Skip to main content
Log in

High Capacity and Resilient Large-Scale Deterministic IP Networks

  • Published:
Journal of Network and Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With 5G networking, deterministic guarantees are emerging as a key enabler. In this context, we present a scalable architecture for Large-scale Deterministic IP Networks (LDN) that meets end-to-end latency and jitter bounds. This work extends the original LDN (Liu et al. in IFIP Networking, 2021) architecture, where flows are shaped at ingress gateways and scheduled for transmission at each link using an asynchronous and cyclic opening of gate-controlled queues. To further optimize the utilization of bandwidth and accept more traffic, our Advanced-LDN (A-LDN) architecture introduces a new shaping mechanism based on transmission patterns. To protect flows against failures, we also implement Frame Replication and Elimination for Reliability (FRER). To do so, we leverage on the A-LDN mechanism for traffic scheduling and activate it at core nodes, i.e., adding the possibility for additional shifts inside core nodes, so that replicas can arrive at destination at the same time. In any case, the network remains stateless (no per-flow states at core nodes), ensuring scalability over large-scale networks. For the control plane, we present variants of a column generation algorithm to quickly take admission control decisions and maximize traffic acceptance. For a set of flows, it determines acceptance and selects the best shaping parameters, routing policy, transmission patterns, and scheduling. Through numerical results and packet level simulations in OMNeT++, we demonstrate that our A-LDN architecture with transmission patterns improves traffic acceptance by up to 67% compared to the original LDN architecture. We also demonstrate that FRER can be efficiently supported at the cost of some extra bandwidth utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We manually set the simulation duration to achieve a 95% confidence interval of having a maximum error of 0.001 when estimating the packet error rate in the random scenario.

References

  1. Liu, B., Ren, S., Wang, C., Angilella, V., Medagliani, P., Martin, S., Leguay, J.: Towards Large-Scale Deterministic IP Networks. In: IFIP Networking (2021)

  2. Parvez, I., Rahmati, A., Guvenc, I., Sarwat, A.I., Dai, H.: A survey on low latency towards 5G: RAN, core network and caching solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20, 4 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grossman, E.: Deterministic Networking Use Cases. RFC Editor (2019). https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC8578. https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8578.txt

  4. Li, R.: Towards a New Internet for the Year 2030 and Beyond. Proc. 3rd Annual ITU IMT-2020/5G Workshop Demo Day (2018)

  5. Nasrallah, A., Balasubramanian, V., Thyagaturu, A.S., Reisslein, M., Elbakoury, H.: Cyclic Queuing and Forwarding for Large Scale Deterministic Networks: A Survey. ArXiv abs/1905.08478 (2019)

  6. Deterministic Networking Architecture. RFC 8655 (2019)

  7. Qiang, L., Geng, X., Liu, B., Eckert, T., Geng, L., Li, G.: Large-Scale Deterministic IP Network. IETF Draft draft-qiang-detnet-large-scale-detnet-05 (September 2019)

  8. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks–Frame Replication and Elimination for Reliability. IEEE Std 802.1CB-2017, 1–102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2017.8091139

  9. Varga, A., Hornig, R.: An overview of the omnet++ simulation environment. In: Proc. Simutools (2008)

  10. Quan, W., Yan, J., Jiang, X., Sun, Z.: On-line traffic scheduling optimization in ieee 802.1 qch based time-sensitive networks. In: Prox. IEEE HPCC (2020)

  11. Máté, M., Simon, C., Maliosz, M.: Asynchronous Time-Aware Shaper for Time-Sensitive Networking. In: 2021 17th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), pp. 565–571 (2021). https://doi.org/10.23919/CNSM52442.2021.9615545

  12. Finn, N.: Introduction to time-sensitive networking. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2(2), 22–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.2018.1700076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, M., Geng, X., Li, Z.: Segment Routing (SR) Based Bounded Latency. Internet-Draft draft-chen-detnet-sr-based-bounded-latency-00, Internet Engineering Task Force (October 2018)

