Skip to main content
Log in

An Environmental Scan of Anesthesia Information Management Systems in the American and Canadian Marketplace

  • Education & Training
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anesthesia Information Management Systems are specialized forms of electronic medical records used by anesthesiologists to automatically and reliably collect, store, and present perioperative patient data. There are no recent academic publications that outline the names and features of AIMS in the current American and Canadian marketplace. An environmental scan was performed to first identify existing AIMS in this marketplace, and then describe and compare these AIMS. We found 13 commercially available AIMS but were able to describe in detail the features and functionalities of only 10 of these systems, as three vendors did not participate in the study. While all AIMS have certain key features, other features and functionalities are only offered by some of the AIMS. Features less commonly offered included patient portals for pre-operative questionnaires, clinical decision support systems, and voice-to-text capability for documentation. The findings of this study can inform AIMS procurement efforts by enabling anesthesia departments to compare features across AIMS and find an AIMS whose features best fit their needs and priorities. Future studies are needed to describe the features and functionalities of these AIMS at a more granular level, and also assess the usability and costs of these systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Available upon request.

References

  1. J. A. Gálvez, B. S. Rothman, C. A. Doyle, S. Morgan, A. F. Simpao, and M. A. Rehman, “A Narrative Review of Meaningful Use and Anesthesia Information Management Systems,” Anesth. Analg., vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 693–706, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. J. Shah and K. K. Tremper, “Anatomy of an Anesthesia Information Management System,” Anesthesiol. Clin., vol. 29, pp. 355–365, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. F. Simpao and M. A. Rehman, “Anesthesia Information Management Systems,” Anesth. Analg., vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 90–94, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. F. Simpao and J. M. Ehrenfeld, “Monitoring Technologies in Acute Care Environments,” Monit. Technol. Acute Care Environ., pp. 391–397, 2014.

  5. B. Kadry, W. W. Feaster, A. Macario, and J. M. Ehrenfeld, “Anesthesia Information Management Systems : Past , Present , and Future of Anesthesia Records,” Mt. Sinai J. Med., pp. 154–165, 2012.

  6. R. H. Epstein, F. Dexter, and N. Patel, “Influencing Anesthesia Provider Behavior Using Anesthesia Information Management System Data for Near Real-Time Alerts and Post Hoc Reports,” Anesth. Analg., vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 678–692, 2015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Ehrenfeld and M. A. Rehman, “AIMS: A Review of Functionality & Installation Considerations,” J Clin Monit Comput, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. M. Vigoda and D. M. Feinstein, “Anesthesia Information Management Systems,” Adv. Anesth., vol. 26, pp. 121–136, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. I. S. Stol, J. M. Ehrenfeld, and R. H. Epstein, “Technology Diffusion of Anesthesia Information Management Systems into Academic Anesthesia Departments in the United States,” Anesth Analg, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 644–650, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Kazemi, F. Lau, A. F. Simpao, R. J. Williams, and C. Matava, “The state of adoption of anesthesia information management systems in Canadian academic anesthesia departments: a survey,” Can. J. Anesth., 2021.

  11. B. G. Nair, E. Gabel, and M. Cannesson, “Intraoperative Clinical Decision Support for Anesthesia: A Narrative Review of Available Systems,” Anesth. Analg., vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 603–617, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. F. Simpao, J. M. Tan, A. M. Lingappan, J. A. Galvez, S. E. Morgan, and M. A. Krall, “A systematic review of near real-time and point-of-care clinical decision support in anesthesia information management systems,” J. Clin. Monit. Comput., pp. 885–894, 2017.

  13. J. Stonemetz, “Anesthesia Information Management Systems Market place and Current Vendors,” Anesthesiol. Clin., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 367–375, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Graham, T. Evitts, and R. Thomas-MacLean, “Environmental scans: How useful are they for primary care research?,” Can. Fam. Physician, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1022–1023, 2008.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Conway, “Environmental scanning: What it is and how to do it...,” p. 30, 2009.

  16. DuckDuckGo, “About DuckDuckGo.” [Online]. Available: https://duckduckgo.com/about. [Accessed: 21-Sep-2021].

  17. S. Hollingsworth, “DuckDuckGo vs. Google: An In-Depth Search Engine Comparison.” [Online]. Available: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-vs-duckduckgo/301997/#close. [Accessed: 21-Sep-2021].

  18. HIMSS, “Interoperability in Healthcare.” [Online]. Available: https://www.himss.org/resources/interoperability-healthcare. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2020].

  19. T. Otte-trojel, A. De Bont, T. G. Rundall, and J. Van De Klundert, “What do we know about developing patient portals ? a systematic literature review,” J Am Med Inf. Assoc, no. April 2015, pp. 162–168, 2016.

