Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Understanding the behavior of Solution-Guided Search for job-shop scheduling

  • Published:
Journal of Scheduling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates reasons behind the behavior of constructive Solution-Guided Search (SGS) on job-shop scheduling optimization problems. In particular, two, not mutually exclusive, hypotheses are investigated: (1) Like randomized restart, SGS exploits heavy-tailed distributions of search cost; and (2) Like local search, SGS exploits search space structure such as the clustering of high-quality solutions. Theoretical and experimental evidence strongly support both hypotheses. Unexpectedly, the experiments into the second hypothesis indicate that the performance of randomized restart and standard chronological backtracking are also correlated with search space structure. This result leaves open the question of finding the mechanism by which such structure is exploited as well as suggesting a deeper connection between the performance of constructive and local search.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Achlioptas, D., Gomes, C. P., Kautz, H. A., & Selman, B. (2000). Generating satisfiable problem instances. In Proceedings of the seventeenth national conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 256–261).

  • Baptista, L., & Silva, J. P. M. (2000). Using randomization and learning to solve hard real-world instances of satisfiability. In Principles and practice of constraint programming (pp. 489–494).

  • Beck, J. C. (1999). Texture measurements as a basis for heuristic commitment techniques in constraint-directed scheduling. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.

  • Beck, J. C. (2005). Multi-point constructive search. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming (CP’05) (pp. 737–741).

  • Beck, J. C. (2005). Multi-point constructive search: Extended remix. In Proceedings of the CP2005 workshop on local search techniques for constraint satisfaction (pp. 17–31).

  • Beck, J. C. (2006). An empirical study of multi-point constructive search for constraint-based scheduling. In Proceedings of the sixteenth international on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS06) (pp. 274–283).

  • Beck, J. C. (2007). Solution-guided multi-point constructive search for job shop scheduling. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 29, 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. C., & Fox, M. S. (2000). Dynamic problem structure analysis as a basis for constraint-directed scheduling heuristics. Artificial Intelligence, 117(1), 31–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. C., & Watson, J.-P. (2003). Adaptive search algorithms and fitness-distance correlation. In Proceedings of the fifth metaheuristics international conference.

  • Blazewicz, J., Domschke, W., & Pesch, E. (1996). The job shop scheduling problem: Conventional and new solution techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 93(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Gomes, C. P., & Selman, B. (2001). Formal models of heavy-tailed behavior in combinatorial search. In CP’01: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming (pp. 408–421). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., Frank, J., Gent, I. P., MacIntyre, E., Tomov, N., & Walsh, T. (1996). Local search and the number of solutions. In Proceedings of the second international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming (CP’96) (pp. 119–133). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gent, I. P., MacIntyre, E., Prosser, P., & Walsh, T. (1996). The constrainedness of search. In Proceedings of the thirteenth national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-96) (Vol. 1, pp. 246–252).

  • Gomes, C. P., & Selman, B. (1999). Search strategies for hybrid search spaces. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (p. 359). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, C. P., Selman, B., & Kautz, H. (1998). Boosting combinatorial search through randomization. In Proceedings of the fifteenth national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-98) (pp. 431–437).

  • Gomes, C. P., Selman, B., Crato, N., & Kautz, H. A. (2000). Heavy-tailed phenomena in satisfiability and constraint satisfaction problems. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 24(1/2), 67–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, C. P., Fernàndes, C., Selman, B., & Bessiere, C. (2004). Statistical regimes across constrainedness regions. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on the principles and practice of constraint programming (CP2004) (pp. 32–46).

  • Gomes, C. P., Fernández, C., Selman, B., & Bessière, C. (2005). Statistical regimes across constrainedness regions. Constraints, 10(4), 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, I. (2007). Empirical analysis of solution guided multi-point constructive search. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.

  • Heckman, I., & Beck, J. C. (2007). Fitness-distance correlation and solution-guided multi-point constructive search. In L. Perron & M. Trick (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference on integration of AI and OR techniques in constraint programming for combinatorial optimization problems (CPAIOR’07) (pp. 112–126). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., & Forrest, S. (1995). Fitness distance correlation as a measure of problem difficulty for genetic algorithms. In L. Eshelman (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference on genetic algorithms (pp. 184–192). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laarhoven, P. J. M., Aarts, E. H. L., & Lenstra, J. K. (1992). Job shop scheduling by simulated annealing. Operations Research, 40(1), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborie, P. (2003). Algorithms for propagating resource constraints in AI planning and scheduling: Existing approaches and new results. Artificial Intelligence, 143, 151–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Pape, C. (1994). Implementation of resource constraints in ILOG Schedule: A library for the development of constraint-based scheduling systems. Intelligent Systems Engineering, 3(2), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luby, M., Sinclair, A., & Zuckerman, D. (1993). Optimal speedup of Las Vegas algorithms. Information Processing Letters, 47, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattfeld, D. C., Bierwirth, C., & Kopfer, H. (1999). A search space analysis of the job shop scheduling problem. Annals of Operations Research, 86, 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., Selman, B., & Levesque, H. (1992). Hard and easy distributions of SAT problems. In Proceedings of the tenth national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-92) (pp. 459–465).

  • Nuijten, W. P. M. (1994). Time and resource constrained scheduling: a constraint satisfaction approach. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, Eindhoven University of Technology.

  • Parkes, A. J. (1997). Clustering at the phase transition. In Proceedings of the fourteenth national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-97) (pp. 340–345). Providence, RI.

  • Scheduler (2006). ILOG Scheduler 6.2 User’s manual and reference manual. ILOG, S.A.

  • Singer, J., Gent, I. P., & Smaill, A. (2000). Backbone fragility and local search cost peak. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 12, 235–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. M., & Dyer, M. E. (1996). Locating the phase transition in constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 81, 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.-P. (2003). Empirical modeling and analysis of local search algorithms for the job-shop scheduling problem. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Colorado State University.

  • Watson, J.-P., & Beck, J. C. (2008). A hybrid constraint programming/local search approach to the job-shop scheduling problem. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on integration of AI and OR techniques in constraint programming for combinatorial optimization problems (CPAIOR’08) (pp. 263–277).

  • Watson, J.-P., Barbulescu, L., Whitley, L. D., & Howe, A. E. (2002). Contrasting structured and random permutation flow-shop scheduling problems: search-space topology and algorithm performance. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 14(2), 98–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.-P., Beck, J. C., Howe, A. E., & Whitley, L. D. (2003). Problem difficulty for tabu search in job-shop scheduling. Artificial Intelligence, 143(2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., Gomes, C., & Selman, B. (2003). On the connections between backdoors, restarts, and heavy-tailedness in combinatorial search. In Proceedings of sixth international conference on theory and applications of satisfiability testing (SAT-03).

  • Wu, H., & van Beek, P. (2007). On universal restart strategies for backtracking search. In Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on the principles and practice of constraint programming (CP 2007) (pp. 681–695).

  • Yokoo, M. (1997). Why adding more constraints makes a problem easier for hill-climbing algorithms: Analyzing landscapes of CSPs. In Principles and practice of constraint programming (pp. 356–370).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Ivan Heckman

  2. Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    J. Christopher Beck

Authors
  1. Ivan Heckman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Christopher Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Christopher Beck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heckman, I., Beck, J.C. Understanding the behavior of Solution-Guided Search for job-shop scheduling. J Sched 14, 121–140 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-009-0113-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-009-0113-0

Keywords