Skip to main content
Log in

Cost Comparison of Alternative Architectures for IP-over-Optical Core Networks

  • Published:
Journal of Network and Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore alternative architectures to reduce cost of IP-over-optical core networks. We conducted a detailed cost study of three architectures. We start with a Baseline architecture that captures present mode of operations with future traffic projections and utilizes technologies such as Ethernet line-cards and OTN sub-wavelength switching. The next architecture, Streamlined, replaces the hub-and-spoke topology of Baseline with a flat topology and is also more judicious in its restoration design. Our detailed study shows significant cost savings for the Streamlined architecture compared to the Baseline. We reduce the cost further in our third proposed architecture: Ethernet enabled IP core consisting of OTN switches (with and without packet switching) and without any backbone routers or MPLS switches. Our results also demonstrate that we can achieve significant reduction in switching costs but reducing cost of transport remains a significant challenge. This paper is an extended version of our previous work published in (11th international conference on the design of reliable communication networks (DRCN), pp 227–234, 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the rest of the paper, we use BB and BR interchangeably.

  2. Streamline cost is the same as in Fig. 10b.

References

  1. Zhang, W., Bathula, B.G., Sinha, R.K., Doverspike, R., Magill, P., Raghuram, A., Choudhury, G.: Evolution of the IP-over-Optical Core network. In: 11th International Conference on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN), pp. 227–234. (2015)

  2. “OTN interfaces” Technical Report. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.709/en

  3. “Defense advanced research projects agency (DARPA) strategic technology office (STO) dynamic multi-terabit core optical networks:architecture, protocols, control and management (CORONET),” Technical Report. http://www.monarchna.com/CORONET-InfoPamphlet-DARPA

  4. Chiu, A., Choudhury, G., Clapp, G., Doverspike, R., Feuer, J.G.M., Jackel, J., Kim, G., Klincewicz, J., Kwon, T., Li, G., Magill, P., Simmons, J., Skoog, R., Strand, J., Lehmen, A., Wilson, S.W.B., Xu, D.: Architectures and protocols for capacity efficient, highly dynamic and highly resilient core networks [Invited]. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 4(1), 1–14 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiu, A.L., Choudhury, G., Clapp, G., Doverspike, R., Gannett, J.W., Klincewicz, J.G., Li, G., Skoog, R.A., Strand, J., VonLehmen, A., Xu, D.: Network design and architectures for highly dynamic next-generation IP-over-optical long distance networks. J. Lightwave Technol. 27(12), 1878–1890 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramamurthy, B., Sinha, R., Ramakrishnan, K.: Multi-layer design of IP over WDM backbone networks: impact on cost and survivability. In: Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN), 2013 9th International Conference on the, pp. 60–70. (2013)

  7. Oikonomou, K.N., Sinha, R.K., Doverspike, R.: A network design technique for selective restoration. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference 2011, p. OWAA5. Optical Society of America (2011)

  8. Palkopoulou, E., Schupke, D.A., Bauschert, T.: Quantifying CAPEX savings of homing architectures enabled by future optical network equipment. Telecommun. Syst. 52(2), 1123–1129 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Provider backbone bridge traffic engineering IEEE std. 802.1Qay,” Technical Report. 2009. http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/802.1ay.html

  10. Allan, D., Ashwood-Smith, P., Bragg, N., Farkas, J., Fedyk, D., Ouellete, M., Seaman, M., Unbehagen, P.: Shortest path bridging: efficient control of larger Ethernet networks. Commun. Mag. IEEE 48(10), 128–135 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. “Multi-protocol layer switching - transport protocol (MPLS-TP),” Technical Report. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6639

  12. “Virtual private LAN service (VPLS),” Technical Report. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4762.txt

  13. Choudhury, G., Klincewicz, J.: Survivable IP link topology design in an IP-over-WDM architecture. In: Design of Reliable Communication Networks, 2009. DRCN 2009. 7th International Workshop on, pp. 147–152. (2009)

  14. “CORONET topology,” Technical Report. http://monarchna.com/CORONET_CONUS_Topology.xls

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the DARPA CORONET Program, Contract N00173-08-C-2011. The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies, either expressed or implied, of DARPA or the Department of Defense. Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balagangadhar G. Bathula.

Additional information

Robert Doverspike and Peter Magill were employed with AT&T when this work was done.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Bathula, B.G., Sinha, R.K. et al. Cost Comparison of Alternative Architectures for IP-over-Optical Core Networks. J Netw Syst Manage 24, 607–628 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-016-9374-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-016-9374-z

Keywords

Navigation