Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic Tools for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Network and Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The availability of tools to diagnose Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) failures is a key success factor for this type of networks as already demonstrated by several long-running deployments. By nature, WSNs are resource-constrained, fragile, complex to analyse, and failure-prone. Naturally, with the growing number of installations, it is becoming fundamental to efficiently diagnose failures as soon as possible, in order to deal with the underlying causes. In accordance with this, from 2005 onwards, the offer of diagnostic tools has been increasing, as the other base technologies (e.g. networking, operating system, localisation, synchronisation) become reasonably stable. The purpose of this survey is to provide an overview of existing post-deployment WSN diagnostic tools, by briefly presenting their functionality, architecture and constraints, in order to enable a basic understating of each tool. The survey also includes a multi-dimensional comparative analysis of the various tools, based on a proposed classification scheme and evaluation criteria, as well as an identification of the main open research issues. Although the number of diagnostic tools is high and considerable work has been done in this area, we conclude that there are still several challenges concerning post-deployment WSN diagnostic tools, regarding scope, flexibility, generality, mobility and security. Moreover, there is a need for mature, native diagnostic-oriented functionality in WSN platforms and operating systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dutta, P., Hui, J., Jeong, J., Kim, S., Sharp, C., Taneja, J., Tolle, G., Whitehouse, K., Culler, D.: Trio: enabling sustainable and scalable outdoor wireless sensor network deployments. In: Proceedings of the IPSN/SPOTS (2006). doi:10.1109/IPSN.2006.243880

  2. Lee, W.L., Datta, A., Cardell-Oliver, R.: Network management in wireless sensor networks. In: Denko, M.K., Yang, L.T. (eds.) Handbook on Mobile Ad Hoc and Pervasive Communications, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012). ISBN: 1439846162 (to appear)

  3. Ni, K., Ramanathan, N., Chehade, M., Balzano, L., Nair, S., Zahedi, S., Kohler, E., Pottie, G., Hansen, M., Srivastava, M.: Sensor network data fault types. TOSN 5(3), 1–29 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, Y., Meratnia, N., Havinga, P.: Outlier Detection Techniques for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. Technical Report TR-CTIT-08-59, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology University of Twente, Enschede (2007). ISSN 1381-3625

  5. Zhang, R., Zilic, Z., Radecka, K.: Energy-efficient software-based self-test for wireless sensor network nodes. In: Proceedings of the VTS (2006). doi:10.1109/VTS.2006.32

  6. Harte, S., Rahman, A., Razeeb, K.: Fault tolerance in sensor networks using self-diagnosing sensor nodes. In: Proceedings of in IEE Seminar on Intelligent Building Environments (2005). doi:10.1049/ic:20050211

  7. Rajasegarar, S., Leckie, C., Palansiwami, M.: Anomaly detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 15(4), 34–40 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levis, P., Lee, N., Welsh, M., Culler, D.: TOSSIM: accurate and scalable simulation of entire tiny OS applications. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2003). doi:10.1145/958491.958506

  9. Osterlind, F., Dunkels, A., Eriksson, J., Finne, N., Voigt, T.: Cross-level sensor network simulation with COOJA. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (2006). doi:10.1109/LCN.2006.322172

  10. Sasnauskas, R., Landsiedel, O., Alizai, M., Weise, C., Kowalewski, S., Wehrle, K.: KleeNet: discovering insidious interaction bugs in wireless sensor networks before deployment. In: Proceedings of the IPSN (2010). doi:10.1145/1791212.1791235

  11. Li, P., Regehr, J.: T-Check: bug finding for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IPSN (2010). doi:10.1145/1791212.1791234

  12. AVR JTAG ICE: User guide. http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc2475.pdf (2001). Accessed 16 December 2010

  13. MSP430 Hardware Tools User’s Guide. http://focus.ti.com/lit/ug/slau278e/slau278e.pdf (2010). Accessed 16 December 2010

  14. Eriksson, J., Dunkels, A., Finne, N., Österlind, F., Voigt, T.: MSPSim—an extensible simulator for MSP430-equipped sensor boards. In: Proceedings of the EWSN (2007) (poster/demo session)

