Skip to main content

Pagers, Smartphones, and HIPAA: Finding the Best Solution for Electronic Communication of Protected Health Information

  • Mobile & Wireless Health
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electronic communication is a topic that applies broadly to the professional activities of every physician and the pager has been the gold standard of communication for decades. We believe that this is a dated technology that is holding clinicians back from better, more efficient alternatives, particularly smartphones. In this manuscript, we examine the paradoxical reliance on pagers in academic medicine, at a time when the use of smartphones and text messaging is the subject of intense scrutiny with respect to its standing under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). We provide previously unreported data regarding the electronic communication practices of academic medical centers in the United States, which we obtained through a survey of Designated Institutional Officials. These data highlight both the controversy around text messaging and HIPAA and a puzzling widespread reliance on pagers as an alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dayton, E., and Henriksen, K., Communication failure: Basic components, contributing factors, and the call for structure. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 33(1):34–47, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drolet, B.C., Text messaging and protected health information: What is permitted? JAMA. 317(23):2369–2370, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology DpoHaHS, Health information technology: Initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Interim final rule. Fed. Regist. 75(8):2013–2047, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mobile Devices and Protected Health Information [ https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/october-2017-ocr-cybersecurity-newsletter.pdf]

  5. Clarification: Use of Secure Text Messaging for Patient Care Orders Is Not Acceptable [https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/Clarification_Use_of_Secure_Text_Messaging.pdf]

  6. Update: Texting Orders [https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/Update_Texting_Orders.pdf]

  7. Prochaska, M.T., Bird, A.N., Chadaga, A., and Arora, V.M., Resident use of text messaging for patient care: Ease of use or breach of privacy? JMIR Med. Inform. 3(4):e37, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Departmental funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert E. Freundlich.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

No relevant.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mobile & Wireless Health

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freundlich, R.E., Freundlich, K.L. & Drolet, B.C. Pagers, Smartphones, and HIPAA: Finding the Best Solution for Electronic Communication of Protected Health Information. J Med Syst 42, 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0870-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0870-9

Keywords