Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of an Auxiliary Stimulation on Motor Function Restoration by FES

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is a technology to generate neural activity in an artificial way to activate muscles. However, as reported by some researchers, the human responses to FES are likely to be affected by several factors, such as spasticity, muscle fatigue, nerve habituation and so forth. Consequently, the function restoration by FES is neither durable, nor stable. In order to realize long-term and stable FES assistance, this study investigated whether and why an Auxiliary Stimulation (AS) to the Gastrocnemius, with current frequency ranged from 2000 to 6000 Hz, could alleviate the symptom of spasticity and muscle fatigue caused by the stimulation to the Tibialis Anterior. We have developed a portable auxiliary stimulator, and performed experiments to verify its effectiveness. The results showed that our approach enabled comparatively stable and durable function restoration assistance. Moreover, for understanding underlying neuromuscular processes elicited by the AS and its qualitative nature, this study also measured the Hoffmann-reflex (H-reflex) in soleus muscle before and after the AS, to interpret the effect of the Auxiliary Stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hambrecht, F. T., and Reswick, J. B., Functional Electrical Stimulation Application in Neural Prosthesic. Marcel Dekker, 1977.

  2. Liberson, W. T., Functional electrotherapy stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of the hemiplegic patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 42:101–105, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McNeal, D. R., Analysis of a model for excitation of my elinated nerve. IEEE7kms. Biomd. Eng. 23:329–337, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Handa, Y., and Hoshimiya, N., Functional electrical stimulation for the control of the upper extremities. Med. Pro. Technology 12:51–63, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lance, J. W., Symposium synopsis. In: Feldman, R. G., Young, R. R., and Koella, W. P. (Eds.), Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control. Year Book Medical, St Louis, pp. 485–494, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katz, R. T., and Rymer, W. Z., Spastic hypertonia: Mechanisms and measurement. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 70:144–155, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kinya, F., Feasibility of physiome-based functional electrical stimulation, IEICE technical report. ME and Bio Cybernetics. 102(728):17–20, 2003.

  8. Matsunaga, T., Shimada, Y., and Sato, N., Muscle fatigue from intermittent stimulation with low and high frequency, electrical pulses. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80:48–53, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas, F., Jochen, Q., Robert, R., and Günther, S., Walking with walk! IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 10:38–48, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Makoto, M., Relationship between AFO and Neurological Organization in Spastic Hemiplegia. Jpn. Phys. Ther. Assoc. 27(5):145–150, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bogataj, U., Gros, N., Kljajic, M., Acimovic, R., and Malezic, M., A comparison between conventional therapy and multichannel functional stimulation therapy, rehabilitation of gait in patients with hemiplegia. Phys. Ther. 75:490–502, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Albright, A. L., Neurosurgical treatment of spasticityand other pediatric movement disorders. J. Child Neurol. 18(1):67–78, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bakhtiary, A. H., and Fatemy, E., Does electrical stimulation reduce spasticity afterstroke? A randomized controlled study. Clin. Rehabil. 418–425, 2008.

  14. Hazlewood, M. E., Brown, J. K., Rowe, P. J., and Sao, F., Therapeutic electrical stimulation in the treatment of hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 36(8):661–673, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kralj, T., and Grobelnik, B., T-10 paraplegic patient walking in parallel bars, 1979

  16. Masuda, M., Kiyoshige, Y., and IHASHI, K., Influence of therapeutic electrical stimulation on contractile properties of human paralyzed muscles. Jpn. Phys. Ther. Assoc. 25(3):121–127, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. http://www.compex-training.jp/shouhin.html

  18. Hoffmann, P., Beitrag zur Kenntnis der menschlichen Reflexe mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der elektrischen Erscheinungen. Arch. Anat. Physiol. 1:223–246, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Magladery, J. W., and McDougal, D. B., Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man, I: Identification of certain reflexes in the electromyogram and the conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibers. Bull. Johns Hopkins 86:265–289, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Riann, M. P., Christopher, D. I., and Mark, A. H., The Hoffmann reflex: Methodologic considerations and applications for use in sports medicine and athletic training research. J. Athl. Train. 39(3):268–277, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Iwatsuki, H., Effects of vibratory stimulation on antagonist motoneuron excitability under different frequencies. J. Jpn. Phys. Ther. Assoc. 18(1):41–44, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sköld, C., Lönn, L., Harms-Ringdahl, K., Hultling, C., Levi, R., Nash, M., and Seiger, A., Effects of functional electrical stimulation training for six months on body composition and spasticity in motor complete tetraplegic spinal cord-injured individuals. J. Rehabil. Med. 34:25–32, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Levin, M. F., and Hui-Chan, C., Are H and stretch reflexes in hemiparesis reproducible and correlated with spasticity? J. Neurol. 240:63–71, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reboul, J., and Rosenblueth, A., The action of alternating currentsupon the electrical excitability of nerve. Am. J. Physiol. 125:205–215, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bowman, B. R., and McNeal, D. R., Response of single alpha motoneurons to high-frequency pulse train: Firing behavior and conduction block phenomenon. Appl. Neurophysiol. 49:121–138, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baoping Yuan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuan, B., Sun, G., Gomez, J. et al. The Effect of an Auxiliary Stimulation on Motor Function Restoration by FES. J Med Syst 35, 855–861 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9517-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9517-9

Keywords

Navigation