Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Simulation-Based Optimization for Surgery Scheduling in Operation Theatre Management Using Response Surface Method

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Operation theatre is one of the most significant assets in a hospital as the greatest source of revenue as well as the largest cost unit. This paper focuses on surgery scheduling optimization, which is one of the most crucial tasks in operation theatre management. A combined scheduling policy composed of three simple scheduling rules is proposed to optimize the performance of scheduling operation theatre. Based on the real-life scenarios, a simulation-based model about surgery scheduling system is built. With two optimization objectives, the response surface method is adopted to search for the optimal weight of simple rules in a combined scheduling policy in the model. Moreover, the weights configuration can be revised to cope with dispatching dynamics according to real-time change at the operation theatre. Finally, performance comparison between the proposed combined scheduling policy and tabu search algorithm indicates that the combined scheduling policy is capable of sequencing surgery appointments more efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Denton, B., Viapiano, J., and Vogl, A., Optimization of surgery sequencing and scheduling decisions under uncertainty. Health Care Manag Sci 10(1):13–24, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guerriero, F., and Guido, R., Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: A survey. Health Care Manag. Sci. 14(1):89–114, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Testi, A., Tànfani, E., and Torre, G., A three-phase approach for operating theatre schedules. Health Care Manag. Sci. 10(2):163–172, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake, J., and Carter, M., A goal programming approach to strategic resource allocation in acute care hospitals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140(3):541–561, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dexter, F., Ledolter, J., and Wachtel, R., Tactical decision making for selective expansion of operating room resources incorporating financial criteria and uncertainty in sub-specialties future workloads. Anesth. Analg. 100(5):1425–1432, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wachtel, R., and Dexter, F., Tactical increases in operating room block time for capacity planning should not be based on utilization. Anesth. Analg. 106(1):215–226, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, B., Murali, P., Dessouky, M., et al., A mixed integer programming approach for allocating operating room capacity. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 60(5):663–673, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beliën, J., Demeulemeester, E., and Cardoen, B., Building cyclic master surgery schedules with levelled resulting bed occupancy: A case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(2):1185–1204, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oostrum, J., Houdenhoven, M., Hurink, J., et al., A master surgical scheduling approach for cyclic scheduling in operating room departments. OR Spectr. 30(2):355–374, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adan, I., Bekkers, J., Dellaert, N., et al., Patient mix optimisation and stochastic resource requirements: A case study in cardiothoracic surgery planning. Health Care Manag. Sci. 12(2):129–141, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Banditori, C., Cappanera, P., and Visintin, F., A combined optimization–simulation approach to the master surgical scheduling problem. IMA J. Manag. Math. 24(2):155–187, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, S., and Wilhelm, W., On capacity allocation for operating rooms. Comput. Oper. Res. 44(1):174–184, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gabel, R., Kulli, J., Stephen Lee, B., et al., Operating room management. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ozkarahan, I., Allocation of surgeries to operating rooms using goal programming. J. Med. Syst. 24(6):339–378, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guinet, A., and Chaabane, S., Operating theatre planning. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 85(1):69–81, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamiri, M., Xie, X., Dolgui, A., and Grimaud, F., A stochastic model for operating room planning with elective and emergency demand for surgery. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185(3):1026–1037, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fei, H., Chu, C., Meskens, N., and Artiba, A., Solving surgical cases assignment problem by a branch-and-price approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 112(1):96–108, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hans, E., Wullink, G., Houdenhoven, M., et al., Robust surgery loading. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185(3):1038–1050, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marques, I., Captivo, M., and Pato, M., An integer programming approach to elective surgery scheduling. OR Spectr. 34(2):407–427, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rizk, C., and Arnaout, J., ACO for the surgical cases assignment problem. J. Med. Syst. 36(3):1191–1199, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beliën, J., and Demeulemeester, E., Building cyclic master surgery schedules with leveled resulting bed occupancy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(2):1185–1204, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu, V. N., de Matta, R., and Lee, C. Y., Scheduling patients in an ambulatory operation theatre. Nav. Res. Logist. 50(3):218–238, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Blake, J. T., Dexter, F., and Donald, J., Operating room manager’s use of integer programming for assigning block time to surgical groups: A case study. Anesth. Analg. 94(1):143–148, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rohleder, T. R., Lewkonia, P., Bischak, D. P., et al., Using simulation modeling to improve patient flow at an outpatient orthopedic clinic. Health Care Manag. Sci. 14(2):135–145, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmed, M. A., and Alkhamis, T. M., Simulation optimization for an emergency department healthcare unit in Kuwait. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 198(3):936–942, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saremi, A., Jula, P., ElMekkawy, T., et al., Appointment scheduling of outpatient surgical services in a multistage operating room department. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 141(2):646–658, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aringhieri, R., Landa, P., Soriano, P., et al., A two level meta heuristic for the operating room scheduling and assignment problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 54(1):21–34, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Choi, S., and Wilhelm, W., An approach to optimize block surgical schedules. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235(1):138–148, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aringhieri, R., Tànfani, E., and Testi, A., Operations research for health care delivery. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(9):2165–2166, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M’Hallah, R., and Al-Roomi, A. H., The planning and scheduling of operating rooms: A simulation approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 78(08):235–248, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Panwalkar, S. S., and Iskander, W., A survey of scheduling rules. Oper. Res. 25(1):45–61, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Box, G. E. P., and Wilson, K. B., On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 13(1):1–45, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was substantially supported by Research Grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (71271122 and 71201087).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300457, China

    Feng Liang & Yuanyuan Guo

  2. Department of System Engineering & Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Richard Y. K. Fung

Authors
  1. Feng Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuanyuan Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Y. K. Fung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Liang.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, F., Guo, Y. & Fung, R.Y.K. Simulation-Based Optimization for Surgery Scheduling in Operation Theatre Management Using Response Surface Method. J Med Syst 39, 159 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0349-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0349-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation