Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Web Information Retrieval for Health Professionals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a Web Information Retrieval System (WebIRS), which is designed to assist the healthcare professionals to obtain up-to-date medical knowledge and information via the World Wide Web (WWW). The system leverages the document classification and text summarization techniques to deliver the highly correlated medical information to the physicians. The system architecture of the proposed WebIRS is first discussed, and then a case study on an application of the proposed system in a Hong Kong medical organization is presented to illustrate the adoption process and a questionnaire is administrated to collect feedback on the operation and performance of WebIRS in comparison with conventional information retrieval in the WWW. A prototype system has been constructed and implemented on a trial basis in a medical organization. It has proven to be of benefit to healthcare professionals through its automatic functions in classification and summarizing the medical information that the physicians needed and interested. The results of the case study show that with the use of the proposed WebIRS, significant reduction of searching time and effort, with retrieval of highly relevant materials can be attained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Housel, T., and Bell, A. A., Measuring and managing knowledge. McGraw Hill, Irwin, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, G. B., and Sethi, A., Matching records in a national medical patient index. Commun. ACM 44(9):83–88, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ybarra, M. L., and Suman, M., Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey. Int. J. Med. Inform. 75(1):29–41, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilmour, J. A., Scott, S. D., and Huntington, N., Nurses and Internet health information: a questionnaire survey. J. Adv. Nurs. 61(1):19–28, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McHugh, S. M., Corrigan, M., Morney, N., Sheikh, A., Lehane, E., and Hill, A. D. K., A quantitative assessment of changing trends in Internet usage for cancer information. World J. Surg. 35(2):253–257, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers, S. N., Rozek, A., Aleyaasin, N., Promod, P., and Lowe, D., Internet use among head and neck cancer survivors in the North West of England. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 50(3):208–214, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holzinger, A., Geierhofer, R., Modritscher, F., and Tatzl, R., Semantic information in medical information systems: utilization of text mining techniques to analyze medical diagnoses. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 14(22):3781–3795, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casebeer, L., Bennett, N., and Kristofco, R., Physician Internet medical information seeking and on-line continuing education use patterns. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 22:33–42, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings, N. R., and Wooldridge, M. J., Agent technology: foundations, applications, and markets. Springer, Berlin, 1998.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., and Schütze, H., Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press, U.K., 2008.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Vakali, A., and Pallis, G., Web data management practices: emerging techniques and technologies. Idea Group Publishing, U.S.A., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Velasquez, J. D., and Palade, V., Adaptive web sites: a knowledge extraction from web data approach. Ios Press, Netherlands, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tao, X., Li, Y., and Zhong, N., A knowledge-based model using ontologies for personalized web information gathering. Web Intell. Agent Syst. 8(3):235–254, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalichman, S. C., Weinhardt, L., and Benotsch, E., Internet access and internet use for health information among people living with HIV-AIDS. Patient Educ. Couns. 46(2):109–116, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Risch, N. A., Kwon, H. T., and Scarbrough, W., Minority primary care physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices on eye health and preferred sources of information. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 101(12):1247–1253, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walczak, S., A multiagent architecture for developing medical information retrieval agents. J. Med. Syst. 27(5):479–498, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Craan, F., and Oleske, D. M., Medical information and the Internet: do you know what you are getting? J. Med. Syst. 26(6):511–518, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ku, Y., Chiu, C., and Liou, B. H., “Applying text mining to assist people who inquire HIV/AIDS information from Internet”. In: Proceedings ISI 2008 Workshops. pp. 440–448, 2008.

  19. Szulencki, P., “Number of pages on Internet according to Google”, available at: http://www.seoblogr.com/google/number-of-pages-on-internet-according-to-google (accessed 15 April 2011), 2008.

  20. Antonio do Prado, H., and Ferneda, E., Emerging technologies of text mining: techniques and applications. Information Science Reference, U.S.A, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berry, M. W., Survey of text mining: clustering, classification and retrieval. Springer, New York, 2004.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Song, M., and Wu, Y. F., Handbook of research on text and web mining technologies. Information Science Reference, U.S.A., 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Han, J., and Kamber, M., Data mining: concept and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ting, S. L., Shum, C. C., Kwok, S. K., Tsang, A. H. C., and Lee, W. B., Data mining in biomedicine: current applications and further directions for research. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 2(3):150–159, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu, W. H., Lin, R. S., Chan, Y. C., and Chen, K. H., Using Web resources to construct multilingual medical thesaurus for cross-language medical information retrieval. Decis. Support. Syst. 45(3):585–595, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Patil, S. B., and Kumaraswamy, Y. S., Intelligent and effective heart attack prediction system using data mining and artificial neural network. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 31(4):642–656, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mostafa, J., and Lam, W., Automatic classification using supervised learning in a medical document filtering application. Inf. Process. Manag. 36(3):415–444, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, Z., and Chu, W. W., Knowledge-based query expansion to support scenario-specific retrieval of medical free text. Inf. Retr. 10(2):173–202, 2007.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Elhadad, N., Kan, M. Y., Klavans, J. L., and McKeown, K. R., Customization in a unified framework for summarizing medical literature. Artif. Intell. Med. 33(2):179–198, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lewis, D. D., “Naive Bayes at 40: the independence assumption in information retrieval”. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 4–15, 1998.

