Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Improving Operating Room Turnover Time: A Systems Based Approach

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Operating room (OR) turnover time (TT) has a broad and significant impact on hospital administrators, providers, staff and patients. Our objective was to identify current problems in TT management and implement a consistent, reproducible process to reduce average TT and process variability. Initial observations of TT were made to document the existing process at a 511 bed, 24 OR, academic medical center. Three control groups, including one consisting of Orthopedic and Vascular Surgery, were used to limit potential confounders such as case acuity/duration and equipment needs. A redesigned process based on observed issues, focusing on a horizontally structured, systems-based approach has three major interventions: developing consistent criteria for OR readiness, utilizing parallel processing for patient and room readiness, and enhancing perioperative communication. Process redesign was implemented in Orthopedics and Vascular Surgery. Comparisons of mean and standard deviation of TT were made using an independent 2-tailed t-test. Using all surgical specialties as controls (n = 237), mean TT (hh:mm:ss) was reduced by 0:20:48 min (95 % CI, 0:10:46–0:30:50), from 0:44:23 to 0:23:25, a 46.9 % reduction. Standard deviation of TT was reduced by 0:10:32 min, from 0:16:24 to 0:05:52 and frequency of TT≥30 min was reduced from 72.5to 11.7 %. P < 0.001 for each. Using Vascular and Orthopedic surgical specialties as controls (n = 13), mean TT was reduced by 0:15:16 min (95 % CI, 0:07:18–0:23:14), from 0:38:51 to 0:23:35, a 39.4 % reduction. Standard deviation of TT reduced by 0:08:47, from 0:14:39 to 0:05:52 and frequency of TT≥30 min reduced from 69.2 to 11.7 %. P < 0.001 for each. Reductions in mean TT present major efficiency, quality improvement, and cost-reduction opportunities. An OR redesign process focusing on parallel processing and enhanced communication resulted in greater than 35 % reduction in TT. A systems-based focus should drive OR TT design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACGME:

Accreditation council for graduate medical education

CI:

Confidence interval

CRNA:

Certified registered nurse anesthetist

CTO:

Call-to-order

EUHM:

Emory University Hospital Midtown

FTE:

Full time equivalent

H&P:

History & physical

hh:mm:ss:

Hours:minutes:seconds

NPV:

Net present value

OR:

Operating room

PACU:

Post-anesthesia care unit

TT:

Turnover time (Wheels Out → Wheels In)

References

  1. Jeang, A., and Chiang, A., New indicators based on personnel cost for management efficiency in a hospital. J. Med. Syst. 36(3):1205–1222, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Toby, G., Sharon, P., Lyles, A., et al., Surgical unit time utilization review: Resource utilization and management implications. J. Med. Syst. 12(3):169–179, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. To err is Human: Building a safer health system. Institutes of Medicine. 1999.

  4. Sexton, J. B., Makary, M. A., Tersigni, A. R., et al., Teamwork in the operating room: Frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology 105(5):877–884, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman, D. M., Sokal, S. M., Chang, Y., and Berger, D. L., Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing. Ann. Surg. 243(1):10–14, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krupka, D. C., and Sandberg, W. S., Operating room design and its impact on operating room economics. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 19(2):185–191, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Head, S. J., Seib, R., Osborn, J., et al., A “swing room” model based on regional anesthesia reduces turnover time and increases case throughput. Can. J. Anesth. 58(8):725–732, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Overdyk, F. J., Harvey, S. C., Fishman, R. L., and Shippey, F., Successful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions. Anesth. Analg. 86(4):896–906, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stodd, K., Ortiz, A., Tenzer, I., et al., Operating room benchmarking: The Kaiser Permanente experience. Permanente J. 2(1):5–16, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kodali, B. S., Kim, K. D., Flanagan, H., et al., Variability of subspecialty-specific anesthesia-controlled times at two academic institutions. J. Med. Syst. 38(1):1–8, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandberg, W. S., Daily, B., Egan, M., et al., Deliberate perioperative systems design improves operating room throughput. Anesthesiology 103(2):406–418, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marjamaa, R. A., Torkki, P. M., Hirvensalo, E. J., and Kirvelä, O. A., What is the best workflow for an operating room? A simulation study of five scenarios. Health Care Manag. Sci. 12(2):142–146, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson, J. L., Chamberlin, J., and Kroenke, K., Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc. Sci. Med. 52(4):609–620, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner, T. F., Nnadozie, M. U., Davis, B. A., and Kirk, S., Patient anxiety and patient satisfaction in hospital-based and freestanding ambulatory surgery centers. J. Nurs. Care Qual. 20(3):238–243, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peccora, C. D., Gimlich, R., Cornell, R. P., et al., anesthesia report card—A customizable tool for performance improvement. J. Med. Syst. 38(9):1–10, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weiser, T. G., Haynes, A. B., Dziekan, G., et al., Effect of a 19-Item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population. Ann. Surg. 251(5):976–980, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dexter, F., Abouleish, A. E., Epstein, R. H., Whitten, C. W., and Lubarsky, D. A., Use of operating room information system data to predict the impact of reducing turnover times on staffing costs. Anesth. Analg. 97(4):336–337, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abouleish, A. E., Dexter, F., Whitten, C. W., Zavaleta, J. R., and Prough, D. S., Quantifying net staffing costs due to longer-than-average surgical case durations. Anesthesiology 100(2):403–412, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rupp, S., Operating room turnover time not affected by resident teaching model. Anesthesiology 91(3):U450, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Urman, R. D., Sarin, P., Mitani, A., Philip, B., and Eappen, S., Presence of anesthesia resident trainees in day surgery unit has mixed effects on operating room efficiency measures. Ochsner J. 12(1):25–29, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hawthorne effect. Merrian Webster Dictionary. A Encyclopedia Britannica Company. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hawthorne%20effect. Accessed September 20, 2013.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to recognize members of the operating room team at the Emory University Hospital Midtown for their support in this initiative.

Ankeet S. Bhatt was supported for summer 2012 by a fellowship from The Emory Clinic, an entity of Emory Healthcare, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. Sponsors or funders were not involved in any process of this study including but not limited to: design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, or preparation, review, or approval of this manuscript.

Ankeet S. Bhatt and Peter J. Deckers had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Author disclosure information

Nothing to disclose.

Author contributions

Study conception and design: Bhatt, Carlson, Deckers

Acquisition of data: Bhatt, Carlson

Analysis and interpretation of data: Bhatt, Carlson, Deckers

Drafting of manuscript: Bhatt, Carlson, Deckers

Critical revision: Bhatt, Deckers

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA

    Ankeet S. Bhatt & Peter J. Deckers

  2. University of Connecticut School of Business, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA

    Ankeet S. Bhatt

  3. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Grant W. Carlson

Authors
  1. Ankeet S. Bhatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grant W. Carlson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter J. Deckers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankeet S. Bhatt.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhatt, A.S., Carlson, G.W. & Deckers, P.J. Improving Operating Room Turnover Time: A Systems Based Approach. J Med Syst 38, 148 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0148-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0148-4

Keywords