Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changing Anesthesia Block Allocations Improves Endoscopy Suite Efficiency

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) has grown and continues to expand as a proportion of all anesthesia practice in the United States [1, 2]. While many management processes have been adapted for NORA from the traditional operating room, it is still unclear what scheduling paradigm will maximize efficiency of resource utilization in this arena. In this study, we investigate the impact of tactical a shift from a shared group to individual, provider-specific block allocations for available anesthesia time in an endoscopy suite for adult patients undergoing elective endoscopy procedures at an academic hospital. Using a retrospective and prospective analysis, we measured elective time-in-block; elective time out-of-block; under-utilized (opportunity and non-opportunity unused) time; over-utilized time; and case tardiness to determine operational efficiency and clinical productivity. Over the study period, the monthly caseload remained constant. Elective time in block increased by 156% (p < 0.0001) and elective time out of block decreased by 38% (p < 0.0001). Opportunity unused time decreased by 28% (p < 0.0001) and productivity increased by 51% (p < 0.0001). Neither over-utilized time nor case tardiness showed a significant change after the intervention. Despite the evidence base supporting traditional approaches to anesthesia block allocation involving group block allocation and non-sequential case scheduling, we have demonstrated an advantage to individual block allocation in a GI endoscopy setting. This sequential case scheduling highlights how tactical decisions in NORA environments may require a rethinking of many practices that anesthesiologists have brought with them from the traditional OR. Using these efficiency and productivity metrics, further adjustments to scheduling practices should be investigated, and connecting these metrics to other systems outcomes, such as financial productivity, is an important next step as NORA services expand into the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagrebetsky, A., Gabriel, R. A., Dutton, R. P., and Urman, R. D., Growth of nonoperating room anesthesia care in the United States: A contemporary trends analysis. Anesth Analg 124(4):1261–1267, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong, T., Tsai, M. H., and Urman, R. D., The expansion of non-operating room anesthesia services. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag 9(October):39–42, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2017.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Awabdy, B., and Wilcox, C. M., Use of anesthesia on the rise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5(1):1–5, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i1.1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhavani, S., Non–Operating Room Anesthesia in the Endoscopy Unit. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 26(3):471–483, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2016.02.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai, M. H., Cipri, L. A., O’Donnell, S. E., Matthew Fisher, J., and Andritsos, D. A., Scheduling non-operating room anesthesia cases in endoscopy: Using the sandbox analogy. J Clin Anesth 40:1–6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Macario, A., Implementing operating room management science: From the bench to the scheduling office. Eur J Anaesthesiol 31(7):355–360, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dexter, F., Macario, A., and Cowen, D. S., Staffing and case scheduling for anesthesia in geographically dispersed locations outside of operating rooms. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19(4):453–458, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aco.0000236149.90988.7f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hudson, M. E., and Lebovitz, E. E., Measuring Clinical Productivity. Anesthesiol Clin 36(2):143–160, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2018.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dexter, F., Xiao, Y., Dow, A. J., Strader, M. M., Ho, D., and Wachtel, R. E., Coordination of appointments for anesthesia care outside of operating rooms using an enterprise-wide scheduling system. Anesth Analg 105(6):1701–1710, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000287686.23187.3f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarraf, E., Breidenstein, M. W., Carlson, R. E., O’Donnell, S. E., and Tsai, M. H., Nonoperating room anesthesia tardiness. Anesth Analg Prac 11(10):285–287, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Houdenhoven, M., Van Oostrum, J. M., Hans, E. W., Wullink, G., and Kazemier, G., Improving operating room efficiency by applying bin-packing and portfolio techniques to surgical case scheduling. Anesth Analg 105(3):707–714, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000277492.90805.0f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shi, P., Dexter, F., and Epstein, R. H., Comparing policies for case scheduling within 1 day of surgery by Markov chain models. Anesth Analg 122(2):526–538, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carey, R. G., Constructing powerful control charts. J Ambul Care Manage 25(4):64–70, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004479-200210000-00010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carey, R. G., How do you know that your care is improving? Part I: Basic concepts in statistical thinking. J Ambul Care Manage 25(1):80–87, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004479-200201000-00011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carey RG. How Do You Know That Your Care Is Improving? Part II: Using Control Charts To Learn from Your Data. J Ambul Care Manage. 2002;25(1): 80-87. papers2://publication/uuid/69EEDE90-F29F-41D2-89BA-04DE346B35BA.

  16. Dexter, F., and Wachtel, R. E., Scheduling for anesthesia at geographic locations remote from the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 27(4):426–430, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perrow, C., Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies-Updated edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Mubarak F, Khumawala, BM, Canel, C. Focused cellular manufacturing: an alternative to cellular manufacturing. Int J Operations Production Manage 2003; 23(3): 277-299. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01443

  19. Rathmell, J. P., and Sandberg, W. S., Anesthesiologists and health care redesign: Time to team up with the experts. Anesthesiology 125(4):618–621, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, A., Sanford, J. A., Tsai, M. H., O’Donnell, S. E., Tran, B. K., and Urman, R. D., Analysis to establish differences in efficiency metrics between operating room and non-operating room anesthesia cases. J Med Syst 1(8):4–9, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0765-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA

    Mitchell H. Tsai

  2. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation (by courtesy), University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA

    Mitchell H. Tsai

  3. Department of Surgery (by courtesy), University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA

    Mitchell H. Tsai

  4. Anesthesia Services, P.A., Department of Anesthesiology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA

    Michael A. Hall

  5. Green Mountain Surgery Center, Colchester, VT, USA

    Melanie S. Cardinal

  6. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT, USA

    Max W. Breidenstein

  7. Department of Nursing, University of Vermont College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Burlington, VT, USA

    Michael J. Abajian

  8. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA

    Richard S. Zubarik

Authors
  1. Mitchell H. Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael A. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melanie S. Cardinal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Max W. Breidenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael J. Abajian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Richard S. Zubarik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mitchell H. Tsai, MD, MMM, helped design the study, collect the data, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Michael A. Hall, MD, helped design the study, collect the data, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Melanie S. Cardinal, MSN, CGRN, helped design the study, conduct the study, collect the data, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Max W. Breidenstein helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Michael J. Abajian, MD, MPH, helped design the study, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript. Richard S. Zubarik, MD, helped design the study, conduct the study, analyze the data, and prepare the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell H. Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Mitchell H. Tsai, MD, MMM, declares no conflict of interest. Michael A. Hall, MD declares no conflict of interest. Melanie S. Cardinal, MSN, CGRN, declares no conflict of interest. Max W. Breidenstein declares no conflict of interest. Michael J. Abajian, MD, MPH, declares no conflict of interest. Richard S. Zubarik, MD, declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Previous Presentation:

Hall MA, Cardinal MS, Breidenstein MW, Abajian MJ, Zubarik RS, Tsai MH. Single provider block time improves utilization and productivity in the endoscopy suite. Digestive Disease Week, San Diego, CA, May 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, M.H., Hall, M.A., Cardinal, M.S. et al. Changing Anesthesia Block Allocations Improves Endoscopy Suite Efficiency. J Med Syst 44, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1451-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1451-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation