Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Towards an Encompassing Maturity Model for the Management of Hospital Information Systems

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maturity models are tools that favour the management of organizations, including their information systems management task, and hospital organizations are no exception. In the present paper we put forth a preliminary investigation aimed at the development of an encompassing maturity model for the management of hospital information systems. The development of this model is justified to the extent that current maturity models in the field of hospital information systems management are still in an early development stage, and especially because they are poorly detailed, do not provide tools to determine the maturity stage nor structure the characteristics of maturity stages according to different influencing factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amaral, L., e Varajão, J., Planeamento de Sistemas de Informação, 4th Edition. FCA, 2007.

  2. April, A., Abran, A., and Dumke, R., Assessment of software maintenance capability: A model and its architecture. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR2004). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos CA, pp. 243–248, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auer, T., Beyond IS implemention: A skill-based aproach to IS use. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on Information Systems: Athens, Greece, 1995.

  4. Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., and Pöppelbuß, J., Developing maturity models for IT management. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1(3):213–222, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berztiss, A.T., Capability maturity for knowledge management. In: DEXA Workshop, IEEE Computer Society, 162–166, 2002.

  6. Bhidé, A. V., The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biberoglu, E., and Haddad, H., A survey of industrial experiences with CMM and the teaching of CMM practices. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 18(2):143–152, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brookes, N. & Clark, R., Using maturity models to improve project management practice. POMS 20th Annual Conference, May 1 to May 4, 2009: Orlando Florida USA, 2009.

  9. Burn, J. M. A., Revolutionary staged growth model of information systems planning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 395–406, 1994.

  10. Caralli, R., & Knight, M., Maturity models 101: A primer for applying maturity models to smart grid security, resilience, and interoperability. Software engineering institute: Carnegie Mellon University, 2012.

  11. Damsgaard, J., and Scheepers, R., Managing the crises in intranet implementation: A stage model. Inf. Syst. J. 10(2):131–149, 2000. doi:10.1046/j.1365-75.2000. 00076.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. deBruin, T., & Rosemann, M., Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems: Sydney, Australia, 2005.

  13. Doc (2003), IT Architecture Capability Maturity Model, Department of Commerce, USA Government Introduction, 2003.

  14. Earl, M. J., Management Strategies for Information Technologies. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Earl, M. J., Evolving the EBusiness. Bus. Strateg. Rev. 11(2):33–38, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Freixo, J. & Rocha, Á., QUALITUS: An integrated information architecture for the quality management system of hospitals. In A. Rocha et al. (eds.), New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 353: Sprinder. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_29, 2015.

  17. Galliers, R. D., and Sutherland, A. R., Information systems management and strategy formulation: The ‘stages of growth’ model revisited. J. Inf. Syst. 1(2):89–114, 1991. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.1991.tb00030.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gardler, R., and Mehandjiev, N., Supporting Component-Based Software Evolution. In: Aksit, M., Mezini, M., and Unland, R. (Eds.), Objects, Components, Architectures, Services, and Applications for a Networked World, Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2591. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 103–120, 2003.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Garets, D., and Davis, M., Electronic Medical Records versus Electronic Health Records: Yes, there is a difference. HIMSS Analytics, Chicago, IL, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gonçalves, J., and Rocha, Á., A decision support system for quality of life in head and neck oncology patients. Head Neck Oncol. 4(3):1–9, 2012. doi:10.1186/1758-3284-4-3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gonçalves, J., Silveira, A., and Rocha, Á., A platform to study the quality of life in oncology patients. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Chang. Manag. 5(3):209–220, 2011. doi:10.1504/IJISCM.2011.044501.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holland, C., and Light, B., A stage maturity model for enterprise resource planning systems. Database Adv. Inf. Syst. 32(2):34–45, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Holland, M., Piai, S., and Dunbrack, L. A., Healthcare IT Maturity Model: Western European Hospitals - The Leading Countries (Tech. Rep. No. HI210231). IDC Health Insights, Framingham, MA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  24. NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model. http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/nimm (Retrieved in Set/2014).

  25. Huff, S. L., Munro, M. C., and Martin, B. H., Growth stages of end-user computing. Commun. ACM 31(5):542–550, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kerzner, H., Using the Project Management Maturity Model: Strategic Planning for Project Management, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khandelwal, V. e Ferguson, J., Critical success factors (CSFs) and the growth of IT in selected geographic regions. Proceedings of 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-32), USA, 1999.

  28. King, J., and Kraemer, K., Evolution and organizational information systems: An assessment of Nolan’s stage model. Commun. ACM 27(5):466–475, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. King, W. R., and Teo, T. S. H., Integration between business planning and information systems planning: Validating a stage hypothesis. Decis. Sci. 28(2):279–307, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kohlegger, M., Maier, R. & Thalmann, S., Understanding maturity models results of a structured content analysis proceedings of I-KNOW and I-SEMANTIC 09. School of Management, Information Systems, Austria. Graz, Austria: University of Innsbruck, 2009.

  31. Landeta, J., Current validity of Delphi method in social sciences. Institute of Applied Business Economics of University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain, 2005.

