Skip to main content
Log in

Flow shops with WIP and value added costs

  • Published:
Journal of Scheduling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 15 February 2015

Abstract

A new deterministic flow shop problem is studied where the objective is to minimize the total WIP (work-in-process) cost. Based on a value added model, the unit time WIP cost increases as a job passes through various stages in the production process.

The recognition version is unary NP-Complete even for two machines. Several simple and intuitive heuristics are presented. For each heuristic, we determine asymptotically attainable upper bounds on the relative error. Finally, the heuristics are empirically evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adiri, I., & Amit, N. (1984). Openshop and flowshop scheduling to minimize sum of completion times. Computers & Operations Research, 11, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R., Maxwell, W., McClain, J. O., & Thomas, L. J. (1988). The role of work-in-process inventory in serial production lines. Operations Research, 36, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R. W., Maxwell, W. L., & Miller, L. W. (1967). Theory of scheduling. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, F. D., Ghirardi, M., & Tadei, R. (2002). An improved branch-and-bound algorithm for the two machine total completion time flow shop problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croce, F. D., Narayan, V., & Tadei, R. (1996). The two-machine total completion time flow shop problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 90, 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garey, M. R., Johnson, D. S., & Sethi, R. (1976). The complexity of flowshop and jobshop scheduling. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, T., & Sahni, S. (1978). Flowshop and job shop schedules: complexity and approximation. Operations Research, 26, 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. L., Lawler, E. L., Lenstra, J. K., & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G. (1979). Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5, 287–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. G., & Sriskandarahjah, C. (1996). A survey of machine scheduling problems with blocking and no-wait in process. Operations Research, 44, 510–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J. C., & Chang, Y. L. (1991). A new heuristic for the n-job, m-machine flow-shop problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 52, 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J. C. (1995). Flowshop sequencing with mean flowtime objective. European Journal of Operational Research, 81, 571–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogeveen, J. A., & Kawaguchi, T. (1999). Minimizing total completion time in a two-machine flowshop: analysis of special cases. Mathematics of Operations Research, 24, 887–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogeveen, H., Schuurman, P., & Woeginger, G. J. (1998). Non-approximability results for scheduling problems with minsum criteria. In Proceedings of the 6th international IPCO conference on integer programming and combinatorial optimization (pp. 353–366).

  • Kamoun, H., & Srikandarajah, C. (1993). The complexity of scheduling jobs in repetitive manufacturing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 70, 350–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanet, J. J., & Sridaharan, V. (2000). Scheduling with inserted idle time: problem taxonomy and literature review. Operations Research, 48, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo, H. (1990). Cyclic sequencing problems in the two-machine permutation flow shop: complexity, worst-case, and average-case analysis. Naval Research Logistics, 37, 674–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W.-C., & Wu, C.-C. (2001). Minimizing the total flow time and tardiness in a two-machine flow shop. International Journal of Systems Science, 32, 365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röck, H. (1984). Some new results in no-wait flowshop scheduling. Zeitschrift Für Operations Research, 28, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, P., & Woeginger, G. J. (1999). Polynomial time approximation algorithms for machine scheduling: ten open problems. Journal of Scheduling, 2, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipper, D., & Shapira, R. (1989). JIT vs. WIP—a trade-off analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 27, 903–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Velde, S. L. (1992). Minimizing the sum of the job completion times in the two-machine flow shop by Lagrangian relaxation. Annals of Operations Research, 26, 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vempati, V. S., Chen, C.-L., & Bullington, S. F. (1993). An effective heuristic for flow shop problems with total flow time as criterion. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 25, 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollman, T. E., Berry, W. L., & Whybark, D. C. (1997). Manufacturing planning and control systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Chu, C., & Proth, J.-M. (1996). Efficient heuristic and optimal approaches for n/2/F/∑C i scheduling problems. International Journal of Production Economics, 44, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc E. Posner.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10951-015-0420-6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, J., Posner, M.E. Flow shops with WIP and value added costs. J Sched 13, 3–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-009-0130-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-009-0130-z

Keywords

Navigation