Skip to main content
Log in

Definition and Performance Evaluation of Network Services Deployed Over a Differentiated Services Network

  • Published:
Journal of Network and Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A vital requirement for next generation IP networks is the provision of services with differentiated behavior and characteristics. The basic reason for that is the need to provide Quality of Service (QoS) to the different types of user traffic produced by applications that are different in nature and behavior, analogously to the IP network services. The Differentiated Services (DiffServ) paradigm is still one of the major outcomes of the research community toward the provision of QoS to individual customer needs and applications. This paper addresses the definition and deployment of specific network services in a DiffServ environment. We reuse and extend the fundamental concepts of the Expedited Forwarding and Assured Forwarding per hop behaviors in order to define four new network services, apart from the well known Best Effort one, which introduce a specific traffic handling implementation along with an Admission Control methodology. These are analyzed and simulated in the paper in order to evaluate their performance and confirm the correctness of their fundamental principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker, Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview, IETF RFC 1633, June 1994.

  2. R. Braden, L. Zhang, S. Berson, S. Herzog, and S. Jamin, Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP), IETF RFC 2205, September 1997.

  3. S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss, An Architecture for Differentiated Services, IETF RFC 2475, December 1998.

  4. K. Nichols and L. Zhang, A Two-bit Differentiated Services Architecture for the Internet, IETF RFC 2638, July 1999.

  5. V. Jacobson, K. Nichols, and K. Poduri, An Expedited Forwarding PHB, IETF RFC 2598, June 1999.

  6. J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss, and J. Wroclawski, Assured Forwarding PHB Group, IETF RFC 2597, June 1999.

  7. S. Floyd and K. Fall, Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the Internet, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 458–472, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Pieda, N. Seddigh, and B. Nandy, Dynamics of TCP and UDP Interaction in IP-QoS Differentiated Services Networks, In 3rd Canadian Conference on Broadband Research, Ottawa, Canada, November 1999.

  9. B. Nandy, N. Seddigh, P. Pieda, and N. Ethridge, Intelligent Traffic Conditioners for Assured Forwarding Based Differentiated Services Networks, IFIP High Performance Networking (HPN 2000), Paris, June 2000.

  10. S. Yilmaz and I. Matta, On Class-based Isolation of UDP, Short-lived and Long-lived TCP Flows, In Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium in Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS’01), Cincinnati; Ohio, USA, August 2001.

  11. M. Bauer and H. Akhand, Managing quality-of-service in Internet applications using differentiated services, Journal of Network and Systems Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2002.

  12. M. Bauer and H. Akhand, Managing quality of service in Internet applications using differentiated services, Journal of Network and Systems Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2002

  13. Deliverable D1302, Specification of Traffic Handling for the Second Trial, AQUILA project consortium.

  14. M. Allman, V. Paxson, and W. Stevens, TCP Congestion Control, IETF RFC 2581, April 1999.

  15. R. Guerin and V. Peris, Quality-of-service in packet networks: Basic mechanisms and directions, Computers Networks, Vol. 31, No. 3, February 1999.

  16. A. Demers, S. Keshav, and S. Shenker, Analysis and simulation of a fair queuing algorithm, Journal of Interworking Research and Experience, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3–26, September, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Markaki, E. Nikolouzou, and I. Venieris, Performance Evaluation of Scheduling Algorithms for the Internet, In 8th IFIP Conference on Performance Modeling and Evaluation of ATM & IP Networks, Ilkley, West Yorkshire, U.K., June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Bennetti and H. Zhang, Hierarchical Packet Fair Queuing Algorithms, In Proceedings of SIGCOMM 1996, Stanford, CA, USA, August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. Firoiu and M. Borden, A Study of Active Queue Management for Congestion Control, In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom), Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Ziegler, C. Brandauer, and S. Fdida, A Quantitative Model for Parameter Setting of RED With TCP Traffic, In 9th International Workshop on Quality of Service, Karlsruhe, Germany, June 6–8, 2001.

  21. F. Brichet, L. Massoulie, and J. W. Roberts, Stochastic Ordering and the Notion of Negligible CDV, In Proceedings of 15th International Teletraffic Congress, Washington, DC, June 1997.

  22. Final Report COST 257, Impact of New Services on the Architecture and Performance of Broadband Networks (COST 257 Management Committee, Phuoc Tran-Gia, Norbert Vicari eds.), ISBN-Nr. 3-930111-10-1, compuTEAM, Wuerzburg, Germany, 2000.

  23. J. W. Roberts, U. Mocci, and J. Virtamo, eds., Broadband Network TeletrafficFinal Report of Action COST 242, vol. 1155 of LNCS. Springer, 1996.

  24. K. Lindberger, Dimensioning and Design Methods for Integrated ATM Networks, In Proceedings of 14th International Teletraffic Congress, Antibes, Juan-Ies-Pins, France, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Elwalid, D. Mitra, and R. H. Wentworth, A new approach for allocating buffers and bandwidth to heterogeneous regulated traffic in an ATM node, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1995, pp. 1115–1127.

  26. E. Tsolakou, E. Nikolouzou, and I. S. Venieris, A Study of QoS Performance for Real Time Applications over a Differentiated Services Network, In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC’02), Taormina, Italy, July 2002.

  27. K. Fall and S. Floyd, Simulation-based Comparisons of Tahoe, Reno, and SACK TCP, Computer Communication Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 5–21, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. I. Matta and L. Guo, Differentiated Predictive Fair Service for TCP Flows, In Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP’2000), Osaka, Japan, October 2000.

  29. T. Bonald, M. May, and J. Bolot, Analytic Evaluation of RED Performance, IEEE/INFOCOM’2000, Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. Malouch and Z. Liu, Performance Analysis of TCP With WRED Routers, IEEE GlobeCom 2002, Taipei Taiwan, November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Floyd and V. Jacobson, Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 1, No. 4, August 1993.

  32. AQUILA IST Project Web Page, Available at URL: http://www.ist-aquila.org/

  33. Deliverable D3201, First Trial Report, AQUILA project consortium.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugenia Nikolouzou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsolakou, E., Nikolouzou, E., Maniatis, S. et al. Definition and Performance Evaluation of Network Services Deployed Over a Differentiated Services Network. J Netw Syst Manage 12, 537–565 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-004-0675-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-004-0675-2

Navigation