Skip to main content
Log in

Capacitated lot-sizing and scheduling with sequence-dependent, period-overlapping and non-triangular setups

  • Published:
Journal of Scheduling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In production planning, sequence dependent setup times and costs are often incurred for switchovers from one product to another. When setup times and costs do not respect the triangular inequality, a situation may occur where the optimal solution includes more than one batch of the same product in a single period—in other words, at least one sub tour exists in the production sequence of that period. By allowing setup crossovers, flexibility is increased and better solutions can be found. In tight capacity conditions, or whenever setup times are significant, setup crossovers are needed to assure feasibility. We present the first linear mixed-integer programming extension for the capacitated lot-sizing and scheduling problem incorporating all the necessary features of sequence sub tours and setup crossovers. This formulation is more efficient than other well known lot-sizing and scheduling models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Almada-Lobo, B., Klabjan, D., Oliveira, J. F., & Carravilla, M. A. (2007). Single machine multi-product capacitated lot sizing with sequence-dependent setups. International Journal of Production Research, 45(20), 4873–4894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balas, E. (1989). The prize collecting traveling salesman problem. Networks, 19(6), 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. R., & Clark, S. J. (2000). Rolling-horizon lot-sizing when set-up times are sequence-dependent. International Journal of Production Research, 38(10), 2287–2307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexl, A., & Kimms, A. (1997). Lot sizing and scheduling—survey and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 99(2), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, B. (1994). The discrete lot-sizing and scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 75(2), 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, B., & Meyr, H. (1997). The general lotsizing and scheduling problem. OR Spektrum, 19, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, M. (2000). A modified framework for modelling set-up carry over in the capacitated lotsizing problem. International Journal of Production Research, 38(14), 3421–3424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, M., Miller, D. M., & Schmidt, C. P. (1995). A framework for modelling setup carryover in the capacitated lot sizing problem. International Journal of Production Research, 33(7), 1973–1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, K. (1996). Capacitated lot-sizing with sequence dependent setup costs. OR Spektrum, 18, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, K., & Kimms, A. (2000). Lot sizing and scheduling with sequence dependent setup costs and times and efficient rescheduling opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics, 66, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instances (2009). URL http://paginas.fe.up.pt/~balobo/NonTriangular-Setups.

  • Laporte, G. (1992a). The travelling salesman problem: an overview of exact and approximated algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(2), 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laporte, G. (1992b). The vehicle routing problem: an overview of exact and approximated algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(2), 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porkka, P., & Kuula, A. P. J. V. M. (2000). A modified framework for modelling set-up carryover in the capacitated lotsizing problem. International Journal of Production Research, 38(14), 3421–3424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sox, C. R., & Gao, Y. (1999). The capacitated lot sizing problem with setup carry-over. IIE Transactions, 31(2), 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suerie, C. (2006). Modeling of period overlapping setup times. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2), 874–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suerie, C., & Stadtler, H. (2003). The capacitated lot-sizing problem with linked lot sizes. Management Science, 49(8), 1039–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, C., & Maravelias, C. T. (2008). A mixed-integer programming formulation for the general capacitated lot-sizing problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32, 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toso, E. A. V., & Morabito, R. (2005). Otimização no dimensionamento e seqüenciamento de lotes de produção: Estudo de caso numa fábrica de rações. Gestão e Produção, 12(2), 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolsey, L. (2002). Solving multi-item lot-sizing problems with an mip solver using classification and reformulation. Management Science, 48(12), 1587–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X. Y., & Wilhelm, W. E. (2006). Scheduling and lot sizing with sequence-dependent setup: a literature review. IIE Transactions, 38(11), 987–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo Almada-Lobo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menezes, A.A., Clark, A. & Almada-Lobo, B. Capacitated lot-sizing and scheduling with sequence-dependent, period-overlapping and non-triangular setups. J Sched 14, 209–219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-010-0197-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-010-0197-6

Keywords