  15. Girod, L., Stathopoulos, T., Ramanathan, N., Elson, J., Estrin, D., Osterweil, E., Schoellhammer, T.: A system for simulation, emulation, and deployment of heterogeneous sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2004). doi:10.1145/1031495.1031519

  16. Titzer, B., Lee, D., Palsberg, J.: Avrora: scalable sensor network simulation with precise timing. In: Proceedings of the IPSN (2005). doi:10.1109/IPSN.2005.1440978

  17. Eriksson, J., Österlind, F., Finne, N., Tsiftes, N., Dunkels, A., Voigt, T., Sauter, R., Marrón, P.: COOJA/MSPSim: interoperability testing for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the SIMUTools (2009). doi:10.4108/ICST.SIMUTOOLS2009.5637

  18. Werner-Allen, G., Swieskowski, P., Welsh, M.: MoteLab: a wireless sensor network testbed. In: Proceedings of the IPSN (2005). doi:10.1109/IPSN.2005.1440979

  19. Ertin, E., Arora, A., Ramnath, R., Naik, V., Bapat, S., Kulathumani, V., Sridharan, M., Zhang, H., Cao, H., Nesterenko, M.: Kansei: a testbed for sensing at scale. In: Proceedings of the IPSN (2006). doi:10.1145/1127777.1127838

  20. Doddavenkatappa, M., Chan, M., Ananda, L.: Indriya: a low cost, 3D wireless sensor network testbed. http://indriya.comp.nus.edu.sg/motelab/html/testbed.pdf (2010). Accessed 16 December 2010

  21. Handziski, V., Köpke, A., Willig, A., Wolisz, A.: TWIST: a scalable and reconfigurable testbed for wireless indoor experiments with sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the REALMAN (2006). doi:10.1145/1132983.1132995

  22. Tavakoli, A.: Wringer: A Debugging and Monitoring Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks. Doctoral Colloquium. SenSys (2007)

  23. Chen, B., Peterson, G., Mainland, G., Welsh, M.: LiveNet: using passive monitoring to reconstruct sensor network dynamics. In: Proceedings of the DCOSS (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69170-9_6

  24. Shea, R., Cho, Y., Srivastava, M.: LIS is More: Improved Diagnostic Logging in Sensor Networks with Log Instrumentation Specifications. TR-UCLA-NESL-200906-01 (2009)

  25. Sundaram, V., Eugster, P., Zhang, X.: Lightweight tracing for wireless sensor networks debugging. In: Proceedings of the MidSens (2009). doi:10.1145/1658192.1658195

  26. Cooprider, N., Archer, W., Eide, E., Gay, D., Regehr, J.: Efficient memory safety for TinyOS. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2007). doi:10.1145/1322263.1322283

  27. Archer, W., Levis, P., Regehr, J.: Interface contracts for TinyOS. In: Proceedings of the IPSN (2007). doi:10.1145/1236360.1236382

  28. Ramanathan, N., Chang, K., Kapur, R., Girod, L., Kohler, E., Estrin, D.: Sympathy for the sensor network debugger. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2005). doi:10.1145/1098918.1098946

  29. Ringwald, M., Römer, K., Vitaletti, A.: SNIF: Sensor Network Inspection Framework. Technical report no. 535, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich (2006)

  30. Ringwald, M., Romer, K.: SNIF: a comprehensive tool for passive inspection of sensor networks. http://www.vs.inf.ethz.ch/publ/papers/mringwal-snif-kuvs.pdf (2007). Accessed 16 December 2010

  31. Khan, M., Luo, L., Huang, C., Abdelzaher, T.: SNTS: sensor network troubleshooting suite. In: Proceedings of the DCOSS (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73090-3_10

  32. Abdelzaher, T., Blum, B., Cao, Q., Chen, Y., Evans, D., George, J., George, S., Gu, L., He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., Luo, L., Son, S., Stankovic, J., Stoleru, R., Wood, A.: EnviroTrack: towards an environmental computing paradigm for distributed sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the ICDCS (2004). doi:10.1109/ICDCS.2004.1281625

  33. Tolle, G., Culler, D.: Design of an application-cooperative management system for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the EWSN (2005). doi:10.1109/EWSN.2005.1462004

  34. Luo, L., He, T., Zhou, G., Gu, L., Abdelzaher, T., Stankovic, J.: Achieving repeatability of asynchronous events in wireless sensor networks with Envirolog. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM (2006). doi: 10.1109/INFOCOM.2006.114