  31. McCallum, A., and Nigam, K., “A comparison of event models for Naive Bayes text classification”. In: Proceedings of AAAI-98 Workshop Learning for Text Categorization. 1998.

  32. Zhan, J. M., Loh, H. T., and Liu, Y., Gather customer concerns from online product reviews—a text summarization approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2):2107–2115, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lloret, E., Llorens, H., Moreda, P., Saquete, E., and Palomar, M., Text summarization contribution to semantic question answering: new approaches for finding answers on the web. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 26(12):1125–1152, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fan, W., Wallace, L., Rich, S., and Zhang, Z., Tapping the power of text mining. Commun. ACM 49(9):76–82, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cothey, V., Web-crawling reliability. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55(14):1228–1238, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Olston, C., and Najork, M., Web crawling. Now Publishers Inc, Hanover, M.A., 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Salton, G., Automatic text processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Addison-Wesley, Reading, M.A., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, Y., and Chute, C. G., An example-based mapping method for text categorization and retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 12(3):252–277, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chakrabarti, S., Roy, S., and Soundalgekar, M. V., Fast and accurate text classification via multiple linear discriminant projection. Int. J. Very Large Data Bases 12(2):170–185, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Patwardhan, S., and Pedersen, T., Using WordNet-based context vectors to estimate the semantic relatedness of concepts. National Science Foundation Faculty, U.S.A., 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, J., Huang, H., Tian, S., and Qu, Y., Feature selection for text classification with Naïve Bayes. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3):5432–5435, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mladeni, D., and Grobelnik, M., Feature selection on hierarchy of web documents. Decis. Support. Syst. 35(1):45–87, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shang, W., Huang, H., Zhu, H., Lin, Y., Qu, Y., and Wang, Z., A novel feature selection algorithm for text categorization. Expert Syst. Appl. 33(1):1–5, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lan, M., Sung, S. Y., Low, H. B., and Tan, C. L., “A comparative study on term weighting schemes for text categorization”. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN-05). Vol. 1, pp. 546–551, 2005.

  45. Aizawa, A., An information-theoretic perspective of tf-idf measures. Inf. Process. Manag. 39(1):45–65, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Radev, D. R., Jing, H. Y., and Tam, D., Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents. Inf. Process. Manag. 40(6):919–938, 2004.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu, H. C., Luk, Y. P., and Wong, K. F., Interpreting TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 26(3):13–37, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Isa, D., Kallimani, V. P., and Lee, L. H., Using the self organizing map for clustering of text documents. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(5):9584–9591, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lin, S. S., A document classification and retrieval system for R&D in semiconductor industry—a hybrid approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3):4753–4764, 2009. Part 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Xhemali, D., Hinde, C. J., and Stone, R. G., Naive Bayes vs. decision trees vs. neural networks in the classification of training web pages. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 4(1):16–23, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ou, S., Khoo, S. G., and Goh, D. H., Automatic multidocument summarization of research abstracts: design and user evaluation. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(10):1419–1435, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jacobsen, I., Booch, G., and Rumbaugh, J., The unified software development process. Addison Wesley, Boston, M.A., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ting, J. S. L., Kwok, S. K., Tsang, A. H. C., Lee, W. B., and Yee, K. F., “Experiences sharing of implementing template-based electronic medical record system (TEMRS) in a Hong Kong medical organization”. J. Med. Syst. 35(6):1605–1615, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Acknowledgement is given to Dr. Peter Lo, Dr. Francis Liu, Dr. C.W. Lo and Miss Maggie Poon for their guidance on issues in clinical coding and medical knowledge in general. The authors would also like to express their sincere thanks to the Research Committee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University for providing the financial support for this research work.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no potential conflicts of interest in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    S. L. Ting & Eric W. K. See-To

  2. The York Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, Heslington, York, YO10 5GD, UK

    Y. K. Tse

Authors
  1. S. L. Ting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric W. K. See-To
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. K. Tse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Ting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ting, S.L., See-To, E.W.K. & Tse, Y.K. Web Information Retrieval for Health Professionals. J Med Syst 37, 9946 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9946-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9946-3

Keyword

Search

Navigation