  14. Krolikowski, J., Martin, S., Medagliani, P., Leguay, J., Chen, S., Chang, X., Geng, X.: Joint routing and scheduling for large-scale deterministic ip networks. Comput. Commun. 165, 33–42 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, Y., Wang, S., Feng, T., Wang, J., Huang, T., Huo, R., Liu, Y.: Towards network-wide scheduling for cyclic traffic in ip-based deterministic networks. In: 2021 4th International Conference on Hot Information-Centric Networking (HotICN), pp. 117–122 (2021). IEEE

  16. Ergenç, D., Fischer, M.: On the reliability of ieee 802.1cb frer. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2021 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 1–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM42981.2021.9488750

  17. Casazza, M., Ceselli, A.: Optimization algorithms for resilient path selection in networks. Comput. Oper. Res. 128, 105191 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Oki, E., Matsuura, N., Shiomoto, K., Yamanaka, N.: A disjoint path selection scheme with shared risk link groups in gmpls networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 6(9), 406–408 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Silva, J., Gomes, T., Fernandes, L., Simoes, C., Craveirinha, J.: An heuristic for maximally srlg-disjoint path pairs calculation. In: 2011 3rd International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT), pp. 1–8 (2011). IEEE

  20. Nasrallah, A., Balasubramanian, V., Thyagaturu, A., Reisslein, M., ElBakoury, H.: Large scale deterministic networking: A simulation evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00162 (2019)

  21. Addanki, V., Iannone, L.: Moving a step forward in the quest for deterministic networks (detnet). In: IEEE/IFIP Networking (2020)

  22. Ergenç, D., Fischer, M.: Implementation and orchestration of ieee 802.1 cb frer in omnet++. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pp. 1–6 (2021). IEEE

  23. Le Boudec, J.-Y., Thiran, P. (eds.): Network Calculus, pp. 3–81. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eckert, T., Bryant, S., Malis, A.G.: Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Data Plane - MPLS TC Tagging for Cyclic Queuing and Forwarding (MPLS-TC TCQF). Internet-Draft draft-eckert-detnet-mpls-tc-tcqf-01, Internet Engineering Task Force (October 2021)

  25. Siachalou, S., Georgiadis, L.: Algorithms for precomputing constrained widest paths and multicast trees. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 13(5), 1174–1187 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2005.857117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Acharya, S., Chang, Y.J., Gupta, B., Risbood, P., Srivastava, A.: Precomputing high quality routes for bandwidth guaranteed traffic. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM ’04., vol. 2, pp. 1202–12072 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2004.1378146

  27. Shand, M., Bryant, S.: IP Fast Reroute Framework. RFC Editor (2010). https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC5714. https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5714

  28. Litkowski, S., Bashandy, A., Filsfils, C., Francois, P., Decraene, B., Voyer, D.: Topology Independent Fast Reroute using Segment Routing. Internet-Draft draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-08, Internet Engineering Task Force (January 2022). Work in Progress. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa/08/

  29. Finn, N.: Failure rates and P802.1CB (2013)

  30. Desaulniers, G., Desrosiers, J., Solomon, M.M.: Column Generation. Cahiers du GERAD. Springer, Berlin (2005)

  31. Wilhelm, W.E.: A technical review of column generation in integer programming. Optim. Eng. 2(2), 159–200 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Juttner, A., Szviatovski, B., Mecs, I., Rajko, Z.: Lagrange relaxation based method for the qos routing problem. In: Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society, vol. 2, pp. 859–8682 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2001.916277

  33. Yen, J.Y.: An algorithm for finding the shortest routes from all source nodes to a given destination in general networks. Q. Appl. Math. 27(4), 526–530 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Mészáros, L., Varga, A., Kirsche, M.: In: Virdis, A., Kirsche, M. (eds.) INET Framework, pp. 55–106. Springer, Cham (2019)

  35. https://research.cs.washington.edu/networking/rocketfuel/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Medagliani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angilella, V., Krasniqi, F., Medagliani, P. et al. High Capacity and Resilient Large-Scale Deterministic IP Networks. J Netw Syst Manage 30, 71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-022-09683-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-022-09683-3

Keywords

Navigation