Skip to main content
Log in

Shape Matters: A Neglected Feature of Medication Safety

Why Regulating the Shape of Medication Containers Can Improve Medication Safety

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to highlight how to reduce medication errors through the implementation of human factors science to the design features of medication containers. Despite efforts to employ automation for increased safety and decreased workload, medication administration in hospital wards is still heavily dependent on human operators (pharmacists, nurses, physicians, etc.). Improving this multi-step process requires its being studied and designed as an interface in a complex socio-technical system. Human factors engineering, also known as ergonomics, involves designing socio-technical systems to improve overall system performance, and reduces the risk of system, and in particular, operator, failures. The incorporation of human factors principles into the design of the work environment and tools that are in use during medication administration could improve this process. During periods of high workload, the cognitive effort necessary to work through a very demanding process may overwhelm even expert operators. In such conditions, the entire system should facilitate the human operator’s high level of performance. Regarding medications, clinicians should be provided with as many perceptual cues as possible to facilitate medication identification. Neglecting the shape of the container as one of the features that differentiates between classes of medications is a lost opportunity to use a helpful characteristic, and medication administration failures that happen in the absence of such intentional design arise from “designer error” rather than “user error”. Guidelines that define a container’s shape for each class of medication would compel pharmaceutical manufacturers to be compatible and would eliminate the confusion that arises when a hospital changes the supplier of a given medication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

“Not applicable”.

References

  1. Safren, M. A., & Chapanis, A. (1960). A critical incident study of hospital medication errors. Part I. Hospitals. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196101030-00073

  2. Raban, M. Z., & Westbrook, J. I. (2014). Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective ?: a systematic review. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23, 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiff, G., Amato, M. G., Eguale, T., Boehne, J. J., Wright, A., Koppel, R., … Seger, A. C. (2015). Computerised physician order entry-related medication errors: Analysis of reported errors and vulnerability testing of current systems. BMJ Quality and Safety, 24(4), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nunnally, M., Nemeth, C. P., Brunetti, V., & Cook, R. I. (2004). Lost in menuspace: User interactions with complex medical devices. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans., 34(6), 736–742. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2004.836780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu, K.-Y., Delaurentis, P., Bitan, Y., Degnan, D. D., & Yih, Y. (2019). Unintended Patient Safety Risks Due to Wireless Smart Infusion Pump Library Update Delays. Journal of Patient Safety, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000562

  6. Cook, R., & Woods, D. (1994). Operating at the sharp end: the complexity of human error. In S. Bogner (Ed.), Human Error in Medicine (pp. 255–310). CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holden, R. J., Abebe, E., Russ-Jara, A. L., & Chui, M. A. (2021). Human factors and ergonomics methods for pharmacy research and clinical practice. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(12), 2019–2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Donchin, Y., & Gopher, D. (2013). Around the patient bed: human factors and safety in health care. (Y. Donchin & D. Gopher, Eds.). CRC Press.

  9. Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic Evaluation of user interfaces. CHI ’90 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (April), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281

  10. Bitan, Y. (2020). Design for emergencies. In A. Sethumadhavan & F. Sasangohar (Eds.), Design for Health (pp. 147–160). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816427-3.00008-7

  11. Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reason, J. (1995). Understanding adverse events: human factors. Quality in Health Care, 4(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.4.2.80

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reason, J. T. (1992). Cognitive Underspecification. In Experimental slips and human error (pp. 71–91). Springer, Boston, MA.

  14. Grout, J. R. (2006). Mistake proofing: Changing designs to reduce error. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(SUPPL. 1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.016030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ashcroft, D. M., Quinlan, P., & Blenkinsopp, A. (2005). Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmacies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 14(5), 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berman, A. (2004). Reducing medication errors through naming, labeling, and packaging. Journal of Medical Systems, 28(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:joms.0000021518.60670.10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Porat, N., Bitan, Y., Shefi, D., Donchin, Y., & Rozenbaum, H. (2009). Use of colour-coded labels for intravenous high-risk medications and lines to improve patient safety. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 18(6), 505–509. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.025726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baba, R., & Ravalia, a S. (2004). International Colour Coding for syringe drug labels: a survey. Anaesthesia, 59(10), 1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03952.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Larmené-Beld, K. H. M., Alting, E. K., & Taxis, K. (2018). A systematic literature review on strategies to avoid look-alike errors of labels. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2471-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Irwin, A., Mearns, K., Watson, M., & Urquhart, J. (2013). The Effect of Proximity, Tall Man Lettering, and Time Pressure on Accurate Visual Perception of Drug Names. Human Factors, 55(2), 253–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 829–841. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03196438.pdf

  23. Chapanis, A. (1999). The Chapanis chronicles: 50 years of human factors research, education and design. Aegean Publishing Company.

  24. Ostini, R., Roughead, E. E., Kirkpatrick, C. M. J., Monteith, G. R., & Tett, S. E. (2012). Quality Use of Medicines - Medication safety issues in naming; Look-alike, sound-alike medicine names. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 20(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00210.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Subrahmanyam, M., & Mohan, S. (2013). Safety features in anaesthesia machine. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 57(5), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.120143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Da Rocha, B. S., Moraes, C. G., Okumura, L. M., Da Cruz, F., Sirtori, L., & Da Silva Pons, E. (2021). Interventions to reduce problems related to the readability and comprehensibility of drug packages and labels: A systematic review. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(8), E1494–E1506. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. European Commission. (2009). Europen commission entrprise and industry directorate general consumer goods pharmaceutical guidline on the readability of the labeliing and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-2/c/2009_01_12_readability_guideline_final_en.pdf

  28. FDA. (2022). Safety Considerations for Container Labels and Carton Labeling Design to Minimize Medication Errors.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y. Bitan and M. E. Nunnally developed the idea and wrote the manuscript together.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuval Bitan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This paper is not based on new data and therefore ethical approval was not required.

Competing interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bitan, Y., Nunnally, M.E. Shape Matters: A Neglected Feature of Medication Safety. J Med Syst 47, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01905-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01905-0

Keywords

Navigation