  32. Levin G. & Nutt, H., Achieving excellence in business development: The business development capability maturity model, 2005.

  33. Ludescher, G. & Usrey, M., Towards an ECMM (E-Commerce Maturity Model). In Proceedings of the First International Research Conference on Organizational Excellence in the Third Millennium. Estes Park: Colorado State University, 2000.

  34. Marshall, S. (2007) E-Learning maturity model. http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/ (Retrieved in Set/2014).

  35. Maybury, M.T. (2002), Knowledge Management at the MITRE Corporation. http://www.mitre.org.

  36. McKenney, J. L., and McFarlan, F. W., The information archipelago – maps and bridges. Harv. Bus. Rev. 60(5):109–119, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mettler, T., A Design Science Research Perspective on Maturity Models in Information Systems. University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miaskiewicz, T. and Kozar, K., The use of the delphi method to determine the benefits of the personas method – an approach to systems design. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS: Milwaukee, 50–54, 2006.

  39. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., and Calantone, R. J., Determinants of new product perfomance: A review and meta-analysis. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 11(5):397–417, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Murray, A. (2006), Capability Maturity Models - Using P3M3 to Improve Performance. Vol 2; Issue 0616-01-12. Available: www.outperform.co.uk (Retrieved in Set/2014).

  41. Mutafelija, B., and Stromberg, H., Systematic process improvement using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI. Artech House, Boston, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mutsaers, E., Zee, H., and Giertz, H., The evolution of information technology. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 6(3):115–126, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nascio 2003, NASCIO enterprise architecture maturity model, version 1.3, National association of state chief information officers: December 2003.

  44. NEHTA, NEHTA Interoperability maturity model. 2007 ed. Level 25, 56 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia: National EHealth Transition Authority Ltd, 2007.

  45. Niederman, F., Brancheau, J. C., and Wetherbe, J. C., Information systems management issues for the 1990s. MIS Q. 15(4):475–500, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nolan, R., Managing de computer resource: A stage hypotesis. Commun. ACM 16(7):399–405, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nolan, R., Managing the crisis in data processing. Harv. Bus. Rev. 57(2):115–126, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nolan, R., and Koot, W., Nolan stages theory today: A framework for senior and IT management to manage information technology. Holland Manag. Rev. 31:1–24, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pfeffer, J., and Sutton, R., Knowing “what” to do is not enough: Turning knowledge into action. Calif. Manag. Rev. 42(1):83–108, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Priestman, W., ICT strategy 2007–2011 for the royal liverpool and broadgreen university hospitals nhs trust. Trust Board Meeting 6th November 2007. Document Number: V1.4, 2007.

  51. Renken, J., Developing an IS/ICT manage¬ment capability maturity framework. In: Re¬search conference of the South African Insti¬tute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT). Stellenbosch, 53–62, 2004.

  52. Rocha, Á., and Rocha, B., Adopting nursing health record standards. Inf. Health Soc. Care 39(1):1–14, 2014. doi:10.3109/17538157.2013.827200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rocha, Á., and Vasconcelos, J., Os modelos de maturidade na gestão de sistemas de informação. Rev. Fac. Cienc. Tecnol. Univ. Fernando Pessoa 1:93–107, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rocha, Á., Maturidade da Função Sistema de Informação: Teoria de Estádios, Modelos e Avaliação. Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rocha, Á., Evolution of information systems and technologies maturity in healthcare. Int. J. Healthc. Inf. Syst. Inform. (IJHISI) 6(2):28–36, 2011. doi:10.4018/jhisi.2011040103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Rosemann, M. & deBruin, T., Business process management maturity - a model for progression. In Proceedings of the 13th ECIS, May: Regensburg, 2005.

  57. Santos, L.D.d. (2004), Factores Determinantes do Sucesso de Adopção e Difusão de Serviços de Informação Online em Sistemas de Gestão de Ciência e Tecnologia, Tese de Doutoramento, Departamento de Sistemas de Informação, Universidade do Minho.

  58. Scheele, D.S. (2002), Reality Construction as a Product of Delphi Interaction, in: The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications H.A. Linstone and M. Turoff (eds.), http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/ (Retrieved in Set/2014).

  59. SEI Software Engineering Institute, CMMI® for development, version 1.3, improving processes for developing better products and services, (Tech. Rep. No. CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033): Carnegie Mellon University, 2010.

  60. Sharma, B., Electronic Healthcare Maturity Model (eHMM). Quintegra, Chennai, India, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Venkatesh, V., et al., User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3):425–478, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Webster, J., and Watson, R. T., Analyzing the past and prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26(2):13–23, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wetering, R., and Batenburg, R., A PACS maturity model: A systematic meta-analytic review on maturation and evolvability of PACS in the hospital enterprise. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78:127–140, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Williams, C., Research methods. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 5(3):65–71, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Vidal de Carvalho.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Carvalho, J.V., Rocha, Á. & Vasconcelos, J. Towards an Encompassing Maturity Model for the Management of Hospital Information Systems. J Med Syst 39, 99 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0288-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0288-1

Keywords