Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automatic Torso Detection in Images of Preterm Infants

  • Image & Signal Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imaging systems have applications in patient respiratory monitoring but with limited application in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). In this paper we propose an algorithm to automatically detect the torso in an image of a preterm infant during non-invasive respiratory monitoring. The algorithm uses normalised cut to segment each image into clusters, followed by two fuzzy inference systems to detect the nappy and torso. Our dataset comprised overhead images of 16 preterm infants in a NICU, with uncontrolled illumination, and encompassing variations in poses, presence of medical equipment and clutter in the background. The algorithm successfully identified the torso region for 15 of the 16 images, with a high agreement between the detected torso and the torso identified by clinical experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Lee, H., Rusin, C.G., Lake, D.E., et al., A new algorithm for detecting central apnea in neonates. Physiol Meas. 33:1–17, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Fiore, J.M., Poets, C.F., Gauda, E., et al., Cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants: Etiology and monitoring technologies. J Perinatol. 36:165–171, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brand, D., Lau, E., Cameron, J., Wareham, R., Usher-Smith, J., Bridge, P., Lasenby, J., and Iles, R., Tidal breathing parameters measurement by structured light plethysmography (SLP) and spirometry. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care. 181:A2528, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Janssen, R., Wang, W., Moço, A., and de Haan, G., Video-based respiration monitoring with automatic region of interest detection. Physiological Measurement. 37:100–114, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Villarroel, M., Davis, S., Watkinson, P., Guazzi, A., McCormick, K., Tarassenko, L., Jorge, J., Shenvi, A., and Green, G., Continuous non-contact vital sign monitoring in neonatal intensive care unit. Healthc Tech Lett. 1(3):87–91, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Makkapati V, Raman P and Pai G (2016) Camera based Respiration Rate of Neonates by Modelling Movement of Chest and Abdomen Region.11th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM). Bangalore: IEEE:1–5

  7. Wiesner, S., and Yaniv, Z., Monitoring patient respiration using a single optical camera 29th annual Int. Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc:2740–2743, 2007.

  8. Bartula, M., Tigges, T., and Muehlsteff, J., Camera-based system for contactless monitoring of respiration 35th annual Int. Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc:2672–2675, 2013.

  9. Eastwood-Sutherland, C., Gale, T.J., Dargavillc, P.A., and Wheeler, K., Elements of vision based respiratory monitoring. Biomed Eng Int Conf:1–5, 2015.

  10. Shi, J., Leung, T., and Malik, J., Image and video segmentation: The normalized cut framework. Image processing, 1998. ICIP 98. Proceedings. 1998 international conference on image processing. IEEE. 1:943–947, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shi J. (2004). MATLAB Normalized Cuts Segmentation Code. https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~jshi/software/. Accessed 7 Apr. 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J. Gale.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Meharmeet Kaur declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Andrew P. Marshall declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Caillin Eastwood-Sutherland declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Brian P. Salmon declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Peter A. Dargaville declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Timothy J. Gale declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Tasmania Human Research Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Image & Signal Processing

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 18450 kb)

ESM 2

(PNG 412 kb)

ESM 3

(PNG 682 kb)

ESM 4

(PNG 668 kb)

ESM 5

(PNG 595 kb)

ESM 6

(PNG 439 kb)

ESM 7

(PNG 650 kb)

ESM 8

(PNG 442 kb)

ESM 9

(PNG 489 kb)

ESM 10

(PNG 647 kb)

ESM 11

(PNG 477 kb)

ESM 12

(PNG 494 kb)

ESM 13

(PNG 635 kb)

ESM 14

(PNG 602 kb)

ESM 15

(PNG 377 kb)

ESM 16

(PNG 643 kb)

ESM 17

(PNG 670 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, M., Marshall, A.P., Eastwood-Sutherland, C. et al. Automatic Torso Detection in Images of Preterm Infants. J Med Syst 41, 134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0782-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0782-8

Keywords

Navigation