Abstract
Laboratory results are essential for physicians to diagnose medical conditions. Because of the critical role of medical laboratories, an increasing number of hospitals use total laboratory automation (TLA) to improve laboratory performance. Although the benefits of TLA are well documented, systems occasionally become congested, particularly when hospitals face peak demand. This study optimizes TLA operations. Firstly, value stream mapping (VSM) is used to identify the non-value-added time. Subsequently, batch processing control and parallel scheduling rules are devised and a pull mechanism that comprises a constant work-in-process (CONWIP) is proposed. Simulation optimization is then used to optimize the design parameters and to ensure a small inventory and a shorter average cycle time (CT). For empirical illustration, this approach is applied to a real case. The proposed methodology significantly improves the efficiency of laboratory work and leads to a reduction in patient waiting times and increased service level.










Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pribor, H. C., Expert systems in laboratory medicine: A practical consultative application. J. Med. Syst. 13(2):103–109, 1989.
Graban, M., Lean hospitals: improving quality, patient safety, and employee satisfaction. CRC Press, New York, 2009.
Holland, L. L., Smith, L. L., and Blick, K. E., Total laboratory automation can help eliminate the laboratory as a factor in emergency department length of stay. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 125(5):765–770, 2006.
Emmerich, K. A., Quam, E. F., Bowers, K. L., and Eggert, A. A., The combination of specimen tracking with an advanced AutoLog in a laboratory information system. J. Med. Syst. 22(3):137–145, 1998.
Hawkins, R. C., Laboratory turnaround time. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 28(4):179–194, 2007.
Lam, C. W., and Jacob, E., Implementing a laboratory automation system experience of a large clinical laboratory. J. Lab. Autom. 17(1):16–23, 2012.
Seaberg, R. S., Stallone, R. O., and Statland, B. E., The role of total laboratory automation in a consolidated laboratory network. Clin. Chem. 46(5):751–756, 2000.
Eggert, A. A., Bowers, K. L., Smulka, G. J., Emmerich, K. A., Iwanski, A. L., and Quam, E. F., An overhead specimen handling system for variable workloads. J. Med. Syst. 23(1):1–11, 1999.
Sasaki, M., Kageoka, T., Ogura, K., Kataoka, H., Ueta, T., and Sugihara, S., Total laboratory automation in Japan: Past, present and the future. Clin. Chim. Acta 278(2):217–227, 1998.
Tatsumi, N., Okuda, K., and Tsuda, I., A new direction in automated laboratory testing in Japan: five years of experience with total laboratory automation system management. Clin. Chim. Acta 290(1):93–108, 1999.
Sarkozi, L., Simson, E., and Ramanathan, L., The effects of total laboratory automation on the management of a clinical chemistry laboratory: Retrospective analysis of 36 years. Clin. Chim. Acta 329(1–2):89–94, 2003.
Chien, S.-W., Hsu, Y.-N., Kou, C.-Y., Hunag, K.-H., and Chen, Y.-F., Implementation of a central laboratory with consolidated laboratory network for central Taiwan national hospital union. Proceedings of the 5th World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Electronics, Control and Signal Processing, 181–185, Dallas, Texas, November 1–3, 2006.
Nolan, R. L., Norton, D. P., and Bowen, W. E., Computers and hospital management. J. Med. Syst. 1(2):187–203, 1977.
Melanson, S. E., Lindeman, N. I., and Jarolim, P., Selecting automation for the clinical chemistry laboratory. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 131(7):1063–1069, 2007.
Lian, Y. H., and Van Landeghem, H., Analysing the effects of lean manufacturing using a value stream mapping-based simulation generator. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(13):3037–3058, 2007.
Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T., Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster, New York, 1996.
Rother, M., and Shook, J., Learning to see: value-stream mapping to create value and eliminate muda. Lean Enterprise Institute, Brookline, 1998.
Spearman, M. L., Woodruff, D. L., and Hopp, W. J., CONWIP—A pull alternative to kanban. Int. J. Prod. Res. 28(5):879–894, 1990.
Spearman, M. L., Hopp, W. J., and Woodruff, D. L., A hierarchical control architecture for Constant work-in-process (CONWIP) production systems. J. Manuf. Oper. Manag. 2(3):147–171, 1989.
Huang, M., Wang, D., and Ip, W. H., Simulation study of CONWIP for a cold rolling plant. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 54(3):257–266, 1998.
Gilland, W. G., A simulation study comparing performance of CONWIP and bottleneck-based release rules. Prod. Plan. Control 13(2):211–219, 2002.
Yang, T., Fu, H.-P., and Yang, K.-Y., An evolutionary-simulation approach for the optimization of multi-constant work-in-process strategy—A case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 107(1):104–114, 2007.
Abdulmalek, F. A., and Rajgopal, J., Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: A process sector case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 107(1):223–236, 2007.
Yang, T., and Lu, J.-C., The use of a multiple attribute decision-making method and value stream mapping in solving the pacemaker location problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49(10):2793–2817, 2011.
Lu, J.-C., Yang, T., and Su, C. T., Analysing optimum push/pull junction point location using multiple criteria decision‐making for multistage stochastic production system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50(19):1–15, 2012.
UniCel DxC 600 In-Lab Training Manual, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, 2010. Available at https://www.beckmancoulter.com/ucm/idc/groups/public/documents/webasset/glb_bci_150024.pdf (Accessed 1 June 2007).
Sung, C. S., Kim, Y. H., and Yoon, S. H., A problem reduction and decomposition approach for scheduling for a flowshop of batch processing machines. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 121(1):179–192, 2000.
McKenzie, P., and Jayanthi, S., Ball aerospace explores operational and financial trade-offs in batch sizing in implementing JIT. Interfaces 37(2):108–119, 2007.
Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T., Lean solutions: how companies and customers can create value and wealth together. Free Press, New York, 2005.
Little, J. D., OR FORUM—Little’s Law as viewed on its 50th anniversary. Oper. Res. 59(3):536–549, 2011.
Detty, R. B., and Yingling, J. C., Quantifying benefits of conversion to lean manufacturing with discrete event simulation: A case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38(2):429–445, 2000.
Isken, M. W., and Littig, S. J., Simulation analysis of pneumatic tube systems. J. Med. Syst. 26(1):9–19, 2002.
Banks, J., Carson, J. S., Nelson, B. L., and Nicol, D. M., Discrete-event system simulation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2000.
Kelton, W. D., Sadowski, R. P., and Swets, N. B., Simulation with arena, 5th edition. McGraw Hill Higher Education, New York, 2010.
Zar, J. H., Briostatistical analysis, 5th edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2010.
Yang, T., Hsieh, C.-H., and Cheng, B.-Y., Lean-pull strategy in a re-entrant manufacturing environment: A pilot study for TFT-LCD array manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49(6):1511–1529, 2011.
Wang, T., Chan, F., and Yang, T., 2014. The integration of group technology and simulation optimization to solve the flow shop with highly variable cycle time process: a surgery scheduling case study. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014.
Glover, F., Kelly, J.P., and Laguna, M., New advances and applications of combining simulation and optimization. Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Winter Simulation, 144–152, Coronado, CA, December 8–11, 1996.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the anonymous medical center for providing the case study. This work was partially supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan, Republic of China, under grants NSC-101-2221-E-006 -137 -MY3 and MOST-103-2622-E-006 -025 -CC3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, T., Wang, TK., Li, V.C. et al. The Optimization of Total Laboratory Automation by Simulation of a Pull-Strategy. J Med Syst 39, 162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0162-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0162-6