology (Instituto de Oftalmobiología Aplicada, IOBA) of the University of Valladolid, Spain. At this time, there are more than 1000 EHRs and over 2000 fundus photographs of diabetic patients stored in the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van der Meijden, M. J., Tange, H., Troost, J., Hasman, A., Development and implementation of an EPR: How to encourage the user. Int. J. Med. Informat. 64:173–185, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gloth, F., Coleman, E., Phillips, S., Zorowitz, R., Using Electronic Health Records to improve care: Will “High tech” allow a return to “High Touch” medicine? J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 6(4):270–275, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, D., and Newell, L. M., A physician's perspective: Deploying the EMR. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 16:71–79, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., Dowd, B., Medical groups’ adoption of Electronic Health Records and information systems. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 24:1323–1333, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gurley, L., (Ed.), Advantages and disadvantages of the Electronic Medical Record. American Academy of Medical Administrators, 2004.

  6. Nainil, C., and Chheda, M. S., Electronic Medical Records and continuity of care records—The utility theory. Application of Information Technology and Economics, 2005.

  7. Simborg, D. W., Promoting Electronic Health Record adoption. Is it the correct focus? J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15(15):127–129, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charles, S., and Goldberg, H., Electronic patient records and the impact of the internet. Int. J. Med. Informat. 60:77–83, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Halamka, J. D., Osterland, C., Safran, C., CareWeb™, a web-based medical record for an integrated health care delivery system. Int. J. Med. Informat. 54:1–8, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ginsburg, M., Pediatric Electronic Health Record interface design: the PedOne system. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10, 2007.

  11. Chew, S. J., Cheng, H. M., Lam, D. S. C., Cheng, A. C. K., Leung, A. T. S., Chua, J. K. H., Yu, C. P., Balakrishnan, V., Chan, W. K. OphthWeb-cost-effective telemedicine for ophthalmology. Hong Kong Med. J. 4:300–304, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, R., Enberg, G., Klein, G., Julius—a template based supplementary Electronic Health Record system. BMC Med. Informat. Decis. Making 7:10, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Los, R., van Ginneken, A. M., de Wilde, M., van der Lei, J., OpenSDE: Row modeling applied to generic structured data entry. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 11:162–165, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, E. H., Web-based personal-centered Electronic Health Record for elderly population. Proceedings of the 1st Distributed Diagnosis and Home Healthcare (D2H2) Conference, pp. 144–147, 2006.

  15. Hansen, I. B., CipherMe: Personal Electronic Health Records in the hands of patients-owners. Proceedings of the 1st Distributed Diagnosis and Home Healthcare (D2H2) Conference, pp. 148–151, 2006.

  16. Wen, H. C., Ho, Y. S, Jian, W. S., Li, H. C., Hsu, Y. H., Scientific production of Electronic Health Record research, 1991–2005. Comput. Meth. Programs in Biomed. 86:191–196, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Balsamo, S., Marzolla, M., Di Marco, A., Inverardi, P., Experimenting different software architectures performance techniques: A case study. Fourth International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP 2004), pp. 115–119, 2004.

  18. De la Torre, I., Hornero, R., López, M., López, M. I., Ophthalmologic Electronic Health Records using HL7 and DICOM standards, thirteenth annual international and exposition of the American Telemedicine Association (ATA 2008), Telemed. J. e-Health 14:100–101, ISSN: 1530–5627, Seattle, EE.UU, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hornero, R., López, M. I., Acebes, M., Calonge, T., Teleophthalmology for diabetic retinopathy screening in a rural area of Spain. Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Telemedicine Association (ATA’2003). Telemed. J. e-Health, p. 111, 2003.

  20. Oracle Database Online Documentation 10 g Release 2. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from http://youngcow.net/doc/oracle10g/index.htm.

  21. The dbXML Group, L.L.C. DbXML. Native XML Database. Retrieved September 1, 2009, from http://www.dbxml.com.

  22. Davis, K. C., Zhan, Y., Davis, R. B., An XML/XPath query language and XMark performance study. Proceedings of Symposium on Applications and the Internet, pp. 422–427, 2003.

  23. Meier, W., eXist: An open source native XML database, lecture notes in computer science (LNCS). Berlin: Springer 2593(1):169–183, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Apache Software Foundation. Apache Xindice. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from http://xml.apache.org/xindice.

  25. Noh, S. Y., Gadia, S. K., Ma, S., An XML-based methodology for parametric temporal database model implementation. J. Syst Software, 81:929–948, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under the project TEC2008-02241.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel de la Torre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de la Torre, I., Díaz, F.J., Antón, M. et al. Choosing the Most Efficient Database for a Web-Based System to Store and Exchange Ophthalmologic Health Records. J Med Syst 35, 1455–1464 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9422-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9422-2

Keywords

Navigation