  20. D. W. Bates et al., “Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality.,” J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 523–30, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Kawamoto, C. A. Houlihan, A. Balas, and D. F. Lobach, “Information in practice Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success.”

  22. R. E. Freundlich and J. M. Ehrenfeld, “Anesthesia Information Management: Clinical Decision Support,” Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 705–709, Dec. 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. P. Wanderer and J. M. Ehrenfeld, “Clinical Decision Support for Perioperative Information Management Systems,” Semin. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth., 2013.

  24. O. Ali, A. Shrestha, J. Soar, and S. F. Wamba, “Cloud computing-enabled healthcare opportunities, issues, and applications: A systematic review,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 43, Dec. 2018.

  25. Y. A. Kumah-Crystal, C. J. Pirtle, H. M. Whyte, E. S. Goode, S. H. Anders, and C. U. Lehmann, “Electronic Health Record Interactions through Voice: A Review,” Appl Clin Inf., vol. 9, pp. 541–552, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. A. Hashimoto, E. Witkowski, L. Gao, O. Meireles, and G. Rosman, “Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: Current techniques, clinical applications, and limitations,” Anesthesiology, no. 2, pp. 379–394, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. KLAS, “Anesthesia 2016: A Clinician Take on Anesthesia Information a Clinician Take on Anesthesia Information,” 2016.

  28. Plexus Technology Group, “About Us | Electronic Anesthesia Documentation | Plexus TG.” [Online]. Available: https://www.plexustg.com/about-us. [Accessed: 27-Sep-2020].

  29. Cerner, “Cerner 2019 Annual Report,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://investors.cerner.com/static-files/b9be7606-0545-4649-be7d-8dac385d9395. [Accessed: 24-Sep-2020].

  30. C. Tate and P. Warburton, “US Hospital EMR Market Share 2020 Shifting Perspectives Among Large and Small Hospitals - KLAS Report,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://klasresearch.com/report/us-hospital-emr-market-share-2020/1616.

  31. Dräger, “About Dräger.” [Online]. Available: https://www.draeger.com/en_corp/About-Draeger. [Accessed: 15-Sep-2020].

  32. Dräger, “Anesthesia Machines – Innovative Anesthesia Workstations | Draeger.” [Online]. Available: https://www.draeger.com/en-us_us/Hospital/Anesthesia-Machines. [Accessed: 15-Sep-2020].

  33. Epic, “About Us | Epic.” [Online]. Available: https://www.epic.com/about. [Accessed: 15-Sep-2020].

  34. Surgical Information Systems, “About Surgical Information Systems - Medical Management Solutions.” [Online]. Available: https://www.sisfirst.com/sis-about. [Accessed: 22-Sep-2020].

  35. J. Hess, “2017 Best in KLAS Awards Software and Services - KLAS Report.” [Online]. Available: https://klasresearch.com/report/2017-best-in-klas-awards-software-and-services/1173. [Accessed: 17-Sep-2020].

  36. Picis, “What is Picis? Leading Clinical Information Solutions Company.” [Online]. Available: https://www.picis.com/about/. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2020].

  37. Spectrum Medical, “Company Profile & History.” [Online]. Available: https://www.spectrummedical.com/company/about-us/company-profile-and-history.aspx. [Accessed: 19-Sep-2020].

  38. Surgical Information Systems, “SIS Ranks as #1 ASC EHR Vendor by Black Book for 5th Year.” [Online]. Available: https://blog.sisfirst.com/sis-ranks-as-1-asc-ehr-vendor-by-black-book-for-5th-year#B1. [Accessed: 22-Sep-2020].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Pooya Kazemi and Francis Lau contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection was performed by Pooya Kazemi. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Pooya Kazemi and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pooya Kazemi.

Ethics declarations

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Ethics approval was obtained in May 2019 from the University of Victoria Human Research Ethics Board prior to commencement of the study. Copy of the Certificate of Ethical Approval available upon request.

Informed consent

All AIMS vendors were provided with a study information letter that also served as implied consent.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Education & Training

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Features of the AneScan AIMS
Table 6 Features of the Cerner AIMS
Table 7 Features of the Drager AIMS
Table 8 Features of the Epic AIMS
Table 9 Features of the General Electric AIMS
Table 10 Features of the iProcedures AIMS
Table 11 Features of the Picis AIMS
Table 12 Features of the Recordation AIMS
Table 13 Features of the Spectrum AIMS
Table 14 Features of the Talis AIMS
Table 15 Description of vendors that did not participate in the study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazemi, P., Lau, F., Matava, C. et al. An Environmental Scan of Anesthesia Information Management Systems in the American and Canadian Marketplace. J Med Syst 45, 101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01781-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01781-0

Keywords

Navigation