Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automatic Estimation of Osteoporotic Fracture Cases by Using Ensemble Learning Approaches

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ensemble learning methods are one of the most powerful tools for the pattern classification problems. In this paper, the effects of ensemble learning methods and some physical bone densitometry parameters on osteoporotic fracture detection were investigated. Six feature set models were constructed including different physical parameters and they fed into the ensemble classifiers as input features. As ensemble learning techniques, bagging, gradient boosting and random subspace (RSM) were used. Instance based learning (IBk) and random forest (RF) classifiers applied to six feature set models. The patients were classified into three groups such as osteoporosis, osteopenia and control (healthy), using ensemble classifiers. Total classification accuracy and f-measure were also used to evaluate diagnostic performance of the proposed ensemble classification system. The classification accuracy has reached to 98.85 % by the combination of model 6 (five BMD + five T-score values) using RSM-RF classifier. The findings of this paper suggest that the patients will be able to be warned before a bone fracture occurred, by just examining some physical parameters that can easily be measured without invasive operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Özdemir, Z. T., Acar, A., and Karabulut, L., Osteoporosis And Vertebral Fractures In Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Bozok Med. J. 4(1):48–54, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yildirim, P., Ceken, C., Hassanpour, R., Esmelioglu, S., and Tolun, M. R., Mining MEDLINE for the Treatment of Osteoporosis. J. Med. Syst. 36:2339–2347, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iliou, T., Anagnostopoulos, C. N., and Anastassopoulos, G., osteoporosis detection using machine learning techniques and feature selection. Int. J. Artif. Intell. T. 23(05), 9 pages, 2014.

  4. Akgundogdu, A., Jennane, R., Aufort, G., Benhamou, C. L., and Ucan, O. N., 3D image analysis and artificial intelligence for bone disease classification. J. Med. Syst. 34(5):815–828, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Consensus Development Conference: Diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am. J. Med. 94:646–650, 1993.

  6. Ordóñez, C., Matías, J. M., de Cos Juez, C. F., and García, P. J., Machine learning techniques applied to the determination of osteoporosis incidence in post-menopausal women. Math. Comput. Model. 50(5-6):673–679, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lemineur, G., Harba, R., Kilic, N., Ucan, ON., Osman, O., Benhamou, L., Efficient estimation of osteoporosis using artificial neural networks. 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE: Taipei, pp 3039–3044, 2007.

  8. Benhamou, C. L., Poupon, S., Lespessailles, E., Loiseau, S., Jennane, R., Siroux, V., Ohley, W., and Pothuaud, L., Fractal analysis of radiographic trabecular bone texture and bone mineral density: two complementary parameters related to osteoporotic fractures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16:697–704, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tartar, A., Kilic, N., Akan, A., Classification of pulmonary nodules by using hybrid features. Comput. Math. Methods. Med. Article ID 148363, pages 11.

  10. Erdal, H. I., Karakurt, O., and Namli, E., High performance concrete compressive strength forecasting using ensemble models based on discrete wavelet transform. Eng. Appl. Artif. 26(4):1246–1254, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tartar, A., Akan, A., Kilic, N., A novel approach to malignant-benign classification of pulmonary nodules by using ensemble learning classifiers. 36th Annual Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Chicago.

  12. Panwar, S. S., and Raiwani, Y. P., Data reduction techniques to anayze NSL-KDD dataset. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Technol. 5(10):21–31, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sapthagirivasan, V., and Anburajan, M., Diagnosis of osteoporosis by extraction of trabecular features from hip radiographs using support vector machine: An investigation panorama with DXA. Comput. Biol. Med. 43(11):1910–1919, 2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sapthagirivasan, V., Anburajan, M., and Janarthanam, S., Extraction of 3D Femur Neck Trabecular Bone Architecture from Clinical CT Images in Osteoporotic Evaluation: a Novel Framework. J. Med. Syst. 39(8):1–11, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Umadevi, N., Geethalakshmi, S.N., Third International Conference on Computing Communication & Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Coimbatore, pages1–8, 2012.

  16. Chan, Y. T., Miller, P. D., Barret-Conner, E., Weiss, T. W., Sajjan, S. G., and Siris, E. S., An approach for identifying postmenopausal women age 50–64 years of increased short-term risk for osteoporortic fracture. Osteoporos. Int. 18:1287–1296, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, S.K., Yoo, T.K., Kim, D.W., Osteoporosis risk prediction using machine learning and conventional methods. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Osaka, pp. 188–191.

  18. Tay, W. L., Chui, C. K., Ong, S. H., and Ng, A. C. M., Ensemble-based regression analysis of multimodal medical data for osteopenia diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(2):811–819, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Q., Cui, X., Chou, Y. C., Abbod, M. F., Lin, J., and Shieh, J. S., Ensemble artificial neural networks applied to predict the key risk factors of hip bone fracture for elders. Biomed Signal. Process. 21:146–156, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonnick, S.L., Lewis, L.A., Bone densitometry for technologists. Humana Press, 2006.

  21. Blake, G., and Fogelman, M., Interpretation of bone densitometry studies. Semin. Nucl. Med. 27(3):248–260, 1997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cunha, P., Moura, D. C., López, M. A. G., Guerra, C., Pinto, D., and Ramos, I., Impact of Ensemble Learning in the Assessment of Skeletal Maturity. J. Med. Syst. 38(9):1–10, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dietterich, T.G., Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: Proceedings of Conference on Multiple Classifier Systems. 1857, 1–15, 2000.

  24. de Pinho Valente, C.T.M., A tool for text mining in molecular biology domains (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Porto), 2013.

  25. Re, M., Valentini, G., Ensemble methods: a review. Data Mining and Machine Learning for Astronomical Applications, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series, Chapman & Hall, pp 563–594, 2012.

  26. Mert, A., Kilic, N., and Akan, A., Evaluation of bagging ensemble method with time domain feature for diagnosing of arrhythmia beats. Neural. Comput. Applic. 24(2):317–326, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Breiman, L., Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2):123–140, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R. E., A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55(1):119–139, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Niwas, S. I., Lin, W., Bai, X., Kwoh, C. K., Sng, C. C., Aquino, M. C., and Chew, P. T. K., Reliable Feature Selection for Automated Angle Closure Glaucoma Mechanism Detection. J. Med. Syst. 39(3):1–10, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ho, T. K., The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20(8):832–844, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin, B., Instance based learning: nearest neighbour with generalisation. Master of Science Thesis in University of Waikato, New Zealand, 1995.

  32. Aha, D. W., Kibler, D., and Albert, M. K., Instance-based learning algorithms. Mach. Learn. 6(1):37–66, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Breiman, L., Random forests, Tech. Rep., Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 1999.

  34. Breiman, L., Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1):5–32, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hripcsak, G., and Rothschild, A. S., Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12(3):296–298, 2005.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by The Research Fund of Istanbul University. Project Number: UDP-7098 and YADOP-36785. We would like to extend our appreciation to all medical staff who participated in this study for their invaluable support, especially Dr. Sait Sager, MD

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niyazi Kilic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kilic, N., Hosgormez, E. Automatic Estimation of Osteoporotic Fracture Cases by Using Ensemble Learning Approaches. J Med Syst 40, 61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0413-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0413-1

Keywords

Navigation