  35. Cao, Q., Abdelzaher, T., Stankovic, J., Whitehouse, K., Luo, L.: Declarative tracepoints: a programmable and application independent debugging system for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2008). doi:10.1145/1460412.1460422

  36. Whitehouse, K., Tolle, G., Taneja, J., Sharp, C., Kim, S., Jeong, J., Hui, J., Dutta, P., Culler, D.: Marionette: Using RPC for interactive development and debugging of wireless, embedded networks. In: Proceedings of the IPSN/SPOTS (2006). doi:10.1109/IPSN.2006.243881

  37. Yang, J., Soffa, M., Selavo, L., Whitehouse, K.: Clairvoyant: a comprehensive source-level debugger for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceeding of the SenSys (2007). doi:10.1145/1322263.1322282

  38. Krunic, V., Trumpler, E., Han, R.: NodeMD: diagnosing node-level faults in remote wireless sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the MobiSys (2007). doi:10.1145/1247660.1247669

  39. Hartung, C., Seielstad, C., Holbrook, S., Han, R.: FireWxNet: A multi-tiered portable wireless system for monitoring weather conditions in wildland fire environments. In: Proceedings of the MobiSys (2006). doi:10.1145/1134680.1134685

  40. Yuan, F., Song, W., Peterson, N., Peng, Y., Wang, L., Shirazi, B., LaHusen, R.: A lightweight sensor network management system design. In: Proceeding of the PerCom (2008). doi:10.1109/PERCOM.2008.36

  41. Hui, J., Culler, D.: The dynamic behavior of a data dissemination protocol for network programming at scale. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2004). doi:10.1145/1031495.1031506

  42. Rost, S., Balakrishnan, H.: Memento: a health monitoring system for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the SECON (2006). doi:10.1109/SAHCN.2006.288514

  43. Cowan, C., Pu, C., Maier, D., Walpole, J., Bakke, P., Beattie, S., Grier, A., Wagle, P., Zhang, Q., Hinton, H.: StackGuard: automatic adaptive detection and prevention of buffer-overflow attacks. In: Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Security Conference, pp. 63–78 (1998)

  44. Khan, M., Le, H., Ahmadi, H., Abdelzaher, T., Han, J.: Dustminer: troubleshooting interactive complexity bugs in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2008). doi:10.1145/1460412.1460423

  45. Lodder, M., Halkes, G.P., Langendoen, K.G.: A global-state perspective on sensor network debugging. In: Proceeding of the HotEmNets (2008). ISBN: 978-1-60558-209-2

  46. Tavakoli, A., Culler, D., Shenker, S.: The case for predicate-oriented debugging of sensornets. In: Proceedings of the HotEmNetS (2008)

  47. Sookoor, T., Hnat, T., Hooimeijer, P., Weimer, W., Whitehouse, K.: Macrodebugging: global views of distributed program execution. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2009). doi:10.1145/1644038.1644053

  48. Hnat, T., Sookoor, T., Hooimeijer, P., Weimer, W., Whitehouse, K.: MacroLab: A vector-based macroprogramming framework for cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the SenSys (2008). doi:10.1145/1460412.1460435

  49. Römer, K.: Passive distributed assertions for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the DCOSS (2008)

  50. Römer, K., Ma, J.: PDA: Passive distributed assertions for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IPSN (2009). ISBN: 978-1-4244-5108-1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Informática e Sistemas, Universidade de Coimbra, Pólo 2, 3030-290, Coimbra, Portugal

    André Rodrigues

  2. Departamento de Engenharia de Computadores, Instituto Politécnico da Guarda, Avª Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro, no. 50, 6300-559, Guarda, Portugal

    Tiago Camilo

  3. Departamento de Engenharia Informática, Universidade de Coimbra, Pólo 2, 3030-290, Coimbra, Portugal

    Jorge Sá Silva & Fernando Boavida

Authors
  1. André Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiago Camilo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jorge Sá Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernando Boavida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Rodrigues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodrigues, A., Camilo, T., Silva, J.S. et al. Diagnostic Tools for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Survey. J Netw Syst Manage 21, 408–452 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-012-9240-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-012-9240-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation