Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intelligent Medical Disease Diagnosis Using Improved Hybrid Genetic Algorithm - Multilayer Perceptron Network

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An improved genetic algorithm procedure is introduced in this work based on the theory of the most highly fit parents (both male and female) are most likely to produce healthiest offspring. It avoids the destruction of near optimal information and promotes further search around the potential region by encouraging the exchange of highly important information among the fittest solution. A novel crossover technique called Segmented Multi-chromosome Crossover is also introduced. It maintains the information contained in gene segments and allows offspring to inherit information from multiple parent chromosomes. The improved GA is applied for the automatic and simultaneous parameter optimization and feature selection of multi-layer perceptron network in medical disease diagnosis. Compared to the previous works, the average accuracy of the proposed algorithm is the best among all algorithms for diabetes and heart dataset, and the second best for cancer dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee, S., Lee, T., Jin, G., and Hong, J., An Implementation of Wireless Medical Image Transmission System on Mobile Devices. J. Med. Syst. 32(6):471–480, 2008. doi:10.1007/s10916-008-9153-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Qi, H., Kong, L., Wang, C., Miao, L. A., Hand-held Mosaicked Multispectral Imaging Device for Early Stage Pressure Ulcer Detection. J. Med. Syst. 35 (5):895–904, 2010. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9508-x.

  3. Daliri, M., Automated Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease using the Scale-Invariant Feature Transforms in Magnetic Resonance Images. J. Med. Syst. 36 (2):995–1000, 2012. doi:10.1007/s10916-011-9738-6.

  4. Wagholikar, K., Mangrulkar, S., Deshpande, A, Sundararajan, V., Evaluation of Fuzzy Relation Method for Medical Decision Support. J. Med. Syst. 36 (1):233–239, 2012. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9472-5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bani Amer, M., Al-Ebbini, L. Fuzzy Approach for Determination the Optimum Therapeutic Parameters in Neuromuscular Stimulation Systems. J. Med. Syst. 34 (4):435–443, 2010. doi:10.1007/s10916-009-9256-y.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan, B., Sun, G., Gomez, J., Ikemoto, Y., Gonzarlez, J., Murai, C., Acharya, U. R., Yu, W., Ino, S. The Effect of an Auxiliary Stimulation on Motor Function Restoration by FES. J. Med. Syst. 35 (5):855–861, 2011. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9517-9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cybenko, G., Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signal 2(4):303–314, 1989. doi:10.1007/bf02551274.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Paliwal, M., and Kumar, U. A., Neural networks and statistical techniques: A review of applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(1):2–17, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian, J., Li, M., and Chen, F., Dual-population based coevolutionary algorithm for designing RBFNN with feature selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(10):6904–6918, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rudy, S., and Huan, L., Neural-network feature selector. IEEE T Neural Networ. 8(3):654–662, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monirul Kabir, M., Monirul Islam, M., and Murase, K., A new wrapper feature selection approach using neural network. Neurocomputing 73(16–18):3273–3283, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rocha, M., Neves, J., Imam, I., Kodratoff, Y., El-Dessouki, A., and Ali, M., Preventing Premature Convergence to Local Optima in Genetic Algorithms via Random Offspring Generation. Multiple Approaches to Intelligent Systems, vol 1611. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 127–136, 1999. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48765-4_16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, W., Li, D., and Zhu, L., An improved genetic algorithm for optimal feature subset selection from multi-character feature set. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(3):2733–2740, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marinakis, Y., Marinaki, M., A hybrid genetic - Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for the vehicle routing problem. Expert. Syst. Appl. 37 (2):1446–1455, 2010. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.085.

  15. Lee, C.-P., and Leu, Y., A novel hybrid feature selection method for microarray data analysis. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(1):208–213, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsieh, S.-T., Sun, T.-Y., and Liu, C.-C., Potential offspring production strategies: An improved genetic algorithm for global numerical optimization. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(8):11088–11098, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Q., Ullah, S., and Zhang, C., An improved genetic algorithm for robust permutation flowshop scheduling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 56(1):345–354, 2011. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-3149-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg, D., Genetic algorithms in search and optimization, Istth edition. Addison-wesley, Boston, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Whitley, D., Starkweather, T., and Bogart, C., Genetic algorithms and neural networks: optimizing connections and connectivity. Parallel Comput. 14(3):347–361, 1990. doi:10.1016/0167-8191(90)90086-O.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saxena, A., and Saad, A., Evolving an artificial neural network classifier for condition monitoring of rotating mechanical systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 7(1):441–454, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2005.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. {UCI} Machine Learning Repository, University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml, 2010.

  22. Demuth, H., and Beale, M., Neural network toolbox user’s guide, version 4. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prechelt, L., Proben1: A set of neural network benchmark problems and benchmarking rules. Technical Report, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1994.

  24. Hall, M. A., Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 1999.

  25. Alba, E., and Chicano, J. F., Training Neural Networks with GA Hybrid Algorithms. In: Deb, K. (Ed.), Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO 2004, vol 3102. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp. 852–863, 2004. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_87.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Socha, K., and Blum, C., An ant colony optimization algorithm for continuous optimization: application to feed-forward neural network training. Neural Comput. Appl. 16(3):235–247, 2007. doi:10.1007/s00521-007-0084-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project is supported by Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation Malaysia, Science fund Grant entitle “Development of Computational Intelligent Infertility Detection System based on Sperm Motility Analysis” and Universiti Sains Malaysia Research University-Postgraduate Research Grant Scheme entitled ‘Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network Hybrid Intelligence’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadzil Ahmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, F., Mat Isa, N.A., Hussain, Z. et al. Intelligent Medical Disease Diagnosis Using Improved Hybrid Genetic Algorithm - Multilayer Perceptron Network. J Med Syst 37, 9934 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9934-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9934-7

Keywords